Recent Posts
Dyaush k2a hai
K7xRgi
No.195400
Always a madarchod abbu judge making these cuck remarks. No wonder so many idli chamars are into cuckoldry memes. Seriously what's wrong with these subhuman onges
V8Ogto
No.195406
>>195400(OP)
I wonder how long it would take normies to stop being reactive to cherry picked headlines from specific cases.
Idk the context here, and yes past cases can be referenced in the courts but not every statement made by judges is the final rulling nor it is applicable as a rule to the rest of the cases. In 9 out of the 10 times, media is hyperbolic clickbaiters.
I have zero interest in defending milords but anons should know this atleast. I think we have some lawyerjeet who can provide further details on this.
MMhsAv
No.195412
>>195400(OP)
Naam kaun he?
K7xRgi
No.195419
MMhsAv
No.195421
RBpgg4
No.195425
>>195418
Brvtal randirashtra
Fnfa+q
No.195427
>>195406
Gaayush madarchod Jain bhangi stop justifying the bourgeoise so that you and your fat cat buddies can get cheap workers to exploit.
Your day of reckoning is close. Prepare your ass for the gulags. Practice picking tea leaves.
MMhsAv
No.195434
>>195400(OP)
Why are pooryanis so randi rakshaki?
7/6E8m
No.195442
>>195427
he ideology is statism because Indian state extracts taxes from majority Hindus which are used to provide loan exempttion to the Jain businessmen.
He always promotes status-quo and toes the official government/official line so that his community keeps enjoying these benefits in the longer run.
K7xRgi
No.195443
>>195421
It's SuryaKant but same shit
Swh4hg
No.195444
>>195400(OP)
Why do you, as an incel, care so much about these drama? It's not like you'll get married, right?
K7xRgi
No.195448
>>195427
Jaini khud hi extinct ho jayega kuch time mein. Mere 2 friend jain rani se shaadi kar rahe hai despite me telling them not to. Unhe bhi vegcuck bana degi woh randiyan
K7xRgi
No.195450
>>195444
I care about my fellow men and their rights and want to see randijeetas suffer
V8Ogto
No.195452
>actually try to explain anons about clickbaity journalism
>nitty gritty details about judgement
>they start asking for my genocide
K7xRgi
No.195453
>>195452
Then don't be a randirakshak. We hate pajeetas here and FAP to them getting sariyad. It's inchcel culture. Don't like it? Go to your designated street of shitring - instarandigram or plebbit
MMhsAv
No.195456
>>195450
Based commissar currycel
7/6E8m
No.195458
>>195448
aise koyi extinct nahi hota. Jab population kam ho jaegi tab inke Babas inko zyadaa bacche karne ke liye force krenge aur dheere dheere inko zyadaa religious extremist bhi bnaa denge agar inhone fir bhi baat nahi maani toh.
Bhai tu khud soch ki europe mein bhi abhi tak paganism fully extinct nahi hua hai. Baar baar pagan sects reemerge hotay rehte hain. Jainism toh unn european paganisms se bhi zyadaa elaborated religion hai, aise itni aasaani se extinct nhi hoga. Bas kuch non-famous sects extinct ho sakte hain par religion chalta rahega.
Swh4hg
No.195466
V8Ogto
No.195471
>>195453
If your position is absolute then you won't need any other reason to justify your viewpoint.
If it isn't that means you care about the validity of the events to justify your viewpoint in that case the validity of news is important which is not true here - atleast the generalization.
So if it's former there's a no need of this thread, if it's later then my explanation stands and clearly you are not helping with your agenda with such posts.
V8Ogto
No.195474
7/6E8m
No.195475
>>195452
ye bhi ek trick hai minorities ki khud ko victimize bataane ki.
Baad mein issi basis pe majority ke exploitation ko justify karte hain ye.
bVnzKE
No.195476
>>195452
There is no nuance here bourgeois scum. This is legal paternity and according to Indian Evidence Act the child is assumed to be the husband's unless definite non-access is proved between the couple(not possible in vast majority of cases)
7/6E8m
No.195478
V8Ogto
No.195486
bVnzKE
No.195493
>>195486
>>only to go on and explain that there's nuance
There is no nuance. It is impossible to prove non-access unless they were living apart. It is the only scenario out of innunerable ones where a man can have hope that he won't have to raise a bastard.
