Recent Posts
Dyaush k2a hai
Krp94v
No.195304
If a muslimahh ties you rakhi should one assume she's trying to flirt with you?
pZvn8W
No.195308
>>195304(OP)
Penguins bhee hindu hote hain? So the Astra ka Tika theories were true about antartica.
+Cc66G
No.195321
>>195304(OP)
yeah for them its merely a game with no faith in any ritual involved.
It simply means that she is sexually available for you because in average Muslim family they fuck their siblings behind their parents.
vW6g03
No.195348
>>195321
>It simply means that she is sexually available for you because in average Muslim family they fuck their siblings behind their parents.
Kys, incest pajeet. We don't do that, unless you're talking about yourself, porkis, kanglus and other south asian pajeets
ujy7Ho
No.195356
+Cc66G
No.195365
>>195348
its common in most muslim families for the brother to be sexually attracted to his sister or mother. Many times the brother also makes active effort to see them naked in bathroom or other places.
ujy7Ho
No.195367
>>195365
Not brother but cousin memes are true. They mingle a lot with their cousin.
+Cc66G
No.195371
>>195367
even with siblings. You haven't heard of their maulanas where they suggest that all females in house should cover themselves from all males including son and father with the exception of husband.
vW6g03
No.195382
>>195365
What the fuck are you talking about, retarded pajeet? Or did this all happen to you? I've never done anything like that to my big sister or mother. Do you even have a sister, ffs? I have a big sis, and we've got a deep bond just like any other bro and sis. We even celebrate rakhi in a casual way. Today, I gifted her a digital artwork of us from my convocation ceremony, since she was with me at that time. She loved it, shared it with her friends & our relatives through whatsapp, and handed me a rakhi & hugged me before she left for her job.
+Cc66G
No.195384
I mean even Muhammad sahab married his own daughter-in-law.
It leaves no space for any asexual thought towards women even within one's own family.
QWis6c
No.195385
masallah
EHCAYA
No.195394
>>195382
stop calling yourself Muslim.
EHCAYA
No.195395
he must be a shia or kuffarmaxxing engaging in all sorts of shirk
1+ZqSV
No.195399
>>195365
That's just a pajeet thing, not specifically a muslim thing. Especially among millennial pajeets who were sexually frustrated but had no access to porn or internet.
+Cc66G
No.195402
>>195399
stop dodging, it happens in majority of middle class muslim families even in this era
1+ZqSV
No.195404
+Cc66G
No.195408
1+ZqSV
No.195410
>>195402
I don't know about Muslim middle class families but it seems like incestous voyeurism is popular among apajeets of all classes even today. There's many telegram channels where you can find pajeets of all class and creed obsessed with showing off their mothers/sisters kek.
+Cc66G
No.195413
1+ZqSV
No.195417
>>195413
Are you a muslim? Seems like you know a lot about it. Have you had experience fucking your sis?
+Cc66G
No.195422
>>195417
I live among Muslims, have a LOT of Muslim friends. I have visited their homes MANY times. Even my tuition teacher was Muslim who taught in his home in a room in the middle of his house.
I have read many subtle signs before coming to this conclusion.
1+ZqSV
No.195426
>>195422
You can come out and admit you fucked your sister in here anon, don't need to make up stories about happening it to a friend of a friend. How was she like? Is she hot?
Eij/DL
No.195429
>>195426
put your penis in your pants anon
+Cc66G
No.195431
>>195426
don't derail the thread. i know you are offended because the truth is difficult to digest.
The Zaynab syndrome runs deep in all Muslim families.
1+ZqSV
No.195432
>>195422
How was your first experience with your sister like?
+Cc66G
No.195435
>>195429
he is offended because I said the truth and even he feels it and knows it.
vW6g03
No.195436
>>195394
By name, I am. But I don't believe in any cavemen religion faggotry.
1+ZqSV
No.195438
1+ZqSV
No.195439
>>195435
Not really, you seems to have great experience with these things and want to just know.
+Cc66G
No.195445
+Cc66G
No.195449
>>195436
ahh... a liberal muslim then. But this thread is not about Islam so I won't argue on this any further.
1+ZqSV
No.195451
>>195445
>Look how mad you are
Not really. I am just curious because you're very informed.
Say I assume it happened to a friend of a friend like you claim.
Can you tell me how you came to know about it? Have you seen them doing it, your friend and his sister?
1+ZqSV
No.195457
>>195431
What is Zaynab syndrome and what makes it common for muslim siblings to fuck each other? Afaik muzzies are just pajeets wearing thopis so curious to know what makes them more susceptible to incest.
