Recent Posts
TsBIHf
No.1636
what are his views on genetics ?
given that he believes in varna system and difference in capabilities of people by birth.
tCgVq0
No.1637
>>1636(OP)
Chamar from my village looks exactly like him.
RLpSS+
No.1638
>>1637
Kek
gwqeRY
No.1639
>>1636(OP)
Useless chamar bamans who destroyed hinduism , couldn't have developed a papal bull like structure
saSO1B
No.1640
>>1639
matlab handu badhna bhi chahega to wo bhi pope ki buddhi rakhke!
9YRfTE
No.1641
>>1636(OP)
Only rajasthani bamans are based, Rest of them are either cucks for LCs or k2as or just dysgenic
jKgkwL
No.1643
>>1641
Trvke
xrmSPO
No.1644
>>1641
you mean the bamans of Rajputs or the native bamans ? both the different
OeGwwe
No.1645
>>1644
TF is brahmins of rajput
iHT9AZ
No.1650
>>1644
Rajasthani Brahmins. Like Rajpurohits, Dhadhich etc. (can confirm those guys don't even accept their dotters wearing a skirt.)
y+lsoC
No.1651
>>1650
Rajpurohits are Goswamis from Mathura btw
QSNTAy
No.1652
>>1636(OP)
What has he done to benefit Hindoo?
mbGXmd
No.1653
>>1652
nothing.
There should be no Godmen between Man & God.
Organized religion is bad.
Religion is opium of the masses.
happy ?
now leave.
QSNTAy
No.1654
>>1653
No its a serious question. Has he done anything of value that he should be taken seriously?
hcKBOI
No.1655
>>1654
His mere command is his supreme service to the religion.
He is a Hindu Pope along with 3 other Popes.
Now you must research it yourselves, what Popes do for their religion.
QSNTAy
No.1657
>>1655
He is a political opportunist at best. In his own words, scriptures are supreme not people.
He has said many good things. But good luck to him and you in bringing back (indian) system
> muh Hindu poop
You mean he fucks kids?
tgyUBN
No.1658
>>1657
nobody was talking anything related to c@ste system here. Now I get it that you are a troll.
QSNTAy
No.1659
5GaZW2
No.1660
>>1636(OP)
mofo can't live a day without khaini
wyjhZH
No.1675
>>1655
That's a pretty good parallel, I feel like he is not a good figure while the post is great. We need a new sankracharya who is better at delegation without the need to affirm to beliefs of those who are not Savarna as well as look at it with a more functional point of view, without having to sacrifice orthodox beliefs.
>>1636(OP)
My same response to this. He seems ok but I do not think he is well literate on genetics. So he is wise but can't see entire picture. It is simply not enough. We need someone who is as well versed in scriptures but also more literate in science as well as history and archaeogenetics.
We9I2Z
No.1697
>>1637
He's old and probably malnourished, mf.
cxVSO4
No.1730
>>1639
this would have literally destroyed hinduism then just see what happened to zoroastrians under a single authority
