Recent Posts
Never going on Reddit again ....
It's been a long time since I last visited Reddit, and my mental health had improved a lot > Then I spent about an 1.5hr scrolling, and I was genuinely shocked by the amount of racism directed at Indians. > It was overwhelming and now i am proll...
ndUZHi
No.449420
>>449418(OP)
You should move to usa like that other anon, you can sit in lectures by gorimems
ZyP04w
No.449421
>>449418(OP)
move to SEA and join call center support work
YF3gH9
No.449423
>>449420
99% gorimemes are stupid
4OIelY
No.449425
>>449420
American gori mem are disgusting. America is the fat rich guy of european race who nobody likes
1/mkte
No.449426
>>449423
Dont care nígga, gorimem is gorimem
4OIelY
No.449428
>>449421
Why? I can do call support here. But they won't lecture me. I personally want British mem sahebs to lecture me
4OIelY
No.449429
>>449426
True. Gori Mem are the queen's
4OIelY
No.449432
>>449423
How? Are they preachy and entitled and radiate mommy energy? Or are they needy and pathetic as jeetas?
ZyP04w
No.449433
>gorimem is gorimem
reeeeee earworm time
4OIelY
No.449434
>>449433
What's this 😭😭
ZyP04w
No.449436
>>449434
bhach culture at its finest
YF3gH9
No.449438
>>449432
entitled - yes, not much 'mommy' energy. I am not joking when I say 90% of them look the same not because of their appearance but because they all wear the same things, all have badly dyed hair in the same style, it's very easy to start disliking the vast majority fast
YF3gH9
No.449441
>>449433
kekekekekek
FB/OqT
No.449442
4OIelY
No.449443
>>449438
Well I mean yeah I do know they look like factory produce
4OIelY
No.449456
>>449438
Do u have a Gori mem frnd?
YF3gH9
No.449465
>>449442
I am not hating on them yaar, just saying the truth.
waise gorimems are still 100x better than almost all Indian girls here anyway because they don't smell, are kind in nature to others, and not short (few were almost as tall as me)
actual indians are just bitchy here tbh. i think the only races I can actually hang out with here are gooks and iranians
YF3gH9
No.449469
>>449456
No but they sit next to me in lectures
YF3gH9
No.449471
I just talk to them when the profs ask us to discuss in groups
4OIelY
No.449487
>>449469
Atleast make frens there with goris. Whts the point of being in america if ur not gonna interact with Americans. Are u the only indian? Are other Indians are autistic like u?
oiJHZ3
No.449493
>>449487
Twink anon post more pictures of you in that thread
4OIelY
No.449518
>>449493
Nooooo I have been caught 😱
YF3gH9
No.449519
>>449487
there are plenty of indians, we are the 2nd largest ethnicity of international students here behind chinese (domestic Americans obviously are more number than us). Other Indians here are all from south bombay or dalli and despite being richie richfags they still talk in fucking Hindi to each other in the classrooms. It makes me sick, like why the fuck are you here if you don't want to assimilate?
H1PAS0
No.449565
>>449418(OP)
Its funny how timmies keep spouting that bs to justify british rule. In reality, sati was voluntary self immolation. No woman was thrown into the pyre by force tho the woman who chose to sati out of grief were honoured for their love for their husband.
0VRyCD
No.449566
>>449519
>talk in fucking Hindi to each other in the classrooms. It makes me sick, like why the fuck are you here if you don't want to assimilate?
Plebbit Parr wapis jaa madarchod
Onfi2f
No.449568
>>449565
Trve, older trad indian wamen loved their hussies so much that they'd end themselves. Whatever happened to this mentality
0VRyCD
No.449569
>>449565
British used to pluck pajeetas breasts with heated crowbars kek.
ao4aQA
No.449584
>>449418(OP)
>Unironically thinks they prohibited sati
>Believes everyone just stopped at once
Some inferior Jeets do deserve racism
H1PAS0
No.449588
>>449568
Also, self immolation was just a thing that various kinds of people chose in the dharmic world ranging from widows, buddhist monks who did it as a sign of protest to kings like Jaipala of Hindu shahis who self immolated due to grief and shame after losing to ghazni.
4OIelY
No.449665
>>449519
Why english when talking amongst themselves? Oh wait ur Kannadiga. Also are the other Indians also like this?
4OIelY
No.449667
>>449565
Extremely inaccurate historically.
4OIelY
No.449670
>>449568
Indian fan fiction
H1PAS0
No.449672
>>449667
Then please give counter evidence (missionary records dont count).
4OIelY
No.449673
>>449571
Is this common in muttland?