L/6fYj
No.195494
>>195474
hindu baniyas have nothing to do with jains they are good people
7/6E8m
No.195496
V8Ogto
No.195497
>>195494
adani is bad but ambani is fine somehow then anon? kek.
Even that commieanon has better viewpoint than you here.
Atleast when it comes to billionaires, you can have class hate - billionaires businessmen don't care about caste/religion etc. much other than as long as it is benefitting them.
7/6E8m
No.195498
>>195494
neither hindu baniyas believe this nor jains.
they marry among each other. Keep living in delusions. Most Jains are descended from Baniyas even majority of Jains share same gotras as Baniyas. Its the same as Sikhs where the Jat, Sikhs, Khatri Sikhs and other all know about their castes.
In future if need arises these Hindus baniyas will even convert to jainism to keep Jain population afloat to a certain threashold.
Many baniyas still visit Jain temples, see the google map images of you local Jain temple and you will see Baniyas among Hindus posting most images after Jains.
V8Ogto
No.195499
>>195496
you did though anon.
>he ideology is statism because Indian state extracts taxes from majority Hindus which are used to provide loan exempttion to the Jain businessmen.
>He always promotes status-quo and toes the official government/official line so that his community keeps enjoying these benefits in the longer run.
>jain businessmen
>his community
7/6E8m
No.195501
>>195497
I am not commie but I am just observing how some minorities are flying under the radar while the average Hindu is busy struggling with Mlechhas.
I even suggest Muslims to keep an eye on Bohras and Aga Khanis. The Pakistanis on 4chan I've talked to are somewhat redpilled on Aga Khanis Nizari Islamilis.
As a non-Brahmin Hindu I consider only Brahmins as my suzerain and not other minorities.
7/6E8m
No.195503
>>195499
aren't you Jain ?
could you be more elaborate about the perceived contradiction in my statements ?
I can clarify if you are willing.
83z9ho
No.195504
Expect the quality of the genepool to rise dramatically when 6'2 chadpreets, 6'6 euro chads, 6'3 tvrkic abdvls decide to go on a semen donation spree .
OM RANDI RAKSHATHI RAKSHITAHA |
L/6fYj
No.195506
>>195498
i know am a baniya myself
marriage is acceptable but people prefer to marry in their own religion
>hindu baniyas will convert to jainism
never gonna happen
L/6fYj
No.195507
>>195504
>t. cuck fetish katuwa
83z9ho
No.195508
>>195507
pyaari, I'm just retvrning to my hindv roots.
7/6E8m
No.195509
>>195506
already happening.
Which state are you from ?
because Baniyas outside Gujarat are politically tied to Hindutva ideology for "obvious reasons". So they could never thing of converting to any other religion including Jainism.
L/6fYj
No.195510
>>195497
both adani and ambani are fine as long as they worship the lord of the lords narendra modi
83z9ho
No.195512
meri pyaari honda sherni can finally have a child of european stock using the money of a poor betabuxx jeet
V8Ogto
No.195513
>>195503
i was merely pointing about generic anon seethe against 'jains and baniya' both are used together by anons most of the times without any exclusions.
Also include hate against gujjus.
Only thing i would say if you are hating these communities because of my perceived relationship with them then it's proly not worth it. If it's other separate criticism that i understand.
V8Ogto
No.195515
>>195510
based
L/6fYj
No.195516
>>195513
for them marwadi baniya jain gujrati all are same
aA/XBP
No.195518
>>195510
Chhi, modi tatti kyu chaat rha hai
L/6fYj
No.195519
>>195509
>politicaly tied to hindutva ideology
aA/XBP
No.195525
>>195516
marwadi is just a regional identity, brahmin, rajput, baniya, jain anyone can be a marwadi
aA/XBP
No.195527
>>195525
Gujarati too.
aA/XBP
No.195528
Btw these days even telis have started using baniya surname, you might want to check-in on that.
aA/XBP
No.195529
>>195528
surnames*
7/6E8m
No.195531
>>195513
I have nothing to add anything more. I've already said everything.
>>195516
nope. Hindu Baniyas are still tolerable because its their religious duty to engage in making moey. The only criticism is that they should stop mingling (having martial relations) with Jains.
