/b/ - Random

Forget all the BS you have been taught by aamir khan's satyamev jayate or feminist thinkers who taught you rape is about power, patriarchy, lack of sex ed or misogyny. Libbus are anti science and anti biology people. They believe in their religion of tabula rasa and think every issue can be rectified by social change. They are obssessed with blaming the system for failings of people or certain groups unable to accept that genetics govern criminality, psychology and behavior of those groups. They cant come to accept that there all equal all happy utopia exists in dreams only. Now coming back to question.

Real answer: Reproductive strategy. There are two ways to reproduce either invest resources on a female to get reproductive access to her or just do it. Human males invest resources on a female by taking her to dates, giving presents, having good looks, intelligence and nice personality.

Example: Nirbhaya case. Nirbhaya's boyfriend took her out on a movie date. One may not even realize it but subconsciously it was an attempt of wooing or gaining reproductive access to her in future. The six majdoors who raped her used different reproductive strategy. They lacked resources, were incapable of wooing a female or raising a family due to their dehati personalities, bimaru looks and low intelligence. The failed men in a way go for r selection where they try to copulate with as many females as possible to increase the odds that at least some get impregnated and some of their offsprings manage to survive without paternal investment. Needless to say it happens on subconscious level and they may not even realize it.

>>166729

And why people rape family members when they have wives.

OP is a dumb faggotè

>>166729

The initial impetus is a biological drive on subconscious level but since the rapists are humans not animals they do have brains to understand the legal consequences after post rape orgasm clarity. The human cognition resumes working after post rape clarity and cessation in activity of monkey brain and instincts. Even then murder doesnt always follow rape.

>>166730

You are dumb if you dont understand statistics. Rapists and criminals in general are low iq people statistically. Exceptions exist but most rapists are lowlife men and most rape victims are young fertile women. Its clearly a reproductive strategy coming from the monkey brain.

>>166733

>Murder won't save them from legal consequences bruh.

Its often a desperate attempt on their part to save themselves from law after post rape nut clarity when they realize they fucked up.

>>166735

How do you explain 60+ years grannies getting raped dumbfuck?

and what about those that never try?

>>166739

there are different reasons, op is low iq fag so he generalizes to one thing

>>166728(OP)

if a pajeet gets raped by an uggo ass pajeeta, would that be considered as rape too?

>>166741

Yep. I can understand high T as a reason to go mindless at the sight of a female but desire to breed and have children is highly retarded.

>>166733

>the girl will just be given an abortion at the hospital nowadays.

I cant believe how low iq you people are. We didnt have hospitals etc in our monkey caveman days. You guys never understand things like statistics, probablities and instincts. I clearly stated that it all happens on a subconscious level in their monkey brains and they may not even realize it themselves. Ofc its their instincts at play here not conscious thought. Jeez it feels like talking to a child. The reason you jerk off to porn is because your instincts are to reproduce even though you know you cant reproduce that way. The reason kids are afraid of dark is again instincts of avoiding predators from our monkey days back in time.

>>166743

often times rapu is just about exploitation and show of dominance, anyone who disagree is likely biased.

>>166739

You are <90iq person i can smell that through the screen. Can you even grasp abstract concepts like probabilities and statistics? 'Most' rape victims are young women period. Ofc grannies do get raped and even prepubescent girls but we dont really know someone's age for sure in nature. They fuck indiscriminately because thats exactly r selection mode of reproduction i.e. if it looks female just do it cuz you are increasing your odds anyway.

>>166755

Anon if you can't tell whether a 3 year old or 70 year old looks like she can bear children, you have iq<20

Please also explain people raping monitor lizards. I'm sure they too want cross-species children or something.

Dumb. Fucking. Retard.

>>166748

>reproductive strategy" would have involved long term planning and shit rather than just I shoot semen in vagina.

Its 'r selection' form of reproductive strategy where male just fucks women indiscriminately to increase odds of at least some offsprings being born and surviving without paternal investment. Ofc it is a risky strategy which is why usually only lowlife men go for it.

>>166759

I am tired of explaining statistics to your <90 iq brain. If you are incapable of abstraction then i cant do much. Showing me some rare freak cases doesnt change the obvious data that most rape victims are young women. Ofc pedos, homos, zoophiles also exist on fringes but they are a separate phenomenon and dont affect the obvious statistical reality. Stop thinking in absolutes. Exceptions exist and prove the rule.

>>166765

On the contrary, a large number of rapes are committed by powerful, maybe even rich people because they know they can get away with it and want to show their dominance like >>166754 said.

Don't try to use the stupid argument >>166770 because the exceptions are so many they prove the rule itself wrong.

>>166755

stfu bozo

>>166772

>a large number of rapes are committed by powerful, maybe even rich people because they know they can get away with it.

Thats statistically untrue. Most rapists are low iq males who failed in life. The rich have higher iqs, are less impulsive and have plenty of resources for easy reproductive access and raising offspring. Whenever a rich famous person is found guilty of rape it causes huge scandal but in reality such an isolated case is overshadowed by all the other cases of rapes.

>>166759

fr dude, that n1gger is brain ded libtard. a true retard among us kek

>>166772

> a large number of rapes are committed by powerful, maybe even rich people

That's not true at all. It's a myth perpetuated movies because it will be hard to root against the rapist when the raped is a middle class pajeeta or the rapist is a chamar minimum wage coolie(like in case of Nirbhaya kek).

