Recent Posts
LuTmRs
No.439188
>>439097(OP)
Bhangali cuck toh hota hi hai, bjp aayi toh naarthie maa chod denge tmc mai kanglu se toh chud hi rhi h kek
jU2igv
No.439190
>>439188
I am going to start my political party
wqospk
No.439201
>>439097(OP)
What a clown
Republic Day and Non veg has no relation
Infact they should be more blood thirsty imagining what their ancestors fought for
Saar veg saar don't kill animal saaar
Do they even realise what the freedom fighters must have gone through
6oh38u
No.439209
>>439201
They are feeding boneless chicken to birds in New Delhi to keep them away from parade Road but prevent Odiyas from eating meat
Moreover this is a congress heavy seat, bjp is testing the waters there, will implement it on rest of Odisha soin
1GABIZ
No.439212
>>439209
odias are abbos, bjp is an aryan party, they just trynna civilize you negroes.
7InZec
No.439226
7InZec
No.439230
one of my biggest anger against boomers and chaddis is this their autism about vegcuckery.
>inb4 jain
i can afford vegcuck lifestyle but most of the kids who are eating one piece aloo are better off with eggs etc.
one more thing which infuriates me about vegcucks is how they don't even try to make it healthy - promote millets, that bean thing instead of fucking slopping over potatoes.
FBMZ6Y
No.439278
>>439230
Idk why people act so concerned about "the children" all the time.
If you really care about poor children in India , go sell everything you have and spend your whole life feeding them.
You will quickly realize it's pointless to do so.
Because the people having the children are just ... going to make more if you feed their children for them.
And yes, banning non veg is defining for India. If India becomes a non veg country there is no reason for India and Pakistan to be separated.
6oh38u
No.439280
>>439230
The howrah kamakhya vande bharat express has only vegeterian food and even a jain menu
Neither bengalis nor assamese are vegeterians + kamakhya has pashubali (once even had Narbali)
6oh38u
No.439281
>>439278
>And yes, banning non veg is defining for India. If India becomes a non veg country there is no reason for India and Pakistan to be separated
Accha lode
CxEJ8i
No.439282
>>439097(OP)
Disappointing
6oh38u
No.439284
>>439278
But india is a non veg country though? Only 30% indians are vegeterians
AHeL+G
No.439295
>>439230
Are you really a jain or just larping dayus? 
6oh38u
No.439297
>>439284
Non veg is scripturally allowed in hinduism for all non dwijas btw
6oh38u
No.439299
>>439295
He is a tantrik Shiva worshipper, he is trying to hide it so that anons don't get suspicious
FBMZ6Y
No.439303
>>439284
The whole point of India to exist is that it is a Hindu majority country as opposed to a Islamic one and if non veg (i.e. Hindus who want to protect animals and view non veg as impure due to animal slaughter) becomes prevalent there is no reason for Hindus to care that India exists or India be separated from Pakistan (or even Bangladesh).
In general the existance of Pakistan benefits Hindus. Imagine having 30 crores Muslims more in India living off Hindus.
Even if you disagere with veg vs non veg:
If you are smart and want India to succeed you will accept, follow and push every guide line which harrasses and makes life harder for Indian muslims.
That includes non veg bans.
India will not succeed with Indian muslims. Pakistan and Bangladesh are 100% Indian muslim. Even Maldives is a 100% Indian muslim country. Indian muslims can't govern on a large or small level.
Same is true for Indian Buddhists btw. Sri Lanka defaulted multiple times.
Also most North-Indians live mostly vegetarian lives. Occassionally eating chicken.
If you count Hindus only something like 40-60% will be pure veg in the North.
6oh38u
No.439306
>>439303
Accha
So Muslims want traditional marriage systems so we should push degeneracy amongst women? This is how you sound. If Muslims push to control female hypergamy, we should push hookup culture amongst women in india ?
North india ≠Hinduism. North India ≠India. Meat eating is integral to cultures of states like WB. If BJP wants to ban it here it will get the electoral boot.
7InZec
No.439307
>>439278
>Idk why people act so concerned about "the children" all the time.
pratty when was the last time you visited India? i visited bimaru states and in them i saw what they were feeding in primary schools.
i can post the pics right now, it's worse than people feed to their pets. and no it's not because government is not sending money or even resources - it's pure subhumanity of cockroach babus, 'teachers' and politicians who gobble up the funds.
and on top of it bjp state government banned eggs in midday meal. they are deliberately stunting the kids projecting the morals which even they don't adhere to - most recently an outed bjp leader was caught as being beef eater.
you can't defend a system where subhuman neta is eating away the money food from literal poor kids. gulag is mercy to these roaches.