>>195519
you've got a better word ?
aA/XBP
No.195537
>>195532
Lindiandus have inferiority complex, they hate anyone that becomes successful
aA/XBP
No.195538
>>195534
Most likely a modh baniya from Gujarat, his phenotype matches too.
V8Ogto
No.195539
>>195534
He is a billionaire, mitra of modi, destroyer of slums, uplifter of slumjeevis, the unstoppable force of development, the builder of MIC, crown priest of vertical integration and the faustian OBC destined to dethrone traditionalist billionaire and rent seekers like Tata and Ambanis.
L/6fYj
No.195540
>>195531
hindu baniyas are jainified tbh
especially in RJ and GJ
but yeah newer generation is more tilted towards BJP hinduism
its just old uncles with jain friends who visit jain temples and aunties who dont eat pyaaj lahsun in savan copying jains
like blaady what
>stop mingling with jains
marriage has more to do with caste then religion
my great grandma herself is jain
but it isnt that much common people prefer to marry in their own religion
L/6fYj
No.195541
>>195537
this
L/6fYj
No.195542
V8Ogto
No.195547
>>195543
Adani is godsent when you realize the people who are opposing and nurtured a situation of slumjeevis are like pic related.
>Lastly, Dharavi is a living, breathing ecosystem and you sir, cannot treat Dharavi as a project for profit and some twisted sense of self aggrandisation. Dharavi doesn't need your saviour complex, people here are self made and have built a marshy land into a thriving economic hub, that too without being granted undue favours by friends in high places. Dharavi, I will have you know sir, has far more dignity than any of your businesses will ever achieve.
>Mr. Adani, you have only one agenda - Garib Hatao, Dharavi Mitao, Mumbai Looto, Adani City Basao.
I wish we had more billionaires like adanis and lesser leaders like Gaikwad.
Bring some law and give Adani enterprises incharge of every top 100 city once they are done with the dharavi redevelopment. Upliftment shouldn't stop.
7/6E8m
No.195548
L/6fYj
No.195551
>>195548
what?
7/6E8m
No.195552
>>195542
adani is not OBC.
give source for his caste before declaring any conclusions.
Also what castes do his daughters-in-law belong to ?
Ambani himself married a Brahmin female.
Baniyas marry Upper Caste when they become rich.
aA/XBP
No.195553
>>195547
I am not even a librandu like picrel, that meme was just a lighthearted remark on your glaze.
7/6E8m
No.195556
>>195551
i have seen many such baniyas who have someone Jain in their family.
It just tells how closely Jains and Baniyas are to each other.
Baniyas will even betray fellow Hindus to side with Jains.
aA/XBP
No.195560
>>195552
Adani's son (jeet adani) married a hindu baniya it seems.
aA/XBP
No.195566
>>195560
second son too.
jVu56p
No.195571
>>195400(OP)
Someone impregnate milards wife
7/6E8m
No.195572
and in this spirit I made this thread
https://bharatchan.com/board/rta/thread/476
but they successfully derailed it
FgmBV6
No.195573
aA/XBP
No.195579
>>195572
That thread is loaded with librandu talking points, I don't support that retardation.
7/6E8m
No.195580
>>195573
>baniyas are uppercaste pyaare
baniyas are not "UpperCaste".
Read scriptures carefully. They are the lowest Dwijas.
A Kshatriya/Brahmin marriage is not considered as immoral as a Vaishya/Brahmin marriage and that tell you something.
Anyway I never target baniyas. I am only concerned about Jains.
>blood above religion
there you are letting your mask off. Your vile countenance is apparent.
aA/XBP
No.195581
>>195573
I understand that wealth is a big part of vaishya-dharma, anon but I still find this logic flawed, suppose you were to marry a Jain baniya, would your children embrace your hindu traditions or their jain traditions? Dont say both since most people dont even have time to embrace traditions from one side. not to mention how many other identity problems it could lead to.
7/6E8m
No.195582
>>195581
You are too naive
aA/XBP
No.195584
>>195581
and it you just embrace money based traditions some retards will even use it to justify mixing with unrelated merchant classes/communities in few years. Mixing leads to dilution of identity, no other way around it.
aA/XBP
No.195585
>>195584
if*
7/6E8m
No.195587
>>195584
what is your caste pyaare ? just tell the ctegory if you are uncomfortable.