+Cc66G
No.195468
>>195451
>it happened to a friend of a friend like you claim
not freind of friend but my own friends and the muslims I know. They repeatedly give off these suggestions in a subtle way. I simply read those signs as a evidence of difference between avergage mindset in Hindu and Muslim families.
Btwdo you not have any relatives who married their own cousin whom they knew since childhood or even played with them during those days ?
+Cc66G
No.195469
>>195457
Zaynab bint Jahsh wife of Zayd ibn Haritha al-Kalbi.
I know adoption is not considered as legal in Islam but still...
1+ZqSV
No.195472
>>195468
What vibes? Can you explain further what they said about their sisters that give you this vibe?
>Btwdo you not have any relatives who married their own cousin whom they knew since childhood
No but I know South Indian Telegu Hindu guy who married his cousin who ran the PG I was staying Banglore. His cousin was cute tho but he looks like an average ugly fatso in a Telegu movie.
1+ZqSV
No.195473
>>195469
Who wife of who?
+Cc66G
No.195484
>>195472
subtle suggestions in random day to day talks, not anything outrightly explicit but they speak from a line of thought that being a Hindu I can't think about for my own sisters, mother and female cousins.
1+ZqSV
No.195487
>>195484
Lines of thought like what? Can you give me what they said about their sisters? Did they say their sisters was hot?
+Cc66G
No.195491
>>195473
zaynab the 7th wife of muhammad (daughter zaynab is different) who was married to his adopted son Zayd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaynab_bint_Jahsh#Marriage_to_Zayd
you know everything, you were so offened in this thread that I can clearly tell that you are a Muslim but you are now just trying to hide your identity and deflect all this on whole Pajeet race or south Indians.
+Cc66G
No.195492
>>195487
>their sisters was hot
not that explicit but many similar things which one could only say about a female to whom one can show his legitimate sexual interest.
1+ZqSV
No.195500
>>195491
I don't know any of those. I'm no muzzie.
Tbh adoptional fiance shit was common among many cultures and I don't really think of it as incest. It was common for families especially rich ones to adopt a girl and groom her as their sons wife.
>I'm offended
Not really, I'm just curious for your personal experience.
>It's common among pajeets
Because it is not I've only heard hearsay and curios to know from someone with firsthand experience.
Should I post my uncut bdl to prove you wrong?
>>195492
What did they say about them?
+Cc66G
No.195520
>>195500
Muhammad later married her daughter in law.
In Hindus our Daughter in Laws aren't seen in a similar way by Father in Laws.
>What did they say about them?
Passing low-key filthy (in a sexual way) comments. Not explicity but still. As if you are talking about a female who is not from your family and marrying her won't be tabooed by the society.
1+ZqSV
No.195593
>>195520
What exactly did they say?
+Cc66G
No.195609
>>195593
why are you so concerned about the specific comments ? I can barely recall those random talks which suggested their subtle sexual line of thought. I can produce a few lines from my memory like something related to the way their sisters look/walk/behave or something related to them when were talking about girls in a sexual way in general.
It runs deep and only people who are from outside of that culture can realize that the specific line of thought is originating from a filthy mindset.
1+ZqSV
No.195623
>>195609
Where they talking or concerned about how sluttily their sisters are dressed? Do you have no issues when your sister dress sluttily?
1+ZqSV
No.195626
>>195609
>Concerned about specific comments
I'm just curious what did they say that gave you the confirmation they're fucking but apparently you can't even recall that?
S0Pzfx
No.195633
>>195304(OP)
Kek yaar,if only god was real a thick muslima would approach me and tie a rakhi to me later down the year we could r.p bro sis while cosy sax
1+ZqSV
No.195634
>>195520
>In Hindus our Daughter in Laws aren't seen in a similar way by Father in Laws
Actually sir
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avunculate_marriage
South Indian Hindus are the only culture that does this. Hinduism isn't a monolithic religion like Islam.
+Cc66G
No.195680
>>195634
its prohibited in manusmiriti. Its a tribal practise in south india followed by lower castes.
JiMDsR
No.195681
1+ZqSV
No.195684
>>195680
Manusmriti isn't the only dharma shastras there is. Most Hindus don't even follow Manusmriti these days. They should honestly.
>त्रिंशद्वर्षो वहेत् कन्यां हृद्यां द्वादशवार्षिकीम् । त्र्यष्टवर्षोऽष्टवर्षां वा धर्मे सीदति सत्वरः ॥ ९४ ॥
If only families gave me their 12 yo loli daughteru for rishta. Though I'm not a pedo but more an ephebophile so I rather have them give me their 16-18 year old instead.
1+ZqSV
No.195688
>>195682
You said you got the idea of them fucking from their comments but can't even remember what they said. Am I wrong in getting upset over you leading me and wasting my time all this time? I guess people with enough free time in their hands don't think it's worth to get upset over.