>And yes, banning non veg is defining for India. If India becomes a non veg country there is no reason for India and Pakistan to be separated.
c'mon majority of the hindus are non veg eaters. unless you are practicing vaishnawa - even among them probably priests are limited.
and again let's keep all of this aside, okay go ahead have veg food but maybe provide quality equivalent? they literally provide fucking pieces of aloo. this is pure virtue signaling by cockroach boomers.
>>439280
brutal yaar.
6oh38u
No.439308
>>439306
This is literally Ressentiment morality btw. Doing everything opposite to Islam literally makes hinduism a reactionary religion to Islam btw
Muslims don't like pork so will you push Pork amongst hindus ?
Why don't North indians start eating Pork enmasse if everything has to be reactionary to Islam?
6oh38u
No.439311
>>439308
Furthermore, giving up your culture for reacting to Islam is an indirect victory to Islam
Same as north Indians adopting pork to react to Islam, same as meat eating hindu groups giving up meat to react to Islam
1GABIZ
No.439312
>>439311
what is bad in eating pork tho? its not forbidden for us.
6oh38u
No.439315
>>439312
Same as I dont want to give up meat because it is my culture just to react to Islam, similarly I don't want a vegetarian rajasthani to start eating pork JUST for reacting to Islam
It is handing an indirect victory to Islam
FBMZ6Y
No.439324
>>439306
Meat question is an attempt to subvert Hindu core values of India.
Slaughtering and eating meat is objectively bad/evil. You SHOULD feel ashamed if you do it, because it IS WRONG. Especially mass industrial slaughtering is just bad/evil.
What you are seeing is a slow but steady subversion because somebody or some powers want to "unifiy" Pakistan BD India.
Mostly behind it are Indian muslims. Pakistan/BD failing makes IM look really bad.
You will notice they push for cow slaughter indirectly (Why did they kill the smuggler!!!... Why didn't they go to the Police!!!!... What's wrong with eating beef!!!... Hindutva terrorism!!! ).
That's in the same line as push for non veg.
Goal is to really make it OK for Pakistani muslims and Bangladeshi Muslims to come and exist in India - after all whats the difference except the pass port?
There really isn't any. IM get more power the more muslims exist in India. PK/BD muslims are poorer than them and afraid of Hindus so IM can leverage that and get more power by bringing them in.
> Muslims want traditional marriage systems
There is no such thing as "degeneracy". Openness goes hand in hand with what you call "degeneracy". Accepting LGTVQ etc. are all part of progressive societies. Imho if you put a check on child abuse there won't be many LGTVQ naturally.
Also Muslims are much more "degenerate" than Hindus - higher child rape/abuse, higher inbreeding (higher birth rate defect rate), higher divorce rates, lower IQ. And yes, oppressing women is objectively bad in 2026 because it's unnecessary.
Muslims also torture/abuse animals on a religious level - letting them bleed out to death (halal slaughter) while they are in pain which is one of the most evil things to exist on the planet.
There is really nothing good about Islam. People who try to find good things in it are usually coping because they feel they are powerless against it.
Remember being a muslim is a choice. Any muslim you meet can instantly stop being one any time he wishes so.
Hindutva doesn't want to make everybody a Hindu. Hindutva wants to mainly stop India from it becoming abrahamic in nature (esp. islamic).
6oh38u
No.439334
>>439324
>Meat question is an attempt to subvert Hindu core values of India.
>Slaughtering and eating meat is objectively bad/evil. You SHOULD feel ashamed if you do it, because it IS WRONG. Especially mass industrial slaughtering is just bad/evil.
So is a formalised varna system? So is drinking milk?
Feel free to ban meat in North india, keep it away from East Indian states.
>>439324
>You will notice they push for cow slaughter indirectly (Why did they kill the smuggler!!!... Why didn't they go to the Police!!!!... What's wrong with eating beef!!!... Hindutva terrorism!!! ).
>That's in the same line as push for non veg.
>Goal is to really make it OK for Pakistani muslims and Bangladeshi Muslims to come and exist in India - after all whats the difference except the pass port?
