>>98905(OP)

Ah, yes, it is, without a doubt, a part of the plan. You see, the intricacies of it are woven deeply into the very fabric of the strategy, a thread so subtle and delicate that most overlook its significance. It's one of those things that, when dissected, seems to disappear into the ether, only to resurface at the most unexpected of moments, often leaving a trail of confusion and bewilderment. But that’s the beauty of it. The plan would be incomplete without it. It is the quiet whisper in the back of your mind, the flicker in your peripheral vision, the thing you thought you understood but never truly grasped. Oh yes, it is there, making its presence known through the smallest actions, the most obscure decisions, and even in the moments of absolute stillness, when nothing seems to be happening at all.

And what of the other elements in the plan, you ask? Surely they have their role to play. But the truth is that without it, all the others would fall apart. It's the glue that holds everything together, though no one ever truly acknowledges it. It's the reason for every movement, the cause behind every ripple. It knows no time, no space, no boundaries, and yet somehow, it fits perfectly within the framework of the plan. It doesn't need to be loud or brash, as some of the other parts are. No, it operates quietly in the background, like the gears in a clock, unnoticed by many but crucial to the function of the whole.

You might wonder if it is even real. Is it truly something tangible, or is it merely an abstract concept, a figment of collective imagination, woven into the narrative as a symbol of something greater? And yet, when you look deeper, you realize that it is real, perhaps more real than anything else in the plan. You just can't see it yet—at least, not until the moment is right. It’s there in the pause between actions, in the breath before the next move is made. It is that split second when you think everything is about to fall apart, only for it to realign the course just in time.

The beauty of it is that it doesn't reveal itself immediately. No, that would be too simple. It requires patience, understanding, and sometimes, a bit of confusion. But in the end, when you look back and trace the path, you’ll see it everywhere, tucked away in places you least expect. It was always there, lurking just beneath the surface, waiting for its time to shine.

In the grand scheme of things, some might argue that it doesn't even need to be acknowledged, for its impact is felt even in its absence. It is the essence of the plan—both the question and the answer, the beginning and the end. And as you continue through the motions of the plan, you will find yourself unknowingly aligning with it, and only then will you realize that it was never an afterthought; it was the plan all along.

Looks like no one learned their lesson in 2019. Indeed, nothing will happen.

>>98905(OP)

Bhosdike meri chhat ke upar raat ke 3 baje top gun maverick chal rahi hai aur idhar tu bakwas kar raha hai betichod.

>>99038

Tujhe kuch hua behn ke lund? Nahi toh chup chaap hilake soja

>>99035

This

>>99254

>Omg! This! So much this! This is so heckin wholesome!!

Destroying terror camps and airports deep within pakistan proper qualifies as something

>>99269

even if nukes are discharged they will say nathing eber happened from inside thier bunkers

>>99269

>They're already attacking civilians and cuck chodi is playing drone drone

>>99270

These kids think just being contrarian and saying memes makes them sound smart.

>>99270

Not that, even my kalej eggjams aren't postponed. What kind of war has kalej exams going normally?

>>99273

It's almost all getting intercepted, dumbass. Just see how the battle of Britain went down for Luftwaffe after they started hitting civilians instead of military infrastructure.

>>99277

Go and study, you dumb retard.

>>99276

Your kind sound like perma online virgins who is deeply impacted by online shitposts and comment wars seething at normens with a life who don't see anything happening in their lives nor considers bombing of some irrelevant military spaces that don't impact most people's lives that relevant.

>>99285

>Meanwhile these kids are mad that he's college exams are postponed because they didn't study

Cool projection though lmao

>>99279

Are you aware that both sides claim they're not targeting civilians and only targetting bases? How are we sure that they were indeed targeting civilians? Were you there when they were intercepted? It could be an attack at a military base that was intercepted and spinned off as one at civilians to boost morale of citizenry. It's not the first time both lie to paint the other side as cartoonishly ebil villains.

>>99291

>hahaha u mad bro

I'm not a student, cool argument there though.

>>99298

>Le enlightened centrist

I'm not even going bothered with you faggot. Fuckk off back to r/librandu.

>>99304

I'm not even centre right you coon. I'm casteist, sexist, islamophobic, homophobic , etc... as they can be you based retard.

Have you wondered the reason why Chodi isn't escalating despite claims by lundian media that they're targeting civilians now might be because they're lies? He won 3 elections, he isn't as retarded as you perma twatter residing gremlins. My god giving chamars internet was a mistake.

>>99310

We saw dead bodies of 2 kids yesterday. There was also a list of all civilians dead and injured

>>99260

Chota sa gaon. Merely kilometres away from western command centre.