+Cc66G
No.195692
>>195684
marriage is not synonymous to sex in Hinduism. These are two distinct things.
There are many marriages throughout Hindu tradition where the couple remained ascetic.
In Muslims the Nikah inevitably leads to sex without considering the age of girl involved but not so in Hinduism.
1+ZqSV
No.195695
>>195692
>married but remained ascetic
Its called grooming sirs. And it was common in ancient times.
It's the same excuse muzzies give when pointed out mommad married a 6 yo
'Oh but he only had sex with her when he was 9/10/12 years old' or something.
1+ZqSV
No.195696
mhPLFO
No.195698
>>195382
chup reh k2a hume pata he tu taqiya kr rh he tera genocide toh hoke rahega
+Cc66G
No.195702
>>195688
read this>>195609
>something related to the way their sisters look/walk/behave or something related to them when were talking about girls in a sexual way in general.
So there was one very specific moment that I remember because it was my own Muslim tuition teacher involved. He had a jawan daughter who rarely came out of her room during our classes. Once I reached early in the class and there was only that teacher sittin in that class and the previous batch was leaving.
I sat in the class and he probably forgot to notice me. His daughter passed by the gate of that class which was right next to his chair. She was walking slowing with her mother (his wife) talking about something (i can't remember but I think its was something related to the food that was to be prepared on that night), then this man suddenly slapped the butt of his Jawan 24-25 year old fully adult daughter telling her to do some errand. She saw me but ignored me. (perhaps in embarrasment?) And went away with her mom.
This was one of the explicit ones which I remember completely but there were multiple more subtlers account when my muslim friends indirectly sexualized their own sister/mother or talked about someone else's family by putting their own notions of relationship in someone else's family. Now that I think of those moments it reveals that they didn't saw their mothers/sisters in the same way as hindus do.
+Cc66G
No.195709
QTc9J1
No.195741
>>195684
Manusmriti is the final verdict for hindus, it's word is supreme and more important than some book written by ooga booga baba.
+Cc66G
No.195742
fRKuGA
No.195773
>>195741
Manusmriti is just 2nd century incel manifesto
QTc9J1
No.195777
>>195773
Spoken a like a true ignorant.
yvbwkn
No.195781
>>195741
So shudras are indeed to be oppressed?
QTc9J1
No.195784
>>195781
No, manusmiriti doesn't support this idea.
+Cc66G
No.195785
yvbwkn
No.195790
>>195784
Whom are you fooling pajeet.
QTc9J1
No.195792
>>195790
I dont need to.
+Cc66G
No.195793
>>195790
so u didn't reply to my comment here ? I want an explanation
QTc9J1
No.195795
>>195793
He has mustache splits, he will be never be fuhrer.
yvbwkn
No.195796
>>195792
But you are.
QTc9J1
No.195801
>>195796
When?
orHY2Q
No.195803
>>195410
Ok pajeet. We get you're trying to come out in your own way
1+ZqSV
No.195860
>>195702
>he slapped her ass
That's just typical zero self awareness pajeet baap things.
>indirectly sexualized their own sister/mother or talked about someone else's family by putting their own notions of relationship in someone else's family
What do you mean? Can you be more specific instead of being vague?
>>195709
I don't care about your religious wars nignoggery bhai. I'm an atheist and I don't care which one you follow, ancient desert cult or ancient pastoral cult lol.
>I can explain
Bro there's no way to cut it. Manusmriti allowed ritualistic grooming kek. Just say based and pass on instead of trying to fit it to sensibilities created by liberalism lmao.
>>195741
Based if true.
+Cc66G
No.195865
>>195860
>Can you be more specific instead of being vague?
I can't recall the whole convos from starting to end. Tose were statements in the midst of conversations which can't be reproduced in their original form here.
>Manusmriti allowed ritualistic grooming kek
Marriage and sex are two different things. You can call it grooming but still its not like having sex with a female before even she has come of age.
+Cc66G
No.195875
>>195741
I'd add something here. Manusmriti is the final verdict of Brahmins only.
Other Varnas are not allowed to interpret Manusmriti.
Shudras aren't even allowed to read Manusmriti.
+Cc66G
No.195879
>>195860
>That's just typical zero self awareness pajeet baap things.
it isn't when the daughter is a grown up
1+ZqSV
No.195885
>>195865
>still its not like having sex with a female before even she has come of age
>You can call it grooming
That is grooming sirs.
>Marriage and sex are two different things
What purpose is marriage for other than to n propogate family? Do you believe in virgin birth like christcucks do lmao.
>I don't remember
Why can't you? Since you seem so confident they do fuck their siblings from those conversations.