Think about it for a second, rich goys can order the best class randis just a call away, why would they rape some random pajeeta they saw on street?

>inb4 Epstein

He wasn't running some loli brothel. Most of his 'victims' are girls in their fertile years(15-17) who were rather complicit in their so called 'rape'. Most of them were recruited rather 'willingly' who were mostly runaways from their homes and their rape is only 'rape' under the statutory definition of rape(Having sex with anyone below age of consent, which is a rather recent definition of rape because historically lots of girls got impregnated willingly as young as 13 kek).

>>166728(OP)

>Here’s Pov

Rape you guys have confused too much with free will

A Man in their mind and life can think, and choose however they want to. (except few)

It is the question of critical thinking that no matter what was the driving factor, was it sexual, was it necrotic, was it delusional. The critical thinking, is what is the rape all about. You cannot change a consent by force, because in the preset of this same sentence there are other sentences that let’s (you) decide what to do.

If any thing drives you to break someone else’s choice, you cannot choose, people will choose for you aswell, you will go to jail and you should be roped. because if you break someone else’s choice, you rightfully give up on yours as well. what happens to you after you rape someone is not your choice. live with that.

>>166780

Free will is a religious myth. Our thoughts arise from our brain which in turn is affected by neurobiology and neurochemistry governed by genetics unique to individual. The decisions we take in our lives whether good or bad are a combination of our genetics and environment(circumstances, prior experiences).

>>166776

Hmm maybe you're right in a modern context though you still have Prajwal Revanna type politicians.

But go back a few centuries and you'll see feudal armies and kings had this habit of raping the opponent kingdom's women after defeating them to show dominance, especially islamic hordes. They don't want what they can get, they want what they would normally be denied.

>>166801

Concubinage was different from raping indiscriminately. Rapey lord or king is just a trope and they were rather rare often somewhat mentally unstable to rule for long. Most kings were wise leaders and knew they wont rule for long if their social and religous conduct was bad.

>>166805

There was a reason Jauhar existed anon.

Women literally preferred to throw themselves into flames and die than be raped by invader armies

>>166801

Happened in WW2 too.

>>166794

>>The critical thinking, is what is the rape all about. You cannot change a consent by force, because in the preset of this same sentence there are other sentences that let’s (you) decide what to do.

i literally said that there are presets to critical thinking. if you can say that free will is not true(it is also your free will) , free will is not what you think you can do, there are genetic limitations i know that, one cannot decide and do. I am saying is free will in societal matter is not same situation what happens in personal life. Societal free will is well defined into a boundary and there are many ways to describe these boundaries, some are religious, some are political, some are not good for bussiness and these free will binding reasons are exactly what applies to rape scenarios aswell, you cannot spontaneously one day decide that you want to leak the secrets your were meant to protect on first place and not face consequences. you may not kill a guy a for money because it was your basic need and you think that you deserve food and not face a consequence. you may-not fuck a whore who said no to you because she don’t want to do the sex and shit for you and not face a consequence. these are societal norms, you cannot expect them to be understandable that you got a boner and needed to goon. you face the consequences, and you should. there’s no rich and poor to it.

these rules are global. otherwise if we followed what OP is saying, then brahmins would become the biggest dalals in india, because they would say, we lied about god because god told us to do so.

>>166728(OP)

Op is right. Low iq femishits trying to dodge the issue. Rape is just abt being horny and having the power to do bad things to a gal or boy simple. Most ppls moral instincts stop them, lowlifes don't simple

i think the problem with rapists is they think they can “explain” why they did it.

>>166832

and society needs to stop blaming all men who fucks

>>166819

Armies consist of people of all social strata. Your average foot soldier was some poor farmer or labourer who would rape, sariya and dump women with right opportunity. Kings generally werent known for rapes as it would have been bad for military discipline. Kings would take concubines but it wasnt considered rape the way it is today because the concubines were under kings guardianship.

>>166728(OP)

OP you are an idiot who picked very retarded yet very specific points to confirm personal bias. It has zero grounding in reality, you are literally as retarded as feminists and libtards you are trying to criticise.

>>166864

Concubines still is not rape anon, because it is a little bit consensual. Naturally the women had a far less say on the matter but the truth is this is not relevant regardless because Kings kind of didn't force themself on women magically.

They had more than a single concubine going for them and they had no need to take care of the sexual needs through this one very specific new concubine they got.

>>166729

to not get jailed bruh, the urge reproduce only lasts until pre nut delusion period

>>166739

the unconscious isnt smart enough to know whether something really is human and reproducible thats why you have waifuists and zoophiles

>>166895

>thats why you have waifuists and zoophiles

Retard that has no basis in urge to reproduce. It is strictly about dopamine rush and finding the means and substitute for lack of sexual partner. Over time substitute becomes hard wired in the retards, specially those that don't have a very good mental state. This is why a lot of zoophile and peodphilles are found to be on spectrum.

Reproduction has nothing to do with any of it. Feminists are retarded because they make it all seems like this is some societal issue, when it is about subhumans and retards being subhumans and retards.

>>166911

The dopamine rush evolved to encourage reproduction.