Recent Posts
Who is the King of Indian cinema ?
War 2 trailer out
6L95Qd
No.562
Brainrot action sanema
6L95Qd
No.563
>>562(OP)
limk
6L95Qd
No.564
6L95Qd
No.566
>>565
kek
NY3GcJ
No.567
>>566
I watched it on the 17th, first show and it has dreadful writing(as most MI films do) and pretty rough pacing(first half isn't very coherent) but the action scenes are good(thats what audiences are here for anyways..). There is a submarine sequence which is pure unadulterated KINONIUM (perhaps the best set piece they've accomplished). Its a 3/5 film.
6L95Qd
No.568
>>567
I have watched that too, there's not much to story tbh. Action sequence were kino - probably major reason tbh to watch these in a way. I recall the opening sequence too.
It was forgetful but i will watch new MI - whatever name there is with meme cliffhanger.
---
I agreee with overall sentiment of RGV cuz in recent times most of the mass film in India are doing numbers with similar retarded script and actions it's infuriating. Same old angri-young man repackaged with higher budget, some old actor with half of the age actress, action sequence etc.
That's why i prefer rather simple stories nowadays. Most recent i watched was that lady who gets lost in train - forgot the movie name.
NY3GcJ
No.569
>>568
>I agreee with overall sentiment of RGV cuz in recent times most of the mass film in India are doing numbers with similar retarded script and actions it's infuriating. Same old angri-young man repackaged with higher budget, some old actor with half of the age actress, action sequence etc.
I won't blame audiences for being honest about what they want. With MI you still have a story tryna take itself too seriously with a cringe script(the acting performances don't really save it either). It throws all these gizmos and meaninglessly complicated words to create a difference of rank between audience and the role the actor is playing.... (Like when they describe the 'entity' (what a terrible name) with vaguely meaningful and butchered kampewter sayience terminology, when it really ain't that deep). It really isn't considering the audience intelligent, its trying to overwhelm the audience into thinking the writing is intelligent.
(This reminds of terry A davis' quote on simplicity: 'An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity, a physicist tries to make it simple, for an idiot anything the more complicated it is the more he will admire it, if you make something so clusterfucked he can't understand it he's gonna think you're a god cause you made it so complicated nobody can understand it. That's how they write journals in Academics, they try to make it so complicated people think you're a genius')
I watched whiplash recently and holy shit man its top 3 best films of the 2010s. Tight script, great set-lighting and perfect pacing. Despite being 1hr 47min long it flies by sooo well. The character of Fletcher makes you feel immense dread whenever he is on screen, like a slasher film almost, the lead is so helpless in front of him you wonder 'what is he gonna do next?' 'how is the lead gonna come out after this?'. He's a michael myers in a 'jazz' film. The film is subtle about some things and wholly treats the audience with respect to understand these subtleties.
9JJuQu
No.570
>>562(OP)
>narthie and soythie fighting for a narthie baman hag------the movie
6L95Qd
No.571
>>569
>I won't blame audiences for being honest about what they want. With MI you still have a story tryna take itself too seriously with a cringe script(the acting performances don't really save it either). It throws all these gizmos and meaninglessly complicated words to create a difference of rank between audience and the role the actor is playing.... (Like when they describe the 'entity' (what a terrible name) with vaguely meaningful and butchered kampewter sayience terminology, when it really ain't that deep). It really isn't considering the audience intelligent, its trying to overwhelm the audience into thinking the writing is intelligent.
Ig interstellar is probably prominent example of that. It uses science terms in the most entertainment way - it does justice in that regard. Ig best part is that blackhole simulation thing which they did. To witness that itself on IMAX would be so magical.
>whiplash
interesting. haven't watched it yet.
Not exactly same but somehow i am recalling no country for old man movie.
6L95Qd
No.572
>>570
Story as old as 5000 years saaar.