Surely, unless you're lying(or too low IQ since you can't recall shocking conversations you had and hence probably have low functioning memory function, either ways you can't be taken seriously) because, you can definitely recall gist of the conversations and why you came to such conclusions. I want to know if what they said is indeed really shocking or your dirty horny pajeet brain interpreted it as such kek.
1+ZqSV
No.195895
>>195879
Pajeet baaps do all sorts of pajeet baap things sir, regardless of religion kek.
+Cc66G
No.195907
>>195885
>>195895
>What purpose is marriage for other than to n propogate family?
there are other purposes in Hinduism as well, like I said before there are marriages noted in Hindu scriptures where the husband/wife duo remained virgin ascetics till the end. Not everything is related to making kids in Hindu marriage. Thats why it isn't merely a contract for this world.
>Why can't you? Since you...
you are offended and now you are trying hard to discredit me by any means possible including ad-hominems. I get it but you will have to accept the differences in the perspective of Hindu and Muslim males towards the females of their own family.
Different religions give rise to different mindset. Islam is a religion of coomer mindset people thats why there are so many restrictions about covering women as if an average male is 24/7 obsessed about having sex with women anywhere.
Thats why even you believe that those girls who don't cover themselves from hair to toe are indecent.
QTc9J1
No.195910
>>195875
Its laws are implemented on all hindus
+Cc66G
No.195912
>>195895
and you cherrypicked that pic to discredit me by normalizing that behaviour since its more normalized in the mindset of Muslims.
You didn't denied it (because you can't since its significantally more prevalent in muslims) but just pushed an argument to normalize it.
+Cc66G
No.195913
>>195910
its laws are interpreted byBRAHMINS ONLY to be implemented on all hindus.
In a Brahminnical state Manusmriti will be the guiding lawbook but majority of the empires in history had been non-brahmanical despite brahmins being the top ministers in those empires.
Even the current India empire is non-brahminical despite brahmins calling the shots.
1+ZqSV
No.195920
>>195907
>duo remained virgin ascetics till the end
Okay then. So are you saying Hindu shastras asked people to marry lolis so as to stay virgins for life?
>you are offended
What if I'm? Does that give you the license lie through your teeth and spread misinformation like a brainless WhatsApp unkil lmao and all my opposition to it pointless lmao.
>accept the differences in the perspective of Hindu and Muslim males
So far you've not given me one concrete reason lmao. Even the muzzie guy above was surprised at your revelation and all you got as proof of your own 'experiences' that you refuse to talk about to even begin with(Believing they are true is a different matter).
>Islam is a religion of coomer mindset people
Most religious places are high in rates of rape and pretty low in women's safety. But that's more to do with wealth than anything else.
>many restrictions about covering women as if an average male
Similar restrictions exist in all religions kek. The only part Islam tells you to cover extra from the typical Hindu conservative morales is the head and face portion. Which is kind of understandable in the desert region that Islam developed in(Rajasthan too had similar head covering customs).
Only exceptions are religions that developed in tropical regions such as in South India or African regions where women used to walk around topless which as I previously discussed had stuff like cousin and uncle marriage aa well so how much covering up is done isn't a huge factor when it comes to judging how coomer brained that religion is kek.
1+ZqSV
No.195927
>>195912
>cherrypicked
As opposed to you cherry picking one example you can't even provide proof of but just claim you know happened to someone you know kek? Cry my a river lol.
>You didn't deny it
How can I deny something I've never seen and only believe your hearsay lmao. Anyways smacking daughter's ass is something I expect your typical pajeet baap does do lmao and what I shared in that pic is worse than that lmao.
QTc9J1
No.195928
>>195913
Manusmriti was implemented as the hindu law code under brits too.
+Cc66G
No.195932
>>195920
>>195927
>o are you saying Hindu shastras asked people to marry lolis so as to stay virgins for life?
yes in some cases.
>Most religious places are high in rates of
>bro it happens in every religion and so and so. Islam is not particulary problematic bro.
LMAO even. Is that your cope now ?
>Which is kind of understandable in the desert region that Islam developed
I know for the fact that Muhammad revealed this verse after somebody saw his wife taking a dump. Before him the desert people were somewhat liberal in that regard irrespective of climate.
You are Sunni I take it ?
+Cc66G
No.195935
>>195928
because brits allowed it but the specific parts which they didn't liked were never implemented, like the age of marriage, divorce, treatment of widows etc among other things.
QTc9J1
No.195954
>>195935
Yes because they didn't allign with abrahmic world view
1+ZqSV
No.195960
>>195932
>yes in some cases
I wasn't asking a case by case basis. Don't try changing goalposts kek.
Did Manusmriti specifically asked men to to stay virgin for life after they married a loli lmao, that is my question.
