Before proceeding, please read and understand the following:
1. BharatChan is a user-generated content platform. The site owners do not claim responsibility for posts made by users.
2. By accessing this website, you acknowledge that content may not be suitable for all audiences.
3. You must follow BharatChan’s community guidelines and rules. Failure to do so may result in a ban.
4. By using BharatChan users agree to the use of cookies, mostly for session related to user.
| Sitewide Rules |
|---|
| You must be 18 or older to post. |
| Sharing personal details or engaging in doxing is strictly prohibited. |
| Political discussions should be confined to /pol/. |
| Off-topic discussions, thread derailment, or spam may result in a ban and IP blacklist. |
| Pornographic content is strictly prohibited. |
| Any activity violating local laws is not allowed. |
| If you are not an Indian, you can only post in /int/. Or create and account and ask for approval to post in other boards. |
ysVV2M
No.306299
Over for all Nikita singhania.
>Financially well off spouse can't claim alimony
Remark by Delhi HC
fslbpc
No.306301
>>306299(OP)
That gobarjeeta still works at lundcentre btw
9FI78K
No.306313
>>306299(OP)
>Delhi HC
Stop chimping
I won't celebrate till this comes from SC, which I doubt will happen for the next 15 years
rEWfpx
No.306945
>>306313
Are you lawyerjeet?
Active Users in /b/: N/A
