Recent Posts
Another evidence nlggers are built different.
What's their issue ?
What does /b/ think of John Kiriakou?
so many anons banned
Leftist euphemisms
Old unkils, why did this happen?
PSA: Update on spams on 11th March
It's gobar
@sarvam
Why is wikipedia so shamelessly anti india, anti b...
Huh
1st sem ka result aa gaya yaaron
SGTOW General #55
Mods ki Jai ho
Hindi song
Cursed decade
Rate voice on scale of 1-10.
Iran allows Indian tankers to pass through Hormuz
STOP WASTING MY TIME BHENCHOOOOOOD
Zamn
ITT share based and hindutvapilled edits
Somebody post the wo bharatchan hai mera lyrics.
ITT
:brahkum:
APEX PREDATOR LIST UPDATE
Why is wikipedia so shamelessly anti india, anti bjp and pro pakistan?

rdlW38
No.520418
I wish we could ban them or block the political articles at least but that will only give them opportunity to slander even more with 'fascism' accusations.

rdlW38
No.520420
>>520418(OP)
3bscfC
No.520423
>>520418(OP)
I guarantee you it's written by an Indian leftist, not a paki.

pHWblw
No.520427
>>520420

pHWblw
No.520446
>>520423
See how in Op sindoor article they conveniently avoid listing damages in the table. There arent even any of the satellite images of paki bases that were damaged, in the article.
2019 balakot airstrike article reeks of obvious as well.

ogSZRj
No.520447
>>520427
>the airstrike failed
Why don't they put Lehru fucking up the military org and then losing '62 on there?
Wiki is public btw and there is an entire conspiracy by leftist chamaars to rewrite history by tagging source to each other until it becomes such a mess that everyone just buys it as truth.

ogSZRj
No.520448
>>520446
Edit it yaar

pHWblw
No.520457
IjJy0p
No.520460
>>520423
+ 1

+n5WXT
No.520464
>>520418(OP)
i used to edit a lot of articles in the past. mods are very biased yaar. You can get your edits reversed even if everything is correct. There was one article which falsely claimed Islam is the largest religion in a certain town in J&K when in reality it is Hinduism. I changed it, but had to bust my ass just getting it accepted by the muzzie in charge

pHWblw
No.520469
Also see how they have been shrinking the map of mauryan empire. No other empire is represented with this 'network model'. They cant digest there was a pan subcontinental empire before mughals.
8Hk2IS
No.520470
24G6Bv
No.520472
>>520447
>until it becomes such a mess that everyone just buys it as truth
History is written by victors don&x27;t let faggots write it for you
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)

3A6zmS
No.520473
>>520469
You can't do much since the 'indologist' from India shat the so bad - intentionally that their whole idea was to maintain the status quo from the british era.
To actually have genuine research and push for those, is not going to happen. Stop wasting time on this - though i partly think this thread is a bait.

pHWblw
No.520478
And see their obvious bias in article on india. Mauryan and gupta empire are 'loose knit' apparently but not the muslim empires. Status of women declined during era of hindu empires but no mention of islamic persecution during mughal period at all
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India
>>520473
Not a bait. I have been observing the obvious wiki bias for years now.
S3KeKW
No.520481
1c4tuA
No.520484
>>520418(OP)
There are around only 500 people who moderate wikipedia among them around 1215 are those who moderate and write information about india
All of them are leftist go figure
































