VYujFa
No.449675
>>449673
Yes #BNWO is going on in full swing in USA
4OIelY
No.449676
>>449672
Basic human instinct to not die? No amount of husband love can erase basic biology barring a few numbers. Sati was voluntary only in the sense like anwidow would just accept going to pure cause she had no option.
4OIelY
No.449678
>>449584
Never said I agree
4OIelY
No.449679
>>449588
Muslims also did it after seeing from hindus
4DX5Cg
No.449686
>>449676
>Basic human instinct to not die
That's like justifying basic human instinct to get raped anon because we are born to reproduce. I get it if your mother was raped and you think it is a standard thing for all women to spread their legs with what British did to widows, so you feel the need to defend your existence. To think that a man will die in field to protect his wife and his daughter but she won't choose self immolation is your view of women, don't project it on entire gender.
H1PAS0
No.449695
>>449676
So basically you have no counter historical evidence.
>Basic human instinct to not die?
Yeah because no one commits suicide out of grief and its as if each and every widow was committing sati.
4OIelY
No.449700
>>449686
>That's like justifying basic human instinct to get raped anon because we are born to reproduce. I get it if your mother was raped and you think it is a standard thing for all women to spread their legs with what British did to widows, so you feel the need to defend your existence.
Irrelevant retort to provoke a reaction to derail the thread. Getting raped or raping is not a biological instinct. Historically too raping was not as common as you think as you need stable families for offspring protection , but instinct to not die is a human and biological instinct everywhere.
>To think that a man will die in field to protect his wife and his daughter but she won't choose self immolation is your view of women, don't project it on entire gender.
Here we are not talking about warriors or jauhar but sati which involved random widow jumping in fire.
4OIelY
No.449705
>>449695
Sati practiced since earliest times. Only it was not everywhere anytime.
4DX5Cg
No.449712
>>449700
>Getting raped or raping is not a biological instinct.
It is anon, which is why animals do it frequently but we as civilised beings refrain from it. That is not counting your parents.
>Historically too raping was not as common as you think as you need stable families for offspring protection , but instinct to not die is a human and biological instinct everywhere
Also untrue, as animal show tendencies to self sacrifice when a purpose is not met. Regardless using basic instinct to justify cultural norms is a poor argument.
Again, I will repeat, just because you feel that all women are as loose as your mom is, doesn't mean they are. Such degree of projection is a poor foundation for an argument.
>>449705
Yes, and it was very based mind you. Though I feel like cumskins are last people to lecture us in this with the witch burning.
4OIelY
No.449717
>>449712
>anon, which is why animals do it frequently but we as civilised beings refrain from it. That is not counting your parents.
Again a shocking comment to derail the thread. You fail badly in this anon. No animals don't do it frequently, many animals only go after a female if they show interest cause raping is in itself risky endeavour and leads to wastage of time and possibility to injury.
>Also untrue, as animal show tendencies to self sacrifice when a purpose is not met. Regardless using basic instinct to justify cultural norms is a poor argument.
Sure self sacrifice is real and a proper biological tendency. But instinct to live is higher than the opposite. Which is why, "animal gives life to save group" becomes a headline cause it's rare than say animal runs away to save himself. Same thing with humans .
>Justify cultural norms
For starters I am not justifying the norms that iis you doing it. And no basic biology absolutely matters all culture comes from there.
>Again, I will repeat, just because you feel that all women are as loose as your mom is, doesn't mean they are. Such degree of projection is a poor foundation for an argument.
So did your father's family burn your mom? Sorry my bad for your orphan situation.
>Yes, and it was very based mind you. Though I feel like cumskins are last people to lecture us in this with the witch burning.
From it was not coerced to its based. 
4OIelY
No.449730
>>449716
>Still waiting for you to show that widows were being forcefully burnt.
Read that first page. It's not coercion but manipulation absolutely which is coercion.
>He was averse to the practice of Sati; however, he expressed his admiration for "widows who wished to be cremated with their deceased husbands".[93] He was averse to abuse, and in 1582, Akbar issued a decree to prevent any use of compulsion in sati.
Akbar issued a decree to stop forceful sati , that indeed proves many cases were coerced.
>At Lahor I saw a most beautiful young widow sacrificed, who could not, I think, have been more than twelve years of age. The poor little creature appeared more dead than alive when she approached the dreadful pit: the agony of her mind cannot be described; she trembled and wept bitterly; but three or four of the Brahmens, assisted by an old woman who held her under the arm, forced the unwilling victim toward the fatal spot, seated her on the wood, tied her hands and feet, lest she should run away, and in that situation the innocent creature was burnt alive
-Bernier.
> 1812, Ram Mohan Roy began to champion the cause of banning sati practice. He was motivated by the experience of seeing his own sister-in-law being forced to die by sati.
