Recent Posts
Talk about mallya podcast
Bhaktbhangi genocide
Kek’d
the biggest challenges that Hindu castes are facin...
Dalit Love Trap
Nashunalist fa_shit party having a normal one
Lmaoooo
Which non-Hindu nation is most friendly towards In...
Bada bhai
Today is 4 June
literally me general - /LMG/
Is unity in diversity such a good thing
At what moment did you grow out of your Hindutva p...
As a Muslim I just wanted to ask you that...
poll thread
AASI culture thread
Ls of a Bengali Hindu
Do subnarmadans really
Bring back /kama/
Some rantings of a guy from Calcutta
yaar pajeet how do we fix the "Modi problem"
regarding ragebaits
K A S H M I R
Caste General
Aryan Pill
Opinions on Gaza ?
Manufactured Indian Hate
Blackpilled inecldom discord server
Accelerate Lundian Collapse
Jai Yahuda Slava Ukraine
Wrath of Telangana chad
Virology's dead!
Redpill me on Telegony and Michrochimerism
W.A.S.P.
will a full-blown war with pashitstan be a pyrrhic...
Amerigolem Troops in Bangladesh
Kerala sisters our response?
The deciding of Bharatchans leader
LeT Commander hoorified in pakistan
n0w4vG
No.947
were indian muslims in early 1900s really getting oppressed by majority hindus? was there actually a legit threat to muslims which made jinnah push for a separate muslim majority state? or was it the two-nation theory brainrot that made him take extreme steps like direct action day which led to brutal killings? what the hell happened to the jinnah from the 1910s who used to talk about secularism, unity, and peace? was he brainwashed later or was there genuinely some nasty politics going on like congress sidelining muslim leaders and wanting a hindu-majority rule? or were the britishers the ones who messed everything up by playing divide and rule and giving special favors to muslims which led to the creation of the muslim league and increased communal tension? because muslim league was actually formed in 1906 itself since muslim elites felt congress was not really representing muslims properly. plus britishers literally gave muslims separate electorates in 1909 with the morley-minto reforms which slowly made everything more communal even in politics. and even though muslims were not getting systematically oppressed everywhere in daily life, there was a real fear that once the british left, hindus being 70 to 75 percent of the population would dominate the political system and muslims would get sidelined badly. was jinnah under some crazy pressure because of all this that he had to resort to violence? or was he just drunk on the two-nation idea? and who tf was actually at fault for this whole calamity? because around the same time even hindutva nationalism was rising, with savarkar and rss types, and some congress leaders also started getting butthurt when congress tried to join hands with muslim league, so even congress was not fully innocent. or was it all just britishers doing 4D chess and indians falling for it like clowns? i am so confused yaaro, history feels like such a complicated web of half truths and manipulation, every historian and every indians has a different version of this situation. who do we even believe kek
OhDpTK
No.948
It was the opposite. Lindus were a continuously falling demographic
n0w4vG
No.949
>>948
yaar actually it was not like that kek. hindus were not falling demographic in british india. if you check the official british census data properly, hindus were around 72% of the population in 1881 and even by 1941 they were still about 70%. so overall hindus remained a clear majority throughout the british rule. haa thoda in some specific regions like punjab, bengal, sindh, north-west frontier province muslims were the local majority, but that was just regional, not across all of india. muslim population did grow a bit faster in some areas because of higher birth rates and all (as mentioned), but it was not like hindus were vanishing or something kekda. the real fear was actually on the muslim side because once the britishers left, democracy would mean majority rules and hindus being 70 plus percent could easily dominate everything politically (it was just their thought, idk why they thought this). jinnah and muslim league were scared that muslims would get sidelined badly forever, not that hindus were somehow falling in numbers. if you properly read the censuses from 1881, 1901, 1931, and 1941 you will see it clearly
n0w4vG
No.950
>>949
references used:
1881 census of british india: https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/report-on-the-census-of-british-india-taken-on-the-17th-of-february-1881-vols-i-iii/
1941 census of india:
c8h2xK
No.951
>>947(OP)
He was a proxy installed by brits
oeFcak
No.952
>>951
brits were a proxy installed by juice.
Modi is a proxy installed by Juice as well.
proof:
Aga khan was awarded padma vibhushan (2nd highest national award) by narendra modhi. Aga Khan's grandfather Aga Sultan Mahomed Shah Aga Khan was the founder of Muslim League and he was the first to champion the cause of a seperate Islamic state and despite all this modi awarded his grandson Padma Vibhushan.
Modi also supports the love jihadi Bohras.
3U2Dz8
No.953
>>951
it’s could be true. also, muslim league was the major part of the britisher's divide and rule bs. it’s crazy how easily indians (both hindus and muslims), fell for it. if they hadn’t let religion divide them, maybe the whole story would’ve been different
SJNEZN
No.958
>>947(OP)
only if we bidded our time and waited for this mujeet to die of TB
5DOcc9
No.959