Recent Posts
Never going on Reddit again ....
It's been a long time since I last visited Reddit, and my mental health had improved a lot > Then I spent about an 1.5hr scrolling, and I was genuinely shocked by the amount of racism directed at Indians. > It was overwhelming and now i am proll...
DvBdkV
No.449547
I have no homeland. How can I call this land my own homeland and this religion my own, wherein we are treated worse than cats and dogs..
~ Boddhisatva Babasaheb Bhim Rao ji Ambedkar
k8kwQa
No.449549
>>449547(OP)
I like how bhimtas are so stupid they move from one religion where they are supposedly oppressed by UC to another one founded by UC which oppresses LC even more so
nm+SRo
No.449550
>>449549
I wish all of them just migrated to Pakistan with that subhuman leader when the nation split so all of them could have been wiped out.
wW5XuD
No.449552
>>449549
Buddha was never a hindoo
k8kwQa
No.449554
>>449550
They did have a Bhimta movement in Pakistan. They even had a LC leader like Ambedkar.
When they started demanding equality however however the UC of Pakistan started just killing them and their Babasaheb fled back to India.
k8kwQa
No.449556
>>449552
Buddha was born as a UC hindu and he was cremated as a Hindu.
And he himself named his movement "Sanatana Dharma".
Guess what Hindus name their religion?
nm+SRo
No.449558
>>449554
>Pakistan started just killing them and their Babasaheb fled back to India.
Which is hilarious and what we should have done as well, and spared the good ones here and there based on words of other UC's. Literally the only nation where parasite is larger than the host itself.
nm+SRo
No.449559
>>449556
>Explaining scriptural and historical facts as if the less evolved subhuman retard could know or make a difference
kya yaar anon
wW5XuD
No.449560
>>449556
Tell me which hindoo (indian) is related to him
k8kwQa
No.449567
>>449560
Probably many Kshatriyas from North India are related to him.
There's nothing special about it either. Just like Yadavs claim to be related to Krishna.
We know that the tribe of Buddha married off many people with different Indian tribes as well.
One of those marriages led to the destruction of the tribe itself.
https://ancient-buddhist-texts.net/English-Texts/Dhamma-Verses-Comm/04-03.htm
Anyway there is no such thing as Buddhism. Buddha never claimed to be a "non Hindu". In fact the most repeated and important sentence is
"Esa Dhammo Sanantano"
which is just jungle-gook Sanskrit (Pali) for
"एष धर्म सनातन"
https://www.tipitaka.net/tipitaka/dhp/verseload.php?verse=005
Basically Buddha , if his disciples memorized his speeches/lines correctly, kept repeating that "This is Sanatana Dharma".
Which ofc Bhimtas are too stupid to understand. Buddhism is part of "Hinduism"
.However Buddhists being retarded and attacking Hindus (and more importantly Jains) is much older than the Bhimta movement and goes back to Ashoka.
wW5XuD
No.449570
>>449567
All this wordcelling but no answer
k8kwQa
No.449572
After Buddha died multiple tribes and Hindu kings tried to claim him as one of their own:
> King Ajatashatru of Magadha.
> The Licchavis of Vaishali.
> The Shakyas of Kapilavastu (Buddha’s own family).
> The Bulis of Allakappa.
> The Koliyas of Ramagrama.
> A Brahmin of Vethadipa.
> The Mallas of Pava.
Each of the eight groups took their portion back to their respective lands and built a Stupa over them. These are known as the Drona Stupas. About 250 years later, Emperor Ashoka reportedly dug up seven of these eight stupas to redistribute the relics into 84,000 smaller stupas across his empire to spread Buddhism.
Chapter 37 cremation of the Buddha onward
k8kwQa
No.449573
>>449570
Multiple tribes already claimed Buddha as their own at the time he died actually.
>>post-449572
Logically all these tribes will have descendants who are most likely to be Kshatriyas nowadays.
wW5XuD
No.449575
>>449573
And which (indian)s this tribes come under?
