Recent Posts
Sarvam AI doesn't know the Indian flag
40QROB
No.480551
>>480550(OP)
Atleast majority of them do, they are very slow.
+pWnu8
No.480555
>>480551
Broatal man, it must take generations of cope for them to develop such delusion
ISmlXY
No.480556
>>480550(OP)
No they don't. Aside from modern kanglus in social media, most muslims think their ancestors were Arabs. Why be a second rate Turk who also was converted by Arabs when you can kang as first?
D7eOAC
No.480557
>>480550(OP)
Turks are the reason why Indian subcontinent is filled with katuwas
+pWnu8
No.480558
>>480556
>Why be a second rate Turk
They weren't tho, most were voluntary converts who raped arabs too
+pWnu8
No.480559
>>480557
Ikr, but what's the thought process of mujeets?
D7eOAC
No.480560
>>480556
Arabs are the weakest 'martial race' as per indian standards.
Fall of the Sindh was the only significant thing Arabs were able to do. All other invasions of them were nothing burger. Rajus defeated them many times.
+pWnu8
No.480563
>>480560
Turkics were the only race which voluntarily acceptable islam because it exactly matched their hardy steppe lifestyles
D7eOAC
No.480564
>>480559
Muzzies don't understand difference between religion and race.
Tomorrow i can convert to christianity and kang on Baldwin
+pWnu8
No.480565
D7eOAC
No.480567
>>480563
Not really, many c@stes in India accepted islam willingly. In south east asia, it was traders who popularized it. For rest of the world, it happened mostly through swords.
ISmlXY
No.480569
>>480558
>>480563
Another turk glaze thread. Anyway I am not talking about Turks being inferior I am just saying they were converted later.
>The process of Islamization of local peoples was slow during the Umayyad Caliphate period, but it became more intensive during the following Abbasid period. The Umayyads treated the local non-Muslims as second class citizens and did not encourage conversions,[155] therefore only few Soghdian commoners converted to Islam during their rule.[156][page needed] However, during the Abbasid period non-Arabs gained an equal status with conversion and as a result, Islam began spreading across Central Asia.
>Peaceful at first and then violent. Islam first came to the region through Arab traders and diplomats after the fall of the Sassanid Empire. It would not become the almost universal religion of Central Asians until the 18th century, however. Before the 14th century, the region was split between a Muslim south and a Tengrist North. The two constantly fought wars after the collapse of the Mongol Empire, which the Tengrists usually won. That changed during the reign of Timur, who defeated Ilyas Khoja, Khan of Mogulistan, and later absorbed all of the Chagatai Khanate after Ilyas’s assassination. This consolidated Islam in Western Central Asia.
ISmlXY
No.480570
>>480560
I am not talking about superiority as both Arabs and Turks have achieved nothing on their own aside from savagery. What i mean is Turks were later convert not Arabs.
40QROB
No.480571
>>480559
It comes thanks to illiteracy usually. Majority of Muslims in subcon are not well literate. This comes thanks to how many of them are indian from economically backwards classes, which brings the average down. Mix an illiterate and intelligent group with right to free speech and cheap internet and you get what you do.
See the idea that their women were raped and their men had to bow down to external figure is extreme form of humiliation. Elites didn't enjoy this so they came with idea of dissociation as a whole.
Normally it used to be the idea that all of them converted in mass voluntarily as a cope but then some of them started kanging on their lineage being ashraf and what not. Eventually that ended up being a standard norm.
D7eOAC
No.480573
>>480565
Subcontinent muslims takes Ummah way too seriiously.
40QROB
No.480574
>>480570
It's true, only real group that probably didn't get pressure into it due to survival would be Arabs who simply shifted majority of pagan and their judaist principles of desert tribes into islam, it is also why islam is so arab centric.
ISmlXY
No.480576
>>480567
Almost no one adopted islam willingly under influence of some baba. It was always coercion or manipulation or tax terrorism.
ISmlXY
No.480578
>>480574
Arabs also were forced converted. Muhammad attacked many pagan Arabs and forced them to convert, destroyed their temples, killed jews and enslaved christians to convert them. No same human would adopt this cancerous religion out of will unless they are a sadist.
40QROB
No.480580
>>480573
I experienced that too, dated a girl from bahrain, literally none of all this shit that indian muslims or other subcon muslims do. It might be just imposter syndrome, while muslims who have been this way for much longer with no other rivaling faith in vicinity has relaxed about such things. Turk is a a good examples since they place more value to Turk people than Islam, atleast those who follow attaturk do.