V8Ogto
No.195590
>>195581
>>195584
How much do you know about hinduism itself saar? According to trads like '7/6E8m', half of the hindus are not heendoos.
>>195580
>literally discriminating against shudras and non-brahmin non-kshatriya dwija.
>somehow jain are the only issue
Anon the cognitive dissonance among people like you is hilarious.
I wonder how 50% of the hindus feel about people like you.
FgmBV6
No.195592
>>195580
so you expect us to worship brahmins
baniyas are way more conscious about religion and purity then brahmins
aA/XBP
No.195596
>>195587
Lohana
7/6E8m
No.195597
FgmBV6
No.195598
7/6E8m
No.195599
>>195596
u gujarati ?
FgmBV6
No.195600
>>195597
29
JQvFQk
No.195604
>>195599
Sindhi, I won't get into the specifics here.
JQvFQk
No.195605
>>195590
>How much do you know about hinduism itself saar? According to trads like '7/6E8m', half of the hindus are not heendoos.
Unrelated.
JQvFQk
No.195608
>>195598
This post doesn't even deserve a reply, but still, have your (You).
7/6E8m
No.195618
>>195604
the surname "-ani" gives it I guess but do you have any source ?
7/6E8m
No.195620
>>195600
Yaar don't lie lalaji. There are only two posters here that are above 28.
Again tell your real age this time. As you can see I have nothing against baniyas. I am only concerned about Jains.
V8Ogto
No.195625
JQvFQk
No.195628
>>195618
as I said, I won't get into the specifics about my surname here.
7/6E8m
No.195629
>>195625
You are on my target. Don't try to deflect this on Baniyas. I understand very well what you are exactly trying to do here in this post.
ociThG
No.195631
>>195620
13
ociThG
No.195632
>>195628
lalwani
7/6E8m
No.195635
>>195628
yaar i was talking about adani not yours.
Lohanas got fucked up really bad in two waves-
1st by Aga Khanis conversions.
2nd by Partition.
I feel sorry for you in the same way I feel sorry for Khatris but both of your communities are educated hard-working people so you emerged out to be well once again.
V8Ogto
No.195636
>>195629
>you are on my target
the very basis on which you made me target is flawed anon.
>i have nothing against baniya
you literally almost implied that baniyas are lesser humans than non-brahmins and non-kshatriyas >>195580
Let's not even get into your thoughts about shudras which quite literally won't be liked by most here.
It's hilarious that despite all of this somehow you think baniyas would consider you as their well wishers. Let alone shudras.
7/6E8m
No.195638
ociThG
No.195639
>>195636
based
7/6E8m
No.195641
>>195636
>baniyas are lesser humans
my exact words were "Baniyas are lowest Dwijas".
In Hinduism we have a system of heirarchy called Varnashrama. A jain who either relies on hypocricy or Hindu Khastriyas for warfare won't understand this.
JQvFQk
No.195642
>>195635
I doubt if adani is a sindhi, some baniyas also have ani suffix surnames like Kesarwani.
>i feel sorry for you.
You don't need to.
7/6E8m
No.195644
V8Ogto
No.195645
>>195641
>my exact words were "Baniyas are lowest Dwijas".
>In Hinduism we have a system of heirarchy called Varnashrama.
Yeah wonder what that hierarchy means to you 
Why would you find issue in marriage of two groups in the vanashrama for no reason other than the fact that you consider one community lower than the other.
>a jain either relies on hypocrisy
i am quite literally just resharing what you said anon please.
i already said if you are seething at jain because of perceived notion that i am jain then you are doing a huge mistake.
7/6E8m
No.195647
>>195642
most sindhis belong to vaishya tribes of sindh so its no wonder that many of them are actually baniyas from sindh.
>You don't need to.
I know but its just a general feeling which arises when something wrong happens to a fellow of my own religion especially when the mlechhas are involved.
But nevermind.
ociThG
No.195648
>>195642
the superior kshatriya got fucked up by muslims
and these subhuman losers think they are superior to us just cuz some 2000 year old text creates a imaginary varna system
JQvFQk
No.195650
>>195636
Caste based identity have nothing to do with Brahmins or Kshatriyas, these are based on your own caste's cultural and genetic continuity.