You have no answer hindooo, no proof that buddha was uppercuck hindoo
nm+SRo
No.449586
wW5XuD
No.449589
>>449580
Hindoo unable to prove his imaginary claims
k8kwQa
No.449593
>>449589
Sidhartha Gautama
Do you know what Gautama gotra is pyaare
That's the reason why even brahmins started claiming him (and not only Kshatriyas).
wW5XuD
No.449598
>>449593
Yeah hindoo proving ancestry through imaginary lineages
k8kwQa
No.449601
>>449598
Well it's more to make sure you know that he was UC.
He wasn't a bhangi that's for sure.
So the main Q for Bhimtas is : Why would you abandon a religion by a UC to move to another one also created by a UC? Why not create your own.
And the answer is Bhimtas are just really stupid and low IQ (and the varna-jati system appropriately placed them at the bottom).
OLqeXO
No.449605
>>449547(OP)
I propose a Brahmin homeland on the foothills of the Himalayas
wW5XuD
No.449607
>>449601
Pongas are known for faking history
onvH/o
No.449608
>>449605
I second this. I so want to settle at the shores of Kerala
mqcDyX
No.449609
>>449598
He was son of a king, so doesn't that makes him kshtariyas ??
What do u suggest he was anon ??
OLqeXO
No.449610
>>449580
mujhe is hindu jeeta ke sath sona hai
k8kwQa
No.449611
>>449607
The source of this are buddhist chronicles themselves you stupid chandala
Both the birth and the cremation of Buddha
Brahmins themselves actually didn't care much about Buddha at all.
In fact the biggest enemies of Buddhists were Jains.
wW5XuD
No.449614
>>449609
There were shudra kings too
wW5XuD
No.449615
>>449610
She is bamani dancing for dalit bvll
wW5XuD
No.449616
/vse4F
No.449618
>>449611
you have to understand bhangi chamars have no independent history or culture, arguing with them is futile, they just keep making random historical personalities their baap out of nowhere
mqcDyX
No.449619
/vse4F
No.449624
>>449616
>Shakya (Pāḷi: Sakya; Sanskrit: Śākya) was an ancient Indo-Aryan tribe of north-eastern South Asia whose existence is attested during the Iron Age
they were definitely not chamars for sure
wW5XuD
No.449626
>>449624
Many dalit groups have R1A haplogroup while potbelly UCs have indian haplogroup
mqcDyX
No.449636
>>449625
Doesn't that negates the entire argument in the first place ?? It means shudras were kings and all and weren't oppressed so no need to keep blaming UC Hindus
mqcDyX
No.449637
>>449626
Dalit Invasion Theory
/vse4F
No.449641
>>449626
Nope.
nm+SRo
No.449643
nm+SRo
No.449645
>>449637
according to periyar and phule these subbo should leave kek.
/vse4F
No.449648
Dalits quite literally have nothing to do with Buddhism or another religion in Indian subcontinent whatsoever, this whole meme started when BRA decided to appropriate Buddhism, he rejected the core principles, and established his own version, where he was the Buddha, he had to do this cuz actual Buddhists from Tibet and Srilanka humiliated him.
Buddhism took (indian) system along with it, everywhere it went - Japan, Tibet etc, all of this is recorded history.
/vse4F
No.449649
>>449645
kek
wW5XuD
No.449651
Meanwhile the pongas who are mocking dalits
/vse4F
No.449653
>>449643
kek, the whole bahujan thing has to be biggest meme of all, 80% of atrocities cases on dalits are filed against muh "shudras", these dalits literally slave on the farms owned by OBC (indian)s kek, where heir women get raped.
k8kwQa
No.449708
>>449653
It's the same with aboriginals in Australia, Blacks in the US.
Below a certain IQ threshhold, all that awaits you is just endless violence and rape no matter what religion or race you have.
wW5XuD
No.449718
PONGAS COPING :KEK:
