Recent Posts
![Video by northern.gaurs [DVa8Tk8D17O].mp4](/images/uploads/b/thumbnails/thumb-1772565494870_5819.mp4.png "Video by northern.gaurs [DVa8Tk8D17O].mp4")
cBJsWz
No.500341
>>500337(OP)
phull sapport
ryaDPP
No.500343
>>500337(OP)
And for many reasons this is only applicable to fecaloids.
U9UoN0
No.500347
>>500337(OP)
phull sapport saar
bdJtur
No.500498
>>500337(OP)
Individualism is a jewish psyop. Its perfectly ok to take pride in your blood i.e your tribe, ethnicity and nation.
jUym9H
No.500512
>>500337(OP)
Sahi bat hai. Jo kuch nahi kar pata wo jativadi ban jata hai
9ZSMdf
No.500515
That's what a jew would say
U9UoN0
No.500518
>>500515
jews kang the most on their identity, what are you talking about?
9ZSMdf
No.500523
>>500518
But Jews want you not to do it so they can subverse you into being acceptable and they can spread thier Globohomo cancer
Kaud5+
No.500524
>>500337(OP)
Humans are inherently tribal by nature. Ethnic, religious or ideological, that's just how we respond to adversity.
I'm from my state before someone from another state, Indian before a paki, a brown before a white etc.
Pride is inherently just a natural matter of self-confidence, you need to not end up like how certain wignat dickriders do
eKeai8
No.500528
>>500524
You're simply born a human. The rest is a social matter.
Furthermore, you're confusing real tribalism with ideologies. In real tribalism, you can become a clan member through adoption, a chief's decision, etc., or, conversely, be excluded even if you were born there. It's a social thing. You can become a brother through sworn brotherhood. Everything is built around a kind of internal legal systems that, for example, regulates obligations. They only apply only to a narrow circle of people from a specific clan. But race, for example, is already a new ideological thing and is absent as a category in real tribalism.
bdJtur
No.500530
>>500523
Deep down even these libbus understand how unnatural individualism is and how important ethnic pride is for individuals. They are the ones who came up with Black history month and diversity tokenism in media. Just imagine how horrible it feels to be a nlgger with no ethnic accomplishments and history to take pride in.
U9UoN0
No.500534
>>500524
I don't know about you but I want to rise out of basic human instinct and low behavior, its good if I was born in priviledge and even using that priviledge to the fullest to take you forward in life is good but kanging on it is animal tier uncivilized behavior, don't kang over things you have no power over
Kaud5+
No.500537
>>500528
That sort of tribalism with ceremony and traditions is dying and almost out. Ideology is the new basis for human grouping unless you live in a tiny community oriented town or villege.
bdJtur
No.500539
>>500528
>rest is a social matter.
BS. Kinship, family is based on blood. Its about preserving genes which is the foundational bedrock on which the very existence of biological world is based. Its evolutionary strategy.
Kaud5+
No.500542
>>500534
I want to as well, but the thing is, even if you declare yourself as an individual unlike others, it won't change the fact there will be many who will still see you as this race, this c4ste or this religion only.
TSer15
No.500543
>>500337(OP)
When a man has no (indian) or religion to be proud of, he takes pride in his gadha majdoori achievements.
eKeai8
No.500555
>>500537
Only the need for some kind of group, but it can be anything. But the concepts from clan to race are already imposed.
But we can roughly distinguish two poles in human societies.
Human-Animal
Civilized-Barbarian
City-Tribe
Individualism-Collectivism
Therefore, it has always been believed that barbarians are closer to animals precisely because of tribalism.
>>500539
your part of a group is socially and not necessarily biologically. It's a matter of different things. The institution of marriage, for example, is a purely social matter. What I mean is that in the case of animals, their social organization is a natural part of their instincts. This is not the case with humans, and all the categories you listed are the result of indoctrination, humans are not born with them.
bdJtur
No.500581
>>500555
>your part of a group is socially and not necessarily biologically.
False dichotomy. Social and biological existence both overlap. You cant separate them. Family is the basic unit of society and barring your spouse it is purely based on blood (you dont choose your parents, children, siblings, grandparents, uncles). Similarly, you dont get to choose your ethnic group, kinship group. Its based on blood.
bdJtur
No.500589
>>500555
>This is not the case with humans, and all the categories you listed are the result of indoctrination, humans are not born with them.
Sure. I wonder why people prefer biological kids over adoption, why parents die protecting their kids or choose to protect their kids over other people's kids. Surely nothing to do with selfish genes and evolutionary game.
eKeai8
No.500607
>>500581
a familia is a union of people under the supreme authority of the pater familias, as his property. This included not only children and wives, but also slaves. It was the pater who determined who belonged to the family. It is not the family that determines the father, but the father that determines the family. For example, check the etymology of the English word "husband". It's essentially a term of address for the head of the household by any member of the household, not just the wife, she's one among many
>>500589
The point was that the father and his authority define the family, not the other way around.
As for the son, traditionally, everything begins with the father's acknowledgment of a child. You can acknowledge him or not. You can adopt someone or, conversely, disown.
eKeai8
No.500610
>>500589
Don't you sense the animalistic smell behind all this? That's what I'm talking about. The instincts of self-preservation, reproduction, and dominance (competition). As in animals, fully natural. Simply present by default, without imposing anything.