The concept of age of consent past puberty onset is a pretty modern phenomenon that was invented due to prussian schooling system that extended the effective childhood well past pubescence. Why do you have to cope regarding Ancient Hindu laws had vision of those in the past lmao.
>LMAO even. Is that your cope now ?
It's not really a cope. Would you let your daughter out in the streets of UAE or in the streets of Bihar small town at midnight?
You do know that most people outside India see you pajeets as some kind of rape zombie npcs just like how you see muzzies here, right?
>take a dump
That's just a myth story explanation. Do you also believe stories of people doing shit because some ooga booga ancestor did some shit like throwing an axe at the sea?
The dressing of arab men is also similarly full body covering including head.
>they were pretty liberal
No society is liberal before the enlightenment sir. Having gay pedo sex before doesn't make a society liberal lmao.
>You are Sunni I take it ?
Are you this desperate to b see my uncut cock?
1+ZqSV
No.195963
>>195954
It got nothing to do with abrahamic world view lmao. Age of marriage was restricted because compulsory public schooling became a thing.
1+ZqSV
No.195969
>>195960
Anyways dressing has nothing to do with le morales as I said places where women freely walked with their tits out had shit like uncle marriages lol.
1+ZqSV
No.195973
>>195969
For instance, Hawaiian women literally married their own blood related siblings kek while women used to walk with basically what's considered bikini kek.
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1j1ns7/brothersister_marriage/
+Cc66G
No.195993
>>195960
>Did Manusmriti specifically asked men to to stay virgin for life after they married a loli
you didn't read full manusmriti it seems
Manusmriti 4.176
as far as your query is concerned I must inform you that The Baudhayana Sutra 4.1.11 says this:
" 11. Let him give his daughter, while she still goes naked, to a man who has not broken the vow of chastity and who possesses good qualities, or even to one destitute of good qualities; let him not keep (the maiden) in (his house) after she has reached the age of puberty
>oncept of age of consent past puberty onset is a pretty modern phenomenon
even the ancient people knew that Rawdogging a girl before the puberty is a sin against humanity unlike Muhammad who couldn't control his lust and now the same law is legitimized in some backward african and middle eastern islamic societies as well.
>Would you let your daughter out in the streets of UAE or in the streets of Bihar small town at midnight?
doesn't mean that one should force women to cover themselves everwhere including their own houses. Ehh.. shifting goalpoasts aren't we ?
>That's just a myth story explanation
so you are saying that women everywhere in arabian desert wore full body coverings during all seasons and even after sunset before Muhammad revealed that verse ?
>No society is liberal before the enlightenment sir
you are only talking about the societies run by rule of law. There were many other non-christian kingdoms who had different ways of living. Many of the values of such kingdoms could be considered liberal in modern sense. Ancient Greece and Pre-Christianity Rome are good examples. You are just trying to paint everything black before christianenlightnment just to cope for the wrongdoings of Muhammad's religion. I have heard this line of argument from Islamists on 4chan before as well. But trust me bro if you are debeating me with a set agenda then I must tell you that I can already see everything that you are trying to pull here.
Again are you Sunni ? I want this answer because I have some some genuine questions related to a specific difference b/w sunnis and shias theology. I just want to know what an average sunni muslim thinks of that diffrerence in daily lives.
+Cc66G
No.195995
+Cc66G
No.195997
>>195995
its the same as how muslims can't use non-sahih hadiths to back their logic.
Similarly in Hindus Vedas take primacy and other scriptures are nullified in case of contradiction.
This is one of the First Principle of post vedic hinduism.
+Cc66G
No.195999
>>195997
but if you still want to pursue this verse further then I will have to pursue auesha taking dump story as well along with many other more dirtier stories about Muhammad which will surely increase your blood pressure for the rest of the day.
pC6VA4
No.196004
>>195999
Now that's a name I haven't seen a while.
+Cc66G
No.196007
>>196004
I post here irregularly to fiddle with the domestic Jains of BhaCh. Today a few Baniyas also got caught in the crossfire.
1+ZqSV
No.196016
>>195993
>let him not keep (the maiden) in (his house) after she has reached the age of puberty
So you are manusmriti allowed grooming a loli to be your wife?
>Rawdogging a girl before the puberty is a sin against humanity
Puberty starts around 12-14 and in modern day around 10-12.
>Ehh.. shifting goalpoasts aren't we ?
Do you know what shifting goalposts means? That thread of conversation is about how rape and crimes against women are more tied to wealth. How is that shifting goalposts when I point it out lol.
>full body coverings during all seasons and even after sunset before
Have you seen pre islamic Arabian clothing? Most of it is covered except the face.
