Recent Posts
Are races genetically real or social construction
/ko4Rm
No.328737
Do races even have any biological basis or is it just different phenotypes adapted to their respective environments?
Au4kOe
No.328738
well said, you are a NEET tho.
eDerlj
No.328758
>>328737(OP)
It is not grounded in biology https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africa
Xr1oRS
No.328770
>>328737(OP)
>races even have any biological basis
>different phenotypes adapted to their respective environments
Anyways, if you classify by genetic distance, the races are - Austranesians, Native Americans, West Africans, South Africans, East Africans and Eurasians. You could argue Eurasians are two groups, Caucasians and Mongoloids but they only seperated very recently(~50kya).
I have used mostly geographic isolation to define 'race' here, so mostly groups that are isolated for at least 50kya(Almost half the amount homo sapiens have been around) geographically with little intermixing, not the retarded mutt definition that thinks whites are a different race from Arabs or Indians or Africa is one race.
haB3oK
No.328773
>>328737(OP)
Just like tiger and lion are same race
Xr1oRS
No.328776
>>328770
Also some quick search tells me Andaman islanders are also a 'different' race as they seperated from other austranesians very long ago.
OWIQQW
No.328778
>>328770
>not the retarded mutt definition that thinks whites are a different race from Arabs or Indians or Africa is one race.
This. Which is why I like sticking to the genetic classifications instead. Everything else is pretty much arbitrary and retarded, whites thinking all whites are same and all african are one race is equally retarded, but most timmies are too stupid to to know otherwise
eDerlj
No.328783
>>328770
Nobody is asking for your personal opinion ponge, do you have any scientific sources for the shit you just pulled from your gaand
Xr1oRS
No.328794
>>328783
What kind of scientific evidence are you seeking? That these groups have been separated? It's scientifically attested dude.
https://factually.co/fact-checks/history/native-american-occupation-north-america-1f058a>>328783
Xr1oRS
No.328800
lckPJX
No.328803
>>328773
>Just like tiger and lion are same race
They are not, they both are same class, and can not produce non-sterile offspring, they simply end up sharing same panther classification
Xr1oRS
No.328805
>>328783
On separation of East and West Eurasians
eRXO7f
No.328807
v0P7wV
No.328810
>>328794
It doesn't need to be proven, the segregation of ethnic groups based on actually genetic group rather than phenotype was done eons ago, it is only retards who lack the ability to read basic english and want it to be simplified further for them
KATh0Q
No.328813
>>328737(OP)
>it just different phenotypes adapted to their respective environments?
Obviously. Thats what it is
eDerlj
No.328819
>>328794
That's your evidence? That link leads to nowhere. There were people "within" the same races that have been separated too, it means nothing. At best it will result in phenotypic differences which is exactly what happened. If two organism can breed fertile offsprings, they are just one category taxonomically. Furthermore the fact there are more genetic differences and variations within the same races than outside of it (source: the link I posted) completely disproves the idea of races
Xr1oRS
No.328854
>>328819
>There were people "within" the same races that have been separated too
Have they been geographically isolated, with little interaction for over 50k yearsblike the Andamans and South Africans have been?
>At best it will result in phenotypic differences which is exactly what happened.
Not quite. There's always founder effect.
>the fact there are more genetic differences and variations within the same races than outside of it
Did you actually read what it was saying?
Xr1oRS
No.328855
VEaVw7
No.328873
>>328737(OP)
>Environment evolves a population to a certain direction
Congratulations you discovered natural selection and darwinism
Xr1oRS
No.328893
>>328819
Also
> fact there are more genetic differences and variations within the same races
This claim have been deboonked many times, ho search Lewtonian's fallacy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Genetic_Diversity:_Lewontin%27s_Fallacy
We wouldn't be able to find geographical location of a body or skeleton of this was true.
Xr1oRS
No.328920
>>328893
Or rather more a debunk of the pop sci understanding of the claim. Lewtonin was claiming about the frequency of genes shared but with a gene, there's huge variation. Sortb of like sum of all odd numbers and even numbers to 100 is almost same but the individual numbers aren't. Basically, we aren't closer to Bananas than we are to Cockroaches just because both only share 60% genes with us.
yK++38
No.328943
Interesting poster
>draw non white men as ugly
>but draw a gigachad for the white man
>put him in the very centre
They always choose their best to represent themselves while using our averages (and sometimes our worst) to represent us
Xr1oRS
No.328951
>>328943
Should edit in mr beast as representative of white
yK++38
No.328995
>>328943
How whites portray themselves vs what most of them look like
aJfFnt
No.329067
>>328737(OP)
Race is more than just skin colour. Races differ in iq, temperament, skull structure, brain size, hormone levels and even oral microbiota. You should watch some videos by Jared Taylor.
Now where we draw the line and how a society chooses to classify someone is somewhat arbitrary and is a social construct but the biological reality of race i.e. concentration of certain genes isnt a social construct. Just like how colours exist on a spectrum and no one can say how many colours are there, but we all know and can categorise colours despite that.
