/pol/ - Politics

Discussions related to Politics.

0/4000

BharatChan Disclaimer

Notice

Before proceeding, please read and understand the following:

1. BharatChan is a user-generated content platform. The site owners do not claim responsibility for posts made by users.

2. By accessing this website, you acknowledge that content may not be suitable for all audiences.

3. You must follow BharatChan’s community guidelines and rules. Failure to do so may result in a ban.

4. By using BharatChan users agree to the use of cookies, mostly for session related to user.

A poster on BharatChan must abide by the following rules:

Sitewide Rules
You must be 18 or older to post.
Sharing personal details or engaging in doxing is strictly prohibited.
Political discussions should be confined to /pol/.
NSFW content is only allowed in /kama/.
Off-topic discussions, thread derailment, or spam may result in a ban and IP blacklist.
Pornographic content is strictly prohibited.
Any activity violating local laws is not allowed.
Acknowledge

Recent Posts

BJP-RSS chamars explain

View

View

View

Talk about mallya podcast

View

Bhaktbhangi genocide

View

View

View

Kek’d

View

the biggest challenges that Hindu castes are facin...

View

Dalit Love Trap

View

View

Nashunalist fa_shit party having a normal one

View

Lmaoooo

View

Which non-Hindu nation is most friendly towards In...

View

Bada bhai

View

View

Today is 4 June

View

literally me general - /LMG/

View

Is unity in diversity such a good thing

View

At what moment did you grow out of your Hindutva p...

View

View

As a Muslim I just wanted to ask you that...

View

poll thread

View

AASI culture thread

View

Ls of a Bengali Hindu

View

Do subnarmadans really

View

Bring back /kama/

View

Some rantings of a guy from Calcutta

View

yaar pajeet how do we fix the "Modi problem"

View

regarding ragebaits

View

View

K A S H M I R

View

Caste General

View

Aryan Pill

View

Opinions on Gaza ?

View

Manufactured Indian Hate

View

Blackpilled inecldom discord server

View

Accelerate Lundian Collapse

View

Jai Yahuda Slava Ukraine

View

View

Wrath of Telangana chad

View

Virology's dead!

View

Redpill me on Telegony and Michrochimerism

View

W.A.S.P.

View

View

will a full-blown war with pashitstan be a pyrrhic...

View

Amerigolem Troops in Bangladesh

View

Kerala sisters our response?

View

The deciding of Bharatchans leader

View

LeT Commander hoorified in pakistan

View

Anonymous

IN

n0w4vG

No.947

were indian muslims in early 1900s really getting oppressed by majority hindus? was there actually a legit threat to muslims which made jinnah push for a separate muslim majority state? or was it the two-nation theory brainrot that made him take extreme steps like direct action day which led to brutal killings? what the hell happened to the jinnah from the 1910s who used to talk about secularism, unity, and peace? was he brainwashed later or was there genuinely some nasty politics going on like congress sidelining muslim leaders and wanting a hindu-majority rule? or were the britishers the ones who messed everything up by playing divide and rule and giving special favors to muslims which led to the creation of the muslim league and increased communal tension? because muslim league was actually formed in 1906 itself since muslim elites felt congress was not really representing muslims properly. plus britishers literally gave muslims separate electorates in 1909 with the morley-minto reforms which slowly made everything more communal even in politics. and even though muslims were not getting systematically oppressed everywhere in daily life, there was a real fear that once the british left, hindus being 70 to 75 percent of the population would dominate the political system and muslims would get sidelined badly. was jinnah under some crazy pressure because of all this that he had to resort to violence? or was he just drunk on the two-nation idea? and who tf was actually at fault for this whole calamity? because around the same time even hindutva nationalism was rising, with savarkar and rss types, and some congress leaders also started getting butthurt when congress tried to join hands with muslim league, so even congress was not fully innocent. or was it all just britishers doing 4D chess and indians falling for it like clowns? i am so confused yaaro, history feels like such a complicated web of half truths and manipulation, every historian and every indians has a different version of this situation. who do we even believe kek

Anonymous

IN

OhDpTK

No.948

It was the opposite. Lindus were a continuously falling demographic

Anonymous

IN

n0w4vG

No.949

>>948

yaar actually it was not like that kek. hindus were not falling demographic in british india. if you check the official british census data properly, hindus were around 72% of the population in 1881 and even by 1941 they were still about 70%. so overall hindus remained a clear majority throughout the british rule. haa thoda in some specific regions like punjab, bengal, sindh, north-west frontier province muslims were the local majority, but that was just regional, not across all of india. muslim population did grow a bit faster in some areas because of higher birth rates and all (as mentioned), but it was not like hindus were vanishing or something kekda. the real fear was actually on the muslim side because once the britishers left, democracy would mean majority rules and hindus being 70 plus percent could easily dominate everything politically (it was just their thought, idk why they thought this). jinnah and muslim league were scared that muslims would get sidelined badly forever, not that hindus were somehow falling in numbers. if you properly read the censuses from 1881, 1901, 1931, and 1941 you will see it clearly

Anonymous

IN

n0w4vG

No.950

>>949

references used:

1881 census of british india: https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/report-on-the-census-of-british-india-taken-on-the-17th-of-february-1881-vols-i-iii/

1941 census of india:

https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.36052

Anonymous

IN

c8h2xK

No.951

>>947(OP)

He was a proxy installed by brits

Anonymous

IN

oeFcak

No.952

>>951

brits were a proxy installed by juice.

Modi is a proxy installed by Juice as well.

proof:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPjKSGmV5KU?si=UF8F79E1hffEqdp9&t=92[embed]

Aga khan was awarded padma vibhushan (2nd highest national award) by narendra modhi. Aga Khan's grandfather Aga Sultan Mahomed Shah Aga Khan was the founder of Muslim League and he was the first to champion the cause of a seperate Islamic state and despite all this modi awarded his grandson Padma Vibhushan.

Modi also supports the love jihadi Bohras.

Anonymous

IN

3U2Dz8

No.953

>>951

it’s could be true. also, muslim league was the major part of the britisher's divide and rule bs. it’s crazy how easily indians (both hindus and muslims), fell for it. if they hadn’t let religion divide them, maybe the whole story would’ve been different :pepe_wonder:

Anonymous

IN

SJNEZN

No.958

>>947(OP)

only if we bidded our time and waited for this mujeet to die of TB

Anonymous

IN

5DOcc9

No.959

>>952

>Muh jews

Kys schizo