>Many of the values of such kingdoms could be considered liberal in modern sense
No they're not lol. Only civilizations that were pretty 'liberal' are usually ones that are at the height of their wealth and resource accumulation before their fall and that's more due to them owning butt fuck amount of slaves and sheit and paid by subjugation of others instead of any real principle of individual rights lol.
Ancient gayreeks who had gay pedo sex because they believe they deserve to fuck little boys because they're nobility doesn't make ancient gayreeks more liberal than industrial America who made faghots stay in closet lmao.
>Pre-Christianity Rome
Lol lmao even. Do you believe in some retarded outdated historical narrative about pre Christian Rome being liberal perpetuated by 18th century liberal historians lmao. Gayreeks is much More believable and even pre empire Rome because they had a proto liberal tradition.
>wrongdoings of Muhammad's religion.
I've not defended mommad one time in this thread lmao. I only pointed out the le argument that muzzies say 'Oh he only married and only had sex with her after puberty so it's bad' lmao which is basically admitting that mommad was a pedo groomer lmao.
>debeating me with a set agenda
Who are you lying to. You can't even get basic facts about me right other than calling me a muzzie even though I shit on all religions in this thread lmao.
>Again are you Sunni
No I'm not a muzzie. Is this the only argument you've? That I don't accept your chud incest fantasy that muzzies are fucking their sisters because I'm a muzzie?
You do know that's actually an argument against your original point right? Not that you might understand lol.
1+ZqSV
No.196022
>>195994
It is because you think Islam is a coomer religion because it tells women to cover up lol.
In case you can't follow your own logic
Islamic men fuck their sisters? Proof? Personal experiences and their religion is coomer brained. Why? Because they ask their women to cover up.
1+ZqSV
No.196029
>>195994
>>196022
So the fact that actual sister and niece fucking cultures don't bother to cover up is in fact an argument against your point that sister fucking is widespread in Islamic culture because they cover up lol.
Btw all major religions ask their women to dress modestly - be it Brahmanic Hinduism, Islam or Christianity. Only thing that puts Islam apart might be the face veil. Only ooga booga tropical ass religions with literal niece marriages as customer don't.
pC6VA4
No.196039
>>196007
I though you were banned for spamming porn
1+ZqSV
No.196042
>>196039
Kek.
rjiE7W
No.196043
>>195993
>you are saying that women everywhere in arabian desert wore full body coverings during all seasons and even after sunset before Muhammad revealed that verse
Yes sir. They wore fully covered gown and nights as well coz night in deserts are too cold.
lLPFVW
No.196048
>>195304(OP)
kek i understood the joke finally 🤣
1+ZqSV
No.196053
>>196043
Anon I don't think he has enough brain cells to understand how hot and dry climate works kek.
The best kind of clothing in such an environment is shielding yourself from the sun hence the full body gown the men and women there wear and dryness means no heat retained so nights are deadly cold. It's not their mistake retarded pajeet ass muzzies here follow the same dressing style in this tropical ass hot and humid climate.
rqzzIH
No.196054
>>196048
Explain
pC6VA4
No.196063
>>196054
that muslims fuck their sisters,
+Cc66G
No.196065
>>196016
>So you are manusmriti allowed grooming a loli to be your wife?
was your argument against manusmriti or Hinduism ?
>Puberty starts around 12-14 and in modern day around 10-12.
and Muhammad rawdogged ayesha at 9
>crimes against women are more tied to wealth
just your statement to derail the original thread. I didn't even touched that point of yours becoz it was an obvious deflection on the whole society besides Islam as an attempt to generalize those strands.
>Have you seen pre islamic Arabian clothing? Most of it is covered except the face.
see picrel
>Only civilizations that were pretty 'liberal' are usually ones that are at the height of their wealth and resource accumulation
this is bullshit, ancient pre athenian league clothing as depicted in greek art destroy your whole point. You know jackshit about ancient greeks. Just parroting some points typically given by incels with repressed sexual emotions who think that dominating women will somehow improving their situation.
>perpetuated by 18th century liberal historians lmao
see their art and frescoes, you are literally posting arguments given by low iq islamists and incels online by invalidating the learned historians who can back their studies with archaeological proofings.
Also stop using "lmao" and "lol" randomly after the end of every sentence. It makes one appear as a non serious edgy teenager online trying to "le own" his opponents by laughing in them while in reality he might be sweating profusely on his keyboard.
>It is because you think Islam is a coomer religion because it tells women to cover up lol.
this is not the only point for this conclusion of mine on Islam. There are many other tells as well. More or less its a general fact that Muslim culture is less about self control and more about retrictions.