JQvFQk
No.195652
>>195648
I don't support Hierarchy.
7/6E8m
No.195653
>>195645
>Why would you find issue in marriage of two groups in the vanashrama for no reason other than the fact that you consider one community lower than the other.
Its a shame that no learned Brahmin poster is present in this thread when I really need them. You can make a seperate thread criticizing Varna system and I will justify it in that that thread whole heartedly. I don't want to derail the convo here by opening up another topic.
JQvFQk
No.195655
>>195647
Castes in sindh are a bit different from rest of india, but that's a topic for another thread
V8Ogto
No.195657
>>195644
I didn't care about that post because you misunderstood that i was calling you commie rather i was referring to other anon talking about revolution. So there was no point replying to you.
>>As a non-Brahmin Hindu I consider only Brahmins as my suzerain and not other minorities
We are not interested in being your 'suzerain' though. Sounds like you tried to invent some victimization cope.
>hindus are facing malechchas
Current day hindus are busy going for neck of other hindus due to the same 'varnashrama' you were quoting saar. Maybe you agree about that 'suzerian' most of of the hindus won't agree even in your own caste. But that's for another day.
7/6E8m
No.195659
so am I dealing with 5 Baniyas here in this thread ?
Everyone seems to be trashtalking against varnashrama.
yaar blaady I am not even a Brahmin. Reham Karo.
ociThG
No.195660
>>195652
do your family follow any rituals which are specific to your caste?
are there temples of jhulelal in india?
why is kiara's ass so ugly?
do you woship your ancestors?
do you know about your kuldevta/kuldevi?
do your communtiy have gotra system?
am just curious
ociThG
No.195662
>>195659
>non brahmin sucking brahmin cock
this is how brahmins were able to rule india for 3000 years
7/6E8m
No.195663
>>195655
hmm. interesting. I am making a thread on thi in /rta/. I am really curious about this.
ociThG
No.195664
either remove the varna system from hinduism or consider baniyas as brahmin
cuz neither are we going to consider brahmins as our suzerain and nor are we going to change our religion
7/6E8m
No.195665
>>195660
>are there temples of jhulelal in india?
kekda yaar I also asked the same question in my thread on /rta/
https://bharatchan.com/board/rta/thread/658
I am adding yoor questions in that thread as well.
Don't start this convo here.
7/6E8m
No.195666
>>195664
>either remove the varna system from hinduism or consider baniyas as brahmin
V8Ogto
No.195667
>>195659
>varnashrama
I have defended same thing in the past, in fact i don't even hate it. But my notion was always to project it as every group being equally irreplicable clog in the system like that.
When you demonize one group by saying they are lowest of a group or subgroup it won't go well with most of the peeps among them. It may come across as preachy or even some sort of 'mercy' that we grant you some seat among us but don't think you are equal to us. There's no need of such statements.
Better answer i will give myself, it's both lineage and cultural thing. In past there was no actual good incentive for most to bother with rituals and practices and suffering a brahmin etc. had to go through to reach the level of learned person aka Brahmin.
Same goes for kshatriya, they had to put their state before their family and loved ones. These were certain qualities demanded off them.
Vaishyas had it easier.
Shudras had the least restrictions and they also played the role in society but the restrictions were limited but there were another set of restrictions.
In general each group has certain set of adhikaras which did justice as long as society was mostly resource abundant.
Once the plight started it failed pretty much, though one good thing was that lineage and learning was tied. Thanks to brahmins hinduism survived.
Every bunch tried as much as they could, kshatriyas, vaishyas..shudras...
Everyone suffered, some worse than others...
Those who want to find a way to demonize a group out of that they can can't be helped.
7/6E8m
No.195669
>>195667
create a thread on /rta/ and copy your reply to that thread.
I won't reply in this because this thread will soon be archived.
V8Ogto
No.195670
>>195667
>Thanks to brahmins hinduism survived.
Tbh this would be incorrect. brahmins were major to ensure that the rituals survived.
But average hindu - every group ensured that they were folloing their kula god/goddess and did everything to ensure the continuation.
p++TdA
No.195686
>>195543
but adani is a true nation builder, gayaush ain't dickrindin this time
7/6E8m
No.195712
>>195686
the conversation wasn't about adani. Don't try to deflect by posing him as a scapegoat.
