Recent Posts
Is Indra considered the Supreme God In vedic hinduism?, and did the Puranas destroyed his image?
sZvBQX
No.1273
As per the title,Rigved is oldest Hindu text and clearly it signals that Indra is supreme.So why does current Hindus do not worship him like purana gods(Shiva,Vishnu and his avatara's) or the vedas are now being used by just to kang on other religions that our oldest text was wriiten almost 2x earlier than ur's.
+Indra also got his counterparts in many other pagan religions,and he was clearly older written than his counterpart,on the other hand Purana God's rarely got their counterpart's in other religions.
Correct me if i am wrong,am Just curious about these thing.
O4khH+
No.1275
>>1273(OP)
Most pajeets don't read their scriptures, those who do are moralfaggots and divided among gayvites and gayshavites and shietz
wS9mus
No.1276
>>1273(OP)
Yes, Vedas are written by Aryan men and purans are written by pot bellies ponga pandit brahmins
Indra is the supreme pagan god. Vedic religion was pagan but modern day hinduism is cluster fuck (indian) oriented religion
0KXoQS
No.1278
>>1273(OP)
Because Indra lost. Plain and simple. Narayan conquers, veda fags can keep coping.
9JVY6Q
No.1433
fir mein kuch bolunga toh vivaad ho jayega...
wBXHUi
No.1467
>>1278
Based but respect both
wBXHUi
No.1468
>>1433
If that happened then how did he appear in Mahabharata 🤔 also most scriptures say he defeated indra .
8Z7cpE
No.1469
>>1433
That's a different krishna. Vasudeva Krishna comes from Vasudeva of Vrishnis. There is also a Krishna Dwaipanya
8Z7cpE
No.1470
>>1468
Why would I worship demigods when I can worship Swayambhu Naryan himself , personification of Brahman, the sucessful putschist against India's degeneracy, the coming messiah , the king in gold?
ZaxN/8
No.1471
>>1273(OP)
>Is Indra considered the Supreme God In vedic hinduism?
Depends, vedic deities are both than that, there is tvastr, vishnu, mitrha, agno, but Rig Veda goes on to talk about Indra in great detail.
>and did the Puranas destroyed his image?
Yes, because purana were very strongly coded by sects. Which is why they must be taken with a bit of grain of salt.
ZaxN/8
No.1472
>>1276
>Would you like barley, yogurt or milk
>Praised for being full bellied in rule
>Pepooke pray for their grains being full
You are being retarded. Their is virtually no real difference based on which purana you talk about, the only difference being war time favours the god who is impulsive. That is all, to insult those who wrote either (given it's the same lineage in the end) is stupid. We are in a state of change, this why in our infantile mind we are trying to look back on the gods who asked us to pick up our arms. But to throw shades at othe deities or those who were it's scribe is retarded subhuman behaviour.
ZaxN/8
No.1473
>>1472
Additionally our focus given how we are showing a spiritual shift, aligning with lord Indra, just go on focus on on what are his names, what are the postive examples he has set and how to invoke him instead. Show some intellectual integrity on this rather than chimping out, about what the puranas did.
ZaxN/8
No.1474
>>1278
Yaar retard, narayan is in vedas too, what kind of even low IQ phrasing are these? The more I see you retards talk, more I see why vedas were gate kept.
ZaxN/8
No.1475
>>1371
>gods dont give a damn about your steppe blood or AASI blood
True this, don't agree with rest of it.
>>1375
>skin tone is determined by race
Not true, phenotype ≠genotype, you are probably smart enough to figure out why. Race realism on its own is retarded due to evidence of the zero haplogroup where we all came from. It's just that we are concoction of superior branches, which just went wrong.
T4dIdD
No.1488
>>1474
So? Are we saying Narayan of Vedas is same as Narayan of puranas?