Radical means are only indispensable for degenerates; weakness of the will or, to be exact, the inability not to react to a stimulus, is itself just another form of degeneration. Covering up women is a radical cure in Islam for preventing the coomers from raping them. Islam has turned even the family members of a woman into sexual deviants. Not saying that it is widespread in this era but it certainly inspires in that direction.
Are you Sunni or Shia ?
+Cc66G
No.196068
>>196043
nope they didn't
are you the domestic ex-muslim who still has good feelings for Islam like a typical leftist muzzie who larps as liberal while providing Fire support to the fundamentalists ?
Z2j0oP
No.196073
>>196068
Why are you arguing with him?
If he cant even comprehend the state of pakistan with its consanguinous marriages and inbreeding problems, then you're obviously engaging someone with little intellect. Find better use of youe time.
+Cc66G
No.196074
>>196063
thats what their religion inspires them to do in a indirect manner.
They can't actualize it because of some verses which banned marriage among siblings but still the inspiration remains.
+Cc66G
No.196078
>>196073
yeah its mostly useless to argue with them.
These two domestic muslims were larping as atheists but now it seems I have unveiled them.
They are standing nude with their circumcized dicks dangling, scimitar in their right hand and Quran in the left.
Thats the story of every liberal atheist ex-muslim.
+Cc66G
No.196088
>>196062
yaar those were good old times. My elder cousin bought me my first pc and I played games online because he told me that installing games from CD will infect my pc with viruses.
Z2j0oP
No.196092
+Cc66G
No.196100
>>196092
I played on armorgames, minicliip and arcadebomb.
There was another kino series by the name "Epic War". But swords and sandals was the best. The newer sword and sandals games on android are too complex for me. i like the old ones better. SaS 2 was the best.
vW6g03
No.196102
>>195698
I don't owe you anything, retarded pajeet. Think whatever the fuck you want about me even though you don't even know me. I don't give a flying fuck about it all. I'm fine with my day 2 day NEET life for whatever worth it has.
1+ZqSV
No.196109
>>196065
>was your argument against manusmriti or Hinduism ?
Manusmriti?
>just your statement to derail the original thread
How is it a deflection? There's no better indicator for how horny men in a society are other than prevalence of violence against women.
Or do you only accept evidences that only meets your standards?
>see pic related
That pic doesn't look Arabian at all. It looks more Greek inspired especially classical greek realism inspired sculpture. Are you sure it's from Arabia or you just posted some image you got from Google search?
>ancient pre athenian league clothing as depicted in greek art destroy your whole point
No they don't lmao.
Once again get rid of this retarded meme that randi dressing = liberal lmao. This doesn't apply to ancients at all. Liberal is more about principles, not how much gay sex they had our how close to bimbo their women dressed lmao.
>you are literally posting arguments given by low iq islamists
Which learned historian lmao? No historian today believe that pre Christian Rome was some kind of liberal proto enlightened haven lmao. This was actually perpetuated by enlightenment era historians much of which have been deboonked by this time. Ancient Roman Republic =/= Roman Empire.
Also art is usually depicting stuff like goddesses or temptresses and the way they dress doesn't tell us much about their attitudes towards women.
Christian art too often depicted men and women naked.
>There are many other tells as well.
Such as fantasies in your head, lmao.
>Covering up women
Every religion did lol.
>Are you Sunni or Shia ?
Ask your mum, she has seen my uncut cock.
1+ZqSV
No.196116
1+ZqSV
No.196118
>>196078
You claim I'm muslim but you do know how retarded your argument is if I'm actually a muzzie and offended by your claim that muzzies fuck their sisters? Not that your 80 IQ pajeet brain can understand lol.
+Cc66G
No.196129
>>196109
>Manusmriti?
well guess what the original convo wasn't about manusmriti. I bite you bait to clarify the position of Hinduism and not specifically Manusmriti at all. Besides I am not Brahmin so I can only produce limited sources but I have already done my part I suppose.
>That pic doesn't look Arabian at all
see these pics of pre-islamic goddesses unearthed in arabian peninsula, some might be from the region around Kaaba as well.
>randi dressing = liberal
never claimed anything like that, just gave my arguments against the schizo attitude of Muhammad about covering women from head to toe which is passed as normal by Islamists like you.
>Christian art too often depicted men and women naked
don't embarrased yourself. Those are from europe and from a era far modern in time. Historians are educate enough to make out different art movements from different eras and their relation to the reality of general masses. Many religious arts also depict humans performing supernatural tasks like lifting up mountains etc but Historians are smart enough to figure out those things.
Sunnia or Shia ?
1+ZqSV
No.196143
>>196129
>pic related
Can't you see most of them are wearing full body gowns?
Or do you not understand what a 'full body gown'?
I never made the argument that they wore hijab before lol, in case you didn't understand what full body gown means and keep posting these images of women wearing full body gowns lol.