7/6E8m
No.195722
>>195717
u r the only sane person in this thread among these 5 jain/baniyas
Gayk2n
No.195819
>>195400(OP)
Randis engagement farming like usual.
This is an old OLD section from Evidence Act, 1872 and the Supreme Court is just repeating and interpreting what is already written in law.
With so much advancement in science such as DNA profiling, they could've amended this section. Hell, they even completely changed evidence act to bharatiya sakshya adhiniyam to wipe the blaady britisher backward laaas. But you know what they changed? Nothing. They just swapped the serial numbers of sections and added a few extra things here and there and called it a day. Truly vishwaguru move.
But yeah, keep blaming the Supreme Court, like it's responsible for making the laaas.
Gayk2n
No.195832
>>195406
Yaar the praablem lies with our legislature. The supreme court can't pull laws out of their ass. Yes, they can strike down unconstitutuonal laws but they can't just write a new law. They have to work within the framework and follow what is written in the books. The power to amend and change things lies with the blaady legislature and our legislature is fucking incompetent.
7/6E8m
No.195833
>>195474
what is that other flag in that pic ?
Gayk2n
No.195857
>>195840
No idea yaar. More people should talk about how shitty some of these old laws are.
But I'm still salty about the fact how they wiped the old laws for new laws without any remarkable changes. They literally just ctrl+c and ctrl+v 95% stuff and bragged about wiping old colonial laaas.
Certain laws which were there to protect men such as 377 of IPC, have been completely removed to be more progressive. But earlier, even after it was decriminalized, the section was still present in IPC to protect men from non-consensual anal harrasment. Consensual stuff was decriminalized but rape was still rape. Now? They just nuked that section from BNS, essentially leaving a lacuna which is hard to fill because the section for rape is not gender neutral. It is only for women. But for men, the only protection of 377 has been nuked, leaving our asses literally unprotected as it is no longer a crime to rape an adult man. This stuff is actually really scary.
Stay safe out there yaaron.
Gayk2n
No.195861
>>195858
kek just noticed
V8Ogto
No.195863
>>195857
well it would have been pretty much impossible to change so many laws in one go but i do agree with the rest of the stuff that old laws etc. should be changed.
!024Jj6WZIDQIo9s
V9u2IU
No.196056
>>195452
Kekek
6p4e0e
No.196057
how did randidom seething turn into caste kanging? Randirakshaks are working overtime I suppose
A97E9E
No.196361
How do you guys manage to drag brahmins into any thread about state of India? Its annoying to see people scapegoat brahmins for all shortcomings of their own communities or religion, Brahmins did not even have a significant population outside of Uttar pradesh. Its retarded to think a population this insignificant could influence entire demographics to do or not do something, also these people conveniently blame brahmins while ignoring all atrocities committed by non brahmin dominant castest with larger populations. Nobody was preaching anything to anyone, your ancestors chose to become Warriors, clerks, merchants, farmers etc while mine chose to became priests, priesthood doesn't even pay much. Nothing more, nothing less.
76su/K
No.196365
>>196361
brahmin playing victim card after committing 13 genocides and 1000+ massacres
7/6E8m
No.196367
>>196361
this time its your favourite baniyas doing the needphul
76su/K
No.196371
A97E9E
No.196374
A97E9E
No.196376
this is even funny to me cause commie hate baniyas too, dont believe me? Visit JNUs, I dont support caste based hate towards any other community and strictly against Heirarchy, wherw they lose me is when they talk about completely eradicating castes, that's like saying you solve racism by erasing races.
76su/K
No.196379
>>196374
its owari da for brahmins
dalits dravidians librands muslims sikhs and many obcs are openly calling for brahmins genocide
76su/K
No.196383
7/6E8m
No.196392
>>196379
even baniyas now iy seems judging from this thread
76su/K
No.196401
>>196392
no we arent there is not a single anti brahmin thing written here
it was just one anon ( jain baniya ) questioning varna system
the thread is more like baniyas ( hindu + jain) vs poorfag hindoos
7/6E8m
No.196410
>>196401
>questioning varna system
varna system is the central pillar of hinduism. Its what makes it different from abrahimic religions. The acceptance of inequality among living beings.
3DAet2
No.196456
