RWyy7w
No.134178
Do you think he's gonna be successful with this price tag?
uutnlH
No.134179
>>134178(OP)
only for richchads
hYxuy9
No.134180
wont even take 5% share in market. also what speed are they offering at 3k/month?
1xUo4G
No.134183
>>134178(OP)
Nope lmao.
Apart from certain industries or service sector businesses who want require low latency internet, I don't see anyone needing this.
1xUo4G
No.134185
>>134180
you have to understand the difference between latency and bandwidth.
Starlink's selling point is low latency and coverage of extremely remote areas.
1xUo4G
No.134188
>>134184
Achcha, then you will have certain remote villages in pahad or NE buying this collectively.
vm0bsd
No.134189
vm0bsd
No.134190
>>134184
nice
hYxuy9
No.134192
>>134185
how much is considered low enough? i am using ethernet cable from my jiofiber router and have 11ms idle latency and 33 something download ping
uutnlH
No.134193
>>134189
thats only 500 rs
1xUo4G
No.134194
>>134192
Nibba that 11ms latency is for you nearest server, open up international websites and then see the latency.
There will always be some latency, even in ideal conditions, it can't be zero.
!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a
DZzDkA
No.134195
>>134189
>Some bhillage entrepreneur pitches in money to buy
>3000 a month for 100 or so households
>They use LAN cables and extra routers to get it distributed
>Individual pays like 300-600 a month instead
hYxuy9
No.134197
>>134194
how do you want me to check latency for a particular site?
1xUo4G
No.134198
>>134189
JioFibre 30Mbps plan is 2400 for 6 months
hYxuy9
No.134199
>>134198
what are you trying to prove?
1xUo4G
No.134203
1xUo4G
No.134206
>>134199
That starlink connection is worthless for 95% of Indian consumers.
1wWvHk
No.134224
>>134184
This is slightly misleading, 600 to 700gbps bandwidth for 50,000 concurrent users which would reduce the average speed significantly.
Even in best case, average speed ain't gonna cross 120mbps for the most people.
Also, some anon mentioned about 'latency', nope, starlink will have higher latency but lower or around the same as your regular mobile network. We can get latency of as low as 7ms easily on optic fiber based network.
Neither price, nor speed or latency it does well. Though it's probably good for those who are travelling maybe through car, or living in remote areas.
1wWvHk
No.134226
>>134224
If you are using optic fibre i would say you can get latency below 5ms in coastal areas.
Starlink's average latency is around 20 to 60ms.
vm0bsd
No.134227
>>134226
my jiofibre download latency 71 and upload 11
1wWvHk
No.134231
>>134227
What kinda plan you are using man. How the hell you are going below 100mbps on fucking fibrenet
1wWvHk
No.134232
do speed test using default app of google.com and share latency
x7YT+J
No.134234
>>134185
This niqgger is for brutal failure
>>134185
>Starlink's selling point is low latency and coverage of extremely remote areas.
How come you people forget how dense india is? There is no place in india where you can walk for an hour and not a find a human. Literally every bhillage has got 5G network going on. Apart from wide connectivity there are jiofiber and airtel airfiber. Is not jewSA where there will be some faggots living in middle of nowhere
There are no wildlife enjoyers in india either
x7YT+J
No.134236
>>134184
This at 3000pm?
vm0bsd
No.134240
>>134231
30 mbps
hYxuy9
No.134247
>>134231
yaar FAANG SDE-2 ENGINEER DYAUSH, not everyone has a richfag baap or earning, most of us are nanhejeets waiting for our first job. i have same plan too and similar latency and ping.
hYxuy9
No.134252
>>134234
yaar anon, india is habitated pretty much everywhere except in odissa and chattisgarh and kashmir and picrel is coverage for 5g
vm0bsd
No.134264
>>134252
so australia is largely uninhabited ?
okK1yw
No.134267
>>134252
>india is habitated pretty much everywhere
Mai bhi toh wahi keh rha hu. Because it habitated everywhere there is connectivity everywhere
okK1yw
No.134270
>>134264
You didn't knew till now? Kek yaar