We have many records of the same. And the fact that ppl opposed it hard itself proves sati was in many cases forced. You are not serious if you think it was always free choice
H1PAS0
No.449770
>>449730
>It's not coercion but manipulation absolutely which is coercion.
Again that wasnt my claim. My claim was that widows werent 'forcibly' burnt as everyone makes it sound. It was voluntary suicide. And i am not interested in this feminist argument of what constitutes as manipulation. Living in any society you cant escape peer pressure. Thats pack and parcel of life.
>but three or four of the Brahmens, assisted by an old woman who held her under the arm, forced the unwilling victim toward the fatal spot, seated her on the wood, tied her hands and feet, lest she should run away.
Bernier is a well known biased christian source and
seems like bernier was quick to cook up imaginary atrocity literature but didnt care to learn that women arent allowed inside cremation sites else he would have chosen an old man in his story and not an old woman LMFAO.
>akbar banned forceful sati.
Muslims destroying hindu practices(ritual suicide) that go against islamic morality as always. What constitutes as 'compulsion'? I guess that too he would have decided or he just banned what never existed.
>ram mohan roy and others.
They were like wokes of that time. Highly influenced by christian and enlightenment morality. They are also suspected to be crypto christians. They were working to ban suicides.
k9bo5J
No.449795
>>449717
>No animals don't do it frequently
Objectively false argument.
>>449717
>no basic biology absolutely matters all culture comes from there
Also a false statement, for instance the muslims marrying cousins is a cultural norms, but even in animals, they avoid inbreeding to the best of their abilities. To stick to it as a preference only shows counter evidence to your statement.
Basic biology absolutely doesn't show that the widows were themself against burning. This is not all that different from euthanasia, or even witch burning, the difference is the widow had some say on the subject. Indians probably had enough faith in their women, which is more than we can say for the timmies, when looking at all of them historically and now.
I have clearly not stated anything that can derail this thread. You are trying to devalue a very solid statement by forcibly projecting whatever your conclusion is here. As I said, it is very normal for people to defend their existence and values of it. Some example of it being
>Lowborn Dalits trying to justify how they all are equall and appropriate faith
Denying it would mean accepting they were born inferior
>Muslims justifying pedophillia
Denying it would imply their prophet was immoral
>Homosexual justifying it as natural
Defying it would devalue who they are attracted to
>Kids born of pornstar or out of wedlock how sex is just another act
Denying it will devalue them as people to mutts
>Troons defending how gender is spectrum
Denying it would make them inferior as people, and so on.
Thus, it goes without saying that, since your own women will too spread legs for random men than give their life, which would form the foundation for your belief, you too would think that is very standard behaviour for women.
However as I said, to support other anons point, despite how bhach generally despises women, a lot of them won't align with that thought process, when they know what will happen to them if they choose to stay alive.
This actually aligns with how female animals will choose great bodily harm rather than to breed with someone they don't wish to. (Not counting your mother). Thus women who prioritise their autonomy will choose to burn themself in order to make sure whatever values they have are not rotten in front of their eyes.
It is not different from a parent killing their child for committing ICM either. All parents what to see their offsprings have offspring but if you know it is counter intuitive, putting it aside to wipe out your offspring is both common in the wild and humanity.
>TLDR
You are assuming all women will just choose to whore-out rather than die because that is belief of women related to you, but that's not women as a whole.
>>449717
>From it was not coerced to its based.
You don't need to be coerced to be based. Even if it was coerced it still would be based. You are on some hope that I am making a moral statement, I am not though, it's just objectively unrealistic. However it was not coerced regardless.
k9bo5J
No.449796
>>449730
>manipulation absolutely which is coercion
Objectively false as well.
>>449730
>And the fact that ppl opposed it hard itself proves sati was in many cases forced.
False statement under assumed truth. Same argument can be used for people being against traditional marriage means women as a whole are forced into traditional marriage or have no say in the context. That's a really sad defence.
k9bo5J
No.449802
>>449770
Also this.
For instance we can draw a directly parallel between vernier, roy and modern day feminists like awkward goat. They tend to selectively nit pick the worst traits and elements that our very much outliers. Use it as a basis to draw general statement of entire group, however it is this said poor critique that will get documented over the past of time. For everyone else or is just part of life.
k9bo5J
No.449804
>>449423
>99% gorimemes are stupid
And nearly 75% of them are whores, which goes hand in hand. Statistically half of the timmies you see on internet who are Gen Z, has a mother who is ran through.
FxnBS7
No.449906
>>449802
Yeah pretty much. They selectively nitpick. For eg they never bring up the many recorded cases of sati where the family try their best to dissuade the widow from committing sati yet she goes ahead with it like the one instance in rigveda, story of emperor harsha and his mother and sister, case recorded in mysore stone and ahilya bai holkar being prevented from sati.
