/b/ - Random

^

loc-CH

>>368612 What's interesting in this is how progressively over the past 20 years the Steppe people have become darker and darker. I remember 20 yrs ago people used to say that Steppes were all blonde blue eyes. Then it became , they were White and not blue eyed. Now it's at - they weren't even White but olive/dark skinned. . Basically you can see the progression heading towards -> Steppe people looked more like Indians than anybody else (which was the OOI theory in the first place).

^

loc-CH

>>368628 Except Wignats don't consider Indians to be "White" in any case. From a physical anthropological view Indians are very clearly "Caucasian". But in the wignat narrative it's very important that Aryans are not from India. They did the same thing to the ancient greeks (and romans) btw - they just say that at the very least, the ruling class of these civilization were nordic ("blonde + blue eyed"). However in the case of Steppe people there are actual remains and they don't line up with the narrative. Anyway, it's very likely the Aryans originated in India as a continuation of the IVC. Just another L for the West/"Whites".

^

loc-CH

al9olbnrk5.jpg

>>368639 Reconstructions are mostly 99% fake and made up. Soft parts completely vanish on a skull. This includes lips, nose, eyes, ears, and also joints which means the mandibular bone is missing in 90% of all remains in humans.

^

loc-CH

>>368648 There is no such thing as "high" or not "high" R1a. R1a is a haplogroup mutation , not a % based indicator. You can't have 99% R1a and somebody else 50%. You either have the mutation or you don't. That's why these haplogroup studies are mostly useless nonsense. Some guy having an Indian father 300 years ago can have R1a just like your father can have it.

^

loc-CH

>>368649 Yes if they draw an indian man then he will look Indian. How is this related to the truth or reality?

^

loc-CH

>>368662 Yes those are mostly meaningless. Haplogroup mutations have no correlation to race at all. Some guy in africa who happened to have an Indian great-great-great-great-great-great-great Grandafther will have R1a too. Yet you would never consider him "Indian, Aryan" or w/e. The only useful case for these haplogroup mutations is that they can prove a founder effect (i.e. one guy repopulated an entire area with his descendants). Otherwise there is no use case for these mutations since they can be introduced at any time and you can't tell when they were introduced (and by whom). For example you can go to Africa have a son with a black woman, then 1000 years later that African comes back and has a son with an Indian woman - that Indian son will have R1a but a completely different race.

^

loc-CH

>>368665 You don't understand what haplogroup mutations are. Some dalit having R1a and a brahmin having R1a are "equal" in terms of "DNA". They both have the same male ancestral line. If anything more brahmins having R1a just means that at some point in history, people with this anecstral male line used to have more children. Actually not even that, because dalit with R1a could have died out, been killed etc. That's all. R1a is completely useless to make any statements.

^

loc-CH

>>368680 No it doesn't. A single person with R1a can come to your village. And have 1 child only. It's still possible that 100% of that village end up having R1a 10000 years later. Do you understand how sex works and how bebbies are made?

^

loc-CH

>>368683 There is no such thing as "steppe ancestry".

^

loc-CH

>>368686 xD this is essentialyl a random number and word salad anyway im going to go work stop being a muslim in real life

Anonymous

loc-FI

e50e5ccbf17c219a (2).jpg

>>368612 The white skin gene actually comes from the finnic people. Not from indo-europeans.

Anonymous

loc-FI

kuva.png

>>368632 >From a physical anthropological view Indians are very clearly "Caucasian". If I would see this albino jeet in some rural bar here, i would just think he is a local.