>>99318

That was from Indian attacks and alleged families of terrorist leaders.

Do you think military leaders of both countries are retards who love wasting precious resources on bum fucking no ones?

>>99310

>t.

>why Chodi isn't escalating?

Because most of paki attacks have been mostly toothless and there are bigger forces than just Pakistan at play here.

>Twitter

Literally where all you come from lmao unreal projection as per

>>99324

You are saying indian army killed are own kashmiris and pinned the blame on pakistan?

>>99325

>Chodi isn't escalating because they're toothless

You said they were trying to attack civilians. That isn't 'toothless' in any sense of the term. An attach on civilians by a foreign military body, even a failed one is considered serious under any law of war lol.

>Literally where all you come from

Kek, are you seriously implying that you were the OGs here busy making those foid threads until this war happened? That's even more pathetic lmao.

>>99329

Oh you were talking about the attack on Kashmir. It's not the first time cuckmiris get caught in cross border attacks.

>>99338

Look at my point, retard.

>Trying to attack

>Bigger forces than Pakistan

If you can't see the escalation ladder here, you're either dumb as shit or

>OG

Correct. I came from /int/ during lungimoot's inch. I don't even have a twitter account unlike you twatterfag.

>>99348

*or ideological shill

>>99348

So you admit nothing ever happens because muh vague and unseen 'bigger forces' but angry at people for saying nothing ever happens?

What ideological shill lmao. You called me an enlightened centrist without an ideology earlier.

>>99364

>Nothing ever happens

When is the last time this level of escalation last happened? When is the last time multiple pakistani and militant bases were targeted over the course of 3 days?

>an enlightened centrist

Is someone with an obvious poltical bias but pretend to be a centrist, newfag.

>>99345

>It's not the first time cuckmiris get caught in cross border attacks

So pakistan IS attacking civilians, unlike what you claimed

>>99382

>when was the last time

I don't know. But anything happened after that?

People say nothing ever happens not because nothing actually happened but because nothing changed.

So what did this level of escalation achieved? Has borders changed? Have people been affected? Have your life changed other than you now spenting more time online to fight with your keyboard?

>ideological bias

And that would be?

>>99387

Is India attacking Pakistani civilians?

>>99394

>you wondered the reason why Chodi isn't escalating despite claims by lundian media that they're targeting civilians now might be because they're lies?

This is what you said. In simple words, you said pakistan attacking indian civilians is a lie. Accept you are an ignorant faggot.

And about India attacking paki civilians, we saw pakis mourning the death of a few women and a kid

>>99393

Multiplayer bases and militant leaders getting killed means the new escalation ladder dictates that if Pakistan tries any more asymmetrical warfare, they'd have a new response level to war game, making their attack not any less impactful but also costly in turn. You think if Sonia didn't just go full Gandhi everytime Paki attacked us, they wouldn't have been so bold?

>ideological bias

A pacifist cuck of some pesuasial or the other, I don't care. You're simply not some objective arbitrator that you're trying to larp as.

>>99401

I never said civilians didn't die. I don't know if it's because you don't know how to read our being wilfully ignorant to just argue but 'targetting civilians' and 'civilians dying in military attacks' are two entirely different things.

The claim is that Pakistan did aim to attack civilians directly that India intercepted(which Pakis deny btw) and this isn't considered serious escalation for a war why?

>we saw pakis mourning the death of a few women and a kid

Once again, do you know how to read? Indians explicitly stated they've not targeted any civilians so you admitting this would mean you're going against the official army position that Indian escalated the situation by deliberately targeting civilians hence the aggresor here lmao. Please don't engage in conversations if you don't know basic literacy. At least that other guy is smart enough to read and understand.

>>99409

So don't know how this will change many people's lives, you're just confirming that nothing will happen x2 unless paks try to seriously escalate.

>>99448

I literally just said it, you clown.

>the new escalation ladder dictates that if Pakistan tries any more asymmetrical warfare, they'd have a new response level to war game, making their attack not any less impactful but also costly in turn.

If you can't see how it would change people's lives, you're just being a disingenuous shill for Sonia era gandhism.

>>99458

If this skirmish is successful then Pakis will just be more mindful or even reluctant about using guerilla militant tactics. All this will result is Kashmir returning to status quo before the skirmish even more. Unless as I said paks try to seriously escalate.

>disingenuous shill for Sonia era gandhism.

Not really, if this works I'm all for it.

>>99483

If skirmish is successful, Pakistan will lose the capacity to engage in that level of asymmetrical warfare - of which, it's involved in more than just Kashmir, let alone motivation for it. By escalating and not letting Asim Munir come out this looking strong, we hurt the amry where it actually matters - it's legimatacy.