Recent Posts
uL3heT
No.381937
[Server: कुछ नहीं था]
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
h7505r
No.381942
aLzHDx
No.381947
>>381942
HD print aagya kya pirated websites pe?
h7505r
No.381948
>>381947
Naa i will go to watch kinodhar this weekends.
WDcdlm
No.381951
>>381947
There won't be any up until it's OTT release
NZoW5I
No.381953
>>381947
Iss anti natnl ko ban karo mods
h7505r
No.381969
>>381962
They will probably delay the ott release to feb 2026 nearby the second part release of the movie.
aLzHDx
No.381973
4rXflL
No.381998
>>381978
This is sad yaar honestly.
G7nNxl
No.382001
>>381978
Who's to blame here other than jeets themselves, no one would buy it aside from a few kino enthusiast autists
c4MM0b
No.382002
>>381978
>physical media releases on 4K blu-ray with HDR sadly there's no market for such things in lundia
these soulless drones are content with watching low quality shitty camrips instead of just going to your nearest soynema you really expect them to give a shit about ownership and movie archival? kek
bR6Ooc
No.382005
>>381935(OP)
>which one is the best?
They are both different kinds of movies. Animal is protagonist centered ensemble while dhurandhar is character study with an ensemble setting. In short, animal is MC centric movie entirely with main character journey, psyche, personality being the main focus. While dhurandhar leads on a much bigger multiple side characters plot. They are not the same type of movies so hard to compare. Baby(Akshay) is more comparable to dhurandhar and animal is more comparable to agneepath
4rXflL
No.382006
>>382002
Shouldn't the artists or creators themselves care about it though? Nolan himself ensures that there are bluray releases so that audience or those interested can have one physical copy.
It's very lazy of the producers to not do so.
4rXflL
No.382007
>>382005
Good Post. And both movies are well made in their specific 'genre'.
0j6veO
No.382009
pzgOM/
No.382010
dfAMMy
No.382011
>>381935(OP)
Both are bhangi slop
4rXflL
No.382012
Dhurandhar — 6 days BookMyShow tickets sold.
Day 1 - 376K
Day 2 - 462K
Day 3 - 490K
Day 4 - 378K
Day 5 - 408K
Day 6 - 444K 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Does anyway have data from animal? I hate discussion about numbers or profit of movies but just want to see the footprint.
c4MM0b
No.382021
>>382006
preservation and integrity are sadly exclusive to the west and to have things like archival copies and blu-ray releases there should be enough people to give a shit about it or to have enough disposable income to sell and buy
unfortunately there's isn't much of a incentive here and only a subset of the cinema and art films gets this special treatment; ie look at the classics like Sholay getting a directors cur re-release
for most producers movies today are simply an money making schemes where they wouldn't need to give a single hoot about after audience have left with a financially successful box-office
j7C+VM
No.382026
>>382012
Did you take this from jhaantgpt? If yes then ask it for animal too
4rXflL
No.382027
>>382021
>Sholay getting a directors cur re-release
>for most producers movies today are simply an money making schemes where they wouldn't need to give a single hoot about after audience have left with a financially successful box-office
Agree and have heard really bad reviews about it due even songs have been changed.
4rXflL
No.382029
>>382026
I got it from twitter box office acount tried searching for animal but couldn't find.
c4MM0b
No.382040
>>382027
>bad reviews about it due even songs have been changed.
damn that sucks
was thinking about watching it since its supposed to be watched on big screen
0iq8GH
No.382053
>>382011
This. Havent watched dhurandhar but dont get the hype around animal. It was underwhelming.
ulvvHP
No.382103
>>382001
>>382002
>>382006
>>382021
Lundians are just way to poor to own 4k OLED TVs and Blu-Ray players that said, physical media has always been superior to streaming whether it be audio or video.
A 4k blu ray with HDR is capable of providing better A/V than cinemas even.