40QROB
No.480585
>>480578
I didn't say any of those things didn't happen, I am saying Islam turned out arab centric and they as arab tribes had more autonomy over the diary than subcon converts did who joined the faith after it was ossified already. They absolutely had no autonomy in it.
This leads to a horrible inferiority complex in the other groups. Even looking at who is the true progeny of last prophet boils down to which arab do you wish to follow. They compensate for it with radicalisation.
fMY089
No.480587
>>480550(OP)
All Muslims do have some amount of foreign ancestry (Arab, Iranic, Turkic, etc.). That's what makes them better than average Pajeet.
D7eOAC
No.480598
>>480587
> Every single muslim's ancestors were raped by foreign invader at one point
+pWnu8
No.480609
+pWnu8
No.480613
>>480598
Chamars bred out those genes long ago,
vywkP5
No.480615
+pWnu8
No.480617
>>480615
Do southie abbo converts do that really?
vywkP5
No.480619
>>480572
>Indian muslims are losers. They are seen as disgusting by other muslims because they don't assert their indian identity.
It's sort of viewed as leeching tendency. It is also because they kang at other ethnic groups. It is bound to disgust anyone.
vywkP5
No.480625
>>480617
Syrian christians don't do that from what I think, since they don't kang at all, but they think they are better than other group of Indian christians, and try to larp as white. They are not vocal about it unlike non syrian subbos, but they all do it kek.
bwGdBv
No.480640
>>480636
How to get these Results ? I want to trace my ancestry.
ISmlXY
No.480668
>>480636
I wanna check my ancestry.
S/OAeN
No.480730
>>480569
Sogdians were iranics not turkics. Sogdians inhabited transoxania before turkics displaced them. Turks were not conquered by arabs except for a few tribes here and there. Rather it were the turks who conquered persia and adopted islam.
S/OAeN
No.480736
>>480572
>can kang as christian but you can't kang as Indian.
Thats oxymoron. Kanging is done based on race and ancestry not religion.
yurmvi
No.480753
S/OAeN
No.480798
>>480576
>Almost no one adopted islam willingly under influence of some baba.
This kek. I kek every time someone tries to claim it were sufis who converted them kek. Those sufis were just like muhammad or abu bakr al baghdadi i.e. religious leader cum military commander. Pisslam was invented for nomadic pastoralist tribes and it suited their lifestyle of plundering. What you see happening with isis and taliban has been happening for centuries. Same shit except this time they get easily btfod by guns as we no longer live in age of horse archers.
ISmlXY
No.480804
>>480730
Most Turks were forced or tax converted by Arabs. Read the rest.
S/OAeN
No.480805
>>480587
Only some microcommunities like gujarati bohras or elite nawab families do. Nearly every mujeet is a pajeet hardware with arab operating system downloaded.
ISmlXY
No.480807
>>480736
That does not make any sense.
N7pNNT
No.480824
>>480550(OP)
Very soulful music. Which language is this? Also which race made this?
S/OAeN
No.480830
>>480804
No they werent. They werent even part of the arab empire except for the turkic slave soldiers that they used to sell to arabs. Turks arrive much later in the scene when arabs are gone. They conquer sogdians, adopted islam and persian culture much later. Seljuq turks conquer persia.
xqtrJ7
No.480939
>>480824
>The Altai are a Turkic speaking ethnicity inhabiting the Altai Republic of Russia. Their traditional and historical culture was based on livestock and a nomadic or semi-nomadic structure, in which horses played an important, even central part, as seen in most of the mythologies of the steppes Turkic peoples and similar cultures.
>The instrumentation consists of a topshur (also called dombra in other countries), possibly the central instrument of Altai music, as well as many of the folk Turkic traditions of the steppes, such as Kazakhstan, (although the shape of the topshur can change from country to country, even culture to culture. The specific dombra I have is a Kazakh one). The dombra is often played in a rapid manner using the index finger, in order to produce a sound reminiscent of the galloping of horses. Khoomei and related forms of singing form an essential part of the music of this region.
EE8nGa
No.480943
>>480939
Thank you based sir. Are they muslim?
vywkP5
No.480949
>>480753
Dayum, we got dayoos clapping swiss mujjie bussy before 2027. Koi artjeet jaldi se inko visualise kardo kekekek.
S/OAeN
No.480956
>>480851
Transoxiana was sogdian/iranic back then. It had little to no turkic presence. Turkics were up north.
