Recent Posts
Just discovered i am INTP personality type going by MBTI classification.
xC/9en
No.416808
Now my entire life makes sense to me. My high intelligence and creativity yet my weird mindset, laziness, lack of ambition, disorganisation all make sense now.
Lets do a bhach survey. Post your MBTI personality type (there are 16 of them).
2DoIuT
No.416812
>>416808(OP)
this is all cope pajeet
you just don't want to work hard
admit it already or keep living in delusions
xC/9en
No.416818
>>416812
Genetic determinism is far from cope. Its brutal, blackpilling and nihilistic in essence.
vZqtVT
No.416822
>>416808(OP)
MBTI is peak midwitry. The tests basically asks wether you are X or Y and then it tells you that you are X or Y which is retarded. It doesn't synthesise anything new from the input which you give the test. Take the PAS:
xC/9en
No.416828
>>416822
You dont need to take test. If you understand yourself well, you will resonate with the description of your type. 'Thats literally me' will just click. But ig some types need tests to figure it out.
vZqtVT
No.416830
>>416828
So there is no point to the MBTI then? Anyways do the test I linked. It will ask for your name and shit at the end, just type some bullshit you don't have to sign in or anything tho.
xpWo21
No.416832
>>416808(OP)
Yeah I'm an intp too as of now 2 years ago I was intj-a i think it happened because I'm in isolation since 2 years.
78XhJM
No.416833
>>416808(OP)
Myers Briggs is outdated and has no scientific evidence
vZqtVT
No.416836
>>416833
>outdated
It was never 'indated' in the first place. It's complete nonsense with no backing.
ZyJnLS
No.416837
>>416808(OP)
nice cope
xC/9en
No.416843
>>416837
Genetic determinism is cope? Saying shit like 'just work hard vro', 'just become like that person vro', 'just change yourself vro' is actual cope.
vZqtVT
No.416844
>>416843
Take the blaady test I posted. You'll see how it mogs the fuck out of mbti.
vZqtVT
No.416846
>>416843
>genetic determinism is cope
Yes. I would say that genetic determinism has truth to it, but there are people who get so wrapped in up in genetic determinism and use it as a coping mechanism for underperforming.
xC/9en
No.416856
>>416846
The problem is free will is an illusion. Its each individual's unique brain chemistry and architecture responding to environment that produces differing personalities, mindsets, cognition and decision making. Even when we 'think freely' its our brains doing that.
vZqtVT
No.416860
>>416856
True Free will does exist. I can't prove it, but I have a framework for it, I will post it here.
vZqtVT
No.416861
>>416860
First let us understand the current materialistic paradigm: There are 2 layers: A layer A and a layer B
Layer A: This is the causal chain, one event acts as a cause for another and so on and so forth; It is deterministic
Layer B: This is the 'randomness' substrate, qauntum physics tells us that the universe at a very small scale is probabilistic. It is a probabilistic layer.
According to this framework, if accepted as true, the logical conclusion is that the universe is deterministic on a macro scale; Despite layer B being probabilistic, it can be statistically understood and hence isn't random at the macro-level. Since the universe is determininistic on a macro-scale this implies that free will, shouldn't exist.
Now let's talk about my proposed mechanism for how free will works. If a supposed free will did exist, the mechanism CANNOT exist at layer A, since layer A is a causal chain; Cause A leads to event B, Event B leads to event C and so on and so forth. However, let's look at Layer B. This is where things get interesting.
Layer B is probabilistic. However, if the probabilities are tweaked (somehow), then this will lead to a different outcome, which then affects layer A and leads to a different end result. I feel free will operates by external entities (soul, spirits, demons, whatever the fuck you wanna call it) altering the probabilities of layer B which then results in a different causal chain, and end result in layer A. This principle allows anything which has a layer A and layer B in a certain configuration (I don't know what, but this is just my speculation) to be inhabited by an entity be it a soul, demon or whatever. The corrolary is that just because something has a layer A and B in that specific configuration doesn't neccesitate that that thing is inhabited. Thus there are soulless humans; hylics as the gnostics call them.
xC/9en
No.416884
>>416861
Interesting but it goes into realm of the supernatural.
xC/9en
No.416895
Also one has to wonder how brain which is just another organ is subject to some supernatural force but not rest of your body or physical world. An 80iq person just cant turn into a 140iq genius. A 5'5 guy cant be 6'5 so why would brain be any different.
vZqtVT
No.416899
>>416884
>realm of the supernatural.
There comes a point where you must face it. I was an atheist like you at one point.
vZqtVT
No.416901
>>416895
Retard did you not read what I wrote. It comes from the configuration of the brain, and the probability substrate.
vZqtVT
No.416905
Anyways gn, am sleeping
S2JFiQ
No.416909
>>416808(OP)
Istp
xC/9en
No.416913
>>416901
What about physical world? Dont we see consistency in it? What would make brain and thoughts any different? I cant turn into a flying unicorn so why would my brain and thoughts coming from brain be any different and subject to alteration by supernatural forces. There isnt really anything special about brain and cognition biologically. Why single it out.