>Schizo attitude
Most world religions had schizo attitude towards women, Islam isn't unique in it.
>Islamist like your
I don't believe in Islam, once again, ask your mom. She'll verify if I had an uncut cock.
>Those are from europe and from a era far modern in time.
And?
>Historians are educate enough to make out different art movements from different eras and their relation to the reality of general masses.
Again and?
Your point?
That they're imaginary?
>Sunnia or Shia?
Punjabi?
+Cc66G
No.196151
>>196143
khatri ho ?
SDUEkm
No.196155
chutiyon ne rakhi ke thread me apni maa chudwa li
+Cc66G
No.196161
>>196155
ye thread kisi ne musalmaan ko beizaat karne ke maqsad se banaaya tha kyunki aaj subah kuch threads rakhi ko sexualize karne ke liye bane the.
Khair mujhe kya matlab is pajeetism se.
SDUEkm
No.196171
>>196161
are madarchod UP wale katuwe musalmaan ko beizaat karne ki zarorat nahi hoti
+Cc66G
No.196183
>>196171
teri mummy k2o se lingam ho rahi hai pajeet
SDUEkm
No.196228
XI/gMi
No.196235
>>196171
ye mulla hai? wtf, why does a mulla know so much about brahminism
+Cc66G
No.196243
>>196235
i am not mulla he is just a bhaktbhangi seething at me for criticizing his papa modi.
He will give you next argument that I studied in dar-ul-uloom deoband where they taught me about Hinduism. Thats what I feeded him to make him seethe even more.
XI/gMi
No.196245
>>196243
modi bhakts are repelled by neutral intellectualism
SDUEkm
No.196281
>>196235
Aligarh ka mulla hai salla
>brahminism
brahmin aur khatriyon ki gaand chatna iska kaam hai
dono ka lund chusta hai aur obsessed hain unse
+Cc66G
No.196287
>>196281
yaar lundbhakt the only thing I care about is Aryan culture. Its natural that the castes having more aryan blood are more dearer to me than others. But still I am capable of making distinction between Muslim Aryans , European Aryans and Hindus Aryans.
You are merely a seething abbojeet.
SDUEkm
No.196290
>54 posts by this id
>no sir you are seething
lolololol
post hand with timestamp, chamar, if you are such an aryan
XI/gMi
No.196309
>>196281
Does he have a prior lore on this chan? This is the first time I am seeing that name, was he a old poster?
SDUEkm
No.196312
+Cc66G
No.196321
>>196312
lol u don't know me bhangi. don't try to associate me to /bharat/
I am the original fortune teller anon
SDUEkm
No.196323
sure thing, londu
your posting style is so obvious I knew few posts in that you were the deobandi aligarhi faggot
you admited it yourself
>>196243
>I studied in dar-ul-uloom deoband
XI/gMi
No.196324
>>196321
Og jyotish was a brahmin who picked work from his family lineage, are you the one that went by seria B(insert sexually explicit word)?
XI/gMi
No.196326
>>196312
Interesting, I never visit /bharat/ but posters there seem barely indian, most dont even know there own castes
SDUEkm
No.196327
>I'm not the chamar saar
+Cc66G
No.196331
>>196324
i am from rusty's inch. A bhangli anon worshipped me for my miracles.
then I took a long break before I appeared on 4chan /bharat/ where I feeded this bhaktabbo wrong info about me to make him seethe even more about the genetic differences in Indian population.
then I posted for some time on Dyaush's inch and finally decided to get my account banned by posting porn pics.
Now I post irregularly here, generally to fiddle with Jains and those who deny genetic differences aka sem2sem guys.
I made and posted on this thread on /pol/ btw.
https://bharatchan.com/board/pol/thread/1138
But I made many other thread on /pol/, /rta/ which are still alive. Nothing much happens here in this iteration of inch because of the initial censorship by Dyaush and one of his kutta mod.
+Cc66G
No.196332
+Cc66G
No.196334
kek this is also me btw
feeding you another lie
its hilarious that you fell for it just because i posted some clips of khadim hussain rizvi
+Cc66G
No.196340
labaik ya rasool allah
+Cc66G
No.196348
>>196347
i know you have a iq problem thats why you can't read this whole thread from start
ulmYqv
No.196556
Yaar 1 want mulli sis so i can Fuck her
L2D4zp
No.196611
>>195321
i had a mulla gf for 7yrs ,
holy cow got to know she had slept with 3 of her cousins , her younger brother, and dads friend .
she had nice boobs tho .
ADQmp4
No.197353
stay away from subhumans if you arent a subhuman. you would know what you are.
ulmYqv
No.197444
I want to fuck a mulli