Timmies have dedicated companies that solely perform the task of restoring old movies shot on 35mm film and releasing them on blu ray
c4MM0b
No.382110
>>382102
you dont even need 4k displays to enjoy high bitrate 4:4:4 lossless streams even 1080p can do but what percentage the population can even afford a PS4/5 or a discrete blurei player let alone movie disc's? not many I dont think even 98% of our country knows things such as bluray exists or thay music used to come on CD's first as albums kek
>Timmies have dedicated companies that solely perform the task of old movies shot on 35mm film and release them on blu ray
reminds me of this video I watched a while ago where even hobeyist and kinoautists step in when professionals are doing substandard work and scanning dupe films themselves
ulvvHP
No.382154
>>382110
Yep even a full HD blu ray disc has higher bitrate than the vast majority of streaming services lol and keep in mind that 1080p blu ray is like 20 year old tech at this point
>I dont think even 98% of our country knows things such as bluray exists or thay music used to come on CD's first as albums kek
it seems like jeets skipped the physical media age entirely and went straight to streaming after Jio bhangis gained dominance really brutal
>reminds me of this video I watched a while ago where even hobeyist and kinoautists step in when professionals are doing substandard work and scanning dupe films themselves
If you're on private torrent trackers you'll find many Open matte releases of older movies shit on 35mm film made by hobbyists crazy stuff
i watched Spiderman 2002 and traffic 2000 on open matte the difference is clear
film> digital anyday
c4MM0b
No.382170
>>382154
>it seems like jeets skipped the physical media age entirely and went straight to streaming after Jio bhangis gained dominance really brutal
I was born in the early 2000s and my dad bought a DVD/CD player when economy wasn't in absolute gutter. I remember the first movie I ever watched on it was the Mr. Bean holidays and have many kino memories attached to it. So we definitely didn't completely skipped the physical state plus I remember people collecting and cherishing their Vinyl and Red Book CD's
>film > digital anyday
true silver halide emulsion is inherently superior when it comes to image rendering and texture but there's a caveat to it, film doesn't age well like literally it fucking disintegrates unless you spend a shit ton to create and Maintain a near perfect environment for it so eventually all the kino's eventually gets lost to oblivion
that linkrel talks further into this topic so do watch it its interesting
XwGfoP
No.382171
Kabir singh brvtally mogs both of them BTW.
ulvvHP
No.382187
>>382170
i have only watched VCDs in my childhood they were pretty low quality but cheap
equivalent to 240p resolution
i will definitely buy a blu ray player one day and watch BDs although i do torrent blu ray remux releases from trackers
>true silver halide emulsion is inherently superior when it comes to image rendering and texture
film has an organic look because of the grain you can try to emulate it digitally but i don't think you can achieve that warm glowy look of 35mm on a computer
>film doesn't age well
that's true but i think that's what makes film reel special tbh like you need to care for it as it's a real physical thing unlike digital footage which can be accessed simply by the click of a button on a computer seems very soulless tbh
also it's crazy how old analog cameras were actually higher in their digital resolution equivalent than modern day ones lol 35mm reel can have resolution equivalent to "16k" depending upon the condition of it's grain
c4MM0b
No.382218
>>382187
>equivalent to 240p resolution
I think that was 480i NTSC standard but we use PAL so it should be higher quality but anyways
>film has an organic look because of the grain you can try to emulate it digitally but i don't think you can achieve that warm glowy look of 35mm on a computer
yes thats because it closely imitates to what our eyes see and render because we dont have pixels but rather cones and rods which also produce "grain" of their own, I noth noticed this myself when I was gazing into the blue sky so no wonder it looks natural like its some magic, which it actually is
also fun fact the cinema standard for super-35 also correlates with the surface area of our retina so its the human eye equivalent of "full frame"
>also it's crazy how old analog cameras were actually higher in their digital resolution equivalent than modern day ones lol 35mm reel can have resolution equivalent to "16k" depending upon the condition of it's grain
This is something I learned as well when I started gaining interest in analog photography like I remember seeing a post here on bhach where the OP was a picture taken somewhere in the mid 1900s and anon was surprised how they "invented" (((instagram))) quality cameras kekekekek zoomies really have no clue high fidelity tech existed before they were even conceived into this world
ulvvHP
No.382222
>>382218
The japs had analog HD TV channels and home video way back in the early 90s btw
their ingenuity was on a different level
c4MM0b
No.382223
>>382222
of course the nips were always a step ahead in this regard they were the first ones to release a cd player by sony and first music cd
4IbvqU
No.382325
>>381935(OP)
i have said it before and i will say that again. animal is a chootiya movie.
i have not watched dhurandhar yet. but it shouldn't matter.
