Recent Posts
What is Poojeet plan to counter Porky VT-4s?
5rQMHD
No.404610
Both countries continue to deploy proper Armoured Divisions, that means tank on tank combat will be widespread in an all-out war.
The VT-4 with its FY4 ERA has around 550-700mm protection from KE projectiles.
Poojeets only widely have 3 types of AP projectiles,
1. 3BM42 Mango, issued to T72s and 90s, can't pen the VT-4 at any ranges
2. FSAPDS Mk-II, issued to T72s and 90s, prolly can't pen the VT-4 at any meaningful
3. Arjun's FSAPDS, issued to obv the Arjuns, has over 600mm of penetration, might be our best bet currently, despite all the hate Arjun receives(it was a good project, if only some design choices weren't made...), it prolly can pen the VT-4 at decent ranges, tho depending on how good DRDO's stuff is
4. 3BM60 Svinets-2, only works on T-90, afaik IA is interested but the T-90Ss we use have an older autoloader design that can't fit these larger projectiles, upgrades would be needed, these can pen VT-4s at long ranges very reliably
Conclusion, FRCV dedo jaldi se jaldi, u k the guys at IA aren't retarded, its design smartly features a bustle autoloader and a carousel one, so we can both single piece long APFSDS and dual piece HE, they will decimate VT-4s, inshallah.
tNUVAB
No.404616
5rQMHD
No.404620
>>404616
As funni as those incidents were, we shouldn't grow irrational, they were being used for indirect fire without proper maintenance of any kind.
