Recent Posts
How to make it a reality?
fwpK5Z
No.554438
We didn't deserve independence. India was better under the British.
TqlCA0
No.554441
/PquTw
No.554442
>>554438(OP)
It was better for the rich. Pajeets like you still lived like cockroaches
UZ8NZs
No.554443
>>554438(OP)
Bad bait. UK is a paki infested shit hole. My ex who is in London said she had to buy a cheaper android phone because whenever she used to go around texting on her iphone, some paki/bangla/Afghan shitskin would try to grab it. Mumbai is a lot safer than londonistan.
fwpK5Z
No.554446
>>554442
Pajeets like me would have gotten the opportunity to happily serve white masters instead of brown Brahmins
gXLBFv
No.554448
>>554438(OP)
yaaar ISI shills.
In one thread you defend randidom and here you shillf or goras. Kys paki bhungis
UZ8NZs
No.554449
>>554444
Ye GTB kon hai?
lB7B3B
No.554450
Saged
fwpK5Z
No.554451
what's saged?
lB7B3B
No.554452
4L9WWI
No.554454
>>According to Irfan Habib in his seminal work The Agrarian System of Mughal India (1556–1707), the land revenue (tax) demand under the Mughals up to one-half (50%) of the total produce. This was part of a highly extractive system, often supported by additional taxes, which constituted the primary surplus appropriation from the peasantry
British rule and mughul rule both are extractive made the life of farmers ,artisans peasants miserable
but why do we only demonize Brits
at least Brits build some dams and canals universities in return
9tEFWK
No.554464
>>554451
Lmao sgtow is navhizdu
RF8G72
No.554465
>>554441
We might need to sariya gtb soon
FY3dbE
No.554468
3Y6B24
No.554542
>>554443
>Brits are bad because pakis
TbGcLC
No.554629
>>554438(OP)
no it wasn't
and btw every place looks good if you reduce the amount of people who live there
if you remove all people you simply have pristine nature
