Recent Posts
nN8i3Q
No.486962
>>486961(OP)
But they were bhains chor though.
4fxiPe
No.486963
>>486961(OP)
What is Gujjar?
+ibq70
No.486964
>>486961(OP)
they were in criminal tribes act.
Those martial casts which didn't supported british were put in criminal tribes.
nN8i3Q
No.486965
>>486964
A group of tribals
nN8i3Q
No.486966
>>486964
That's partially true, but even besides that they actually were thieves though.
+ibq70
No.486967
>>486965
no, it were mostly non-tribal (indian)s
+ibq70
No.486970
>>486966
do we have british police records ?
xKnAHg
No.487028
>>486966
Han bhai sab chor the, bas tere dada ne mehnat se jameen kharidi thi.
Humans evolves by taking possession of others property. Like Mughals came and Raju gave their dotters as their lund was cut by mullas kek
nN8i3Q
No.487036
>>487028
Why are you chimping out though. If nothing is wrong with it, then it shouldn't affect you. It is truth Gujjars were a bunch of tribals. They did not and couldn't buy their own buffalo to live. So they would steal them from Yadav's and other groups.
Vs4CcC
No.487043
>>487036
They were mostly peasants, Jats were too until they got some relevance after 18th century.
Yadav's were of same category.
I'm yet to see any substantial historical evidence of cattle stealing by one particular group or tribe, just like there are clear historical records of Rajput giving their underage daughters to invaders and secure their seat in royal courts.