>There really isn't any. IM get more power the more muslims exist in India. PK/BD muslims are poorer than them and afraid of Hindus so IM can leverage that and get more power by bringing them in.
False equivalence. Again, ban it in North india ,not in our states. Odisha is not North india.
You are free to do whatever you want in your states, spare us the trouble. Meat eating is part of East Indian Hindu culture and we won't change it to please you.
1GABIZ
No.439337
>>439324
dont worry, i will eat meat and kill muslims without any discrimination when time comes. i will even eat muslims. you need asurs like me on your side to win.
1GABIZ
No.439341
>>439337
my face muscles and fingers twitches whenever i go through this one street where inbreds live.
6oh38u
No.439353
On second consideration if I get a stacy high steppe fair skinned trad narthie waifu who will cook veg food for me I will be vegeterian
7InZec
No.439354
>>439353
kek
7InZec
No.439355
>>439353
how's your lookmaxxing journey going on sirs
FBMZ6Y
No.439356
>>439334
All meat eating groups in India rank lower in EVERY metric than their vegetarian counter parts.
Hindu brahmins have the highest rate of vegetarianism. Same with Jains. Exception might be Parsis.
Brahmins/Jains/Parsis are the absolute highest performers not only in India but EVERYWHERE in the world.
Those stats you see from Indian Americans are mainly pushed by vegetarian Patels (which are Banias not even Brahmins).
> varna system
> drinking milk
Sure , but drinking milk is fine if you have your own cow tho. Most families in the North have their own cow that they live with until it dies. And that they get milk from.
Varna system has no real implication on real life of Indians.
Most Indians have 0 knowledge of the Vedas. Most brahmins never even were priests.
This idea that there are higher and lower varnas is mostly made up in real life. What exists are simply racial differences because India has many different racial groups - and they stick to eachother. It doesn't matter what you say or implement, these racial differences won't go away.
>False equivalence. Again, ban it in North india ,not in our states. Odisha is not North india.
No it's not lol. Non veg is a crucial point for enemies of Hindus to subvert the Hindu cause in India. Another one is Hindu rituals Muslims (and Xtians, Jews) are extremely irritated by these rituals , because having to accept their existance symbolizes to them that they don't have the power to subjugate Hindus.
You'll often see Muslims washing themselves or praying etc. after having witnessed Hindu Rituals because in their minds it's idolatry - which is the worst thing in Islam (same is true for Xtians).
jU2igv
No.439363
>>439356
>All meat eating groups in India rank lower in EVERY metric than their vegetarian counter parts.
>Hindu brahmins have the highest rate of vegetarianism. Same with Jains. Exception might be Parsis.
>Brahmins/Jains/Parsis are the absolute highest performers not only in India but EVERYWHERE in the world.
>Those stats you see from Indian Americans are mainly pushed by vegetarian Patels (which are Banias not even Brahmins).
Ok and ? This is negligible as an argument. Jews dominate stem so will you get your son a bar mitzpah?
>Sure , but drinking milk is fine if you have your own cow tho. Most families in the North have their own cow that they live with until it dies. And that they get milk from.
I need a statistical study for that .
>>439356
>Varna system has no real implication on real life of Indians.
>Most Indians have 0 knowledge of the Vedas. Most brahmins never even were priests.
>This idea that there are higher and lower varnas is mostly made up in real life. What exists are simply racial differences because India has many different racial groups - and they stick to eachother. It doesn't matter what you say or implement, these racial differences won't go away.
Deflecting . You first started with reaction to islam, then culture , now appeal to success of Brahmins .
>No it's not lol. Non veg is a crucial point for enemies of Hindus to subvert the Hindu cause in India. Another one is Hindu rituals Muslims (and Xtians, Jews) are extremely irritated by these rituals , because having to accept their existance symbolizes to them that they don't have the power to subjugate Hindus.
>You'll often see Muslims washing themselves or praying etc. after having witnessed Hindu Rituals because in their minds it's idolatry - which is the worst thing in Islam (same is true for Xtians).
Ok and ? I am not banning hindu rituals nor am I asking north indians to eat meat, I just want my state culture to be preserved , if BJP tries otherwise it will be electorally routed
jU2igv
No.439367
>>439363
I believe there aree ways to resist islam without going berserk on regional Hindu traditions including pashubali (which requires meat eating )
But anyways praty is a baiter
jU2igv
No.439368
>>439355
Going good, started fasting to lean Maxx
FBMZ6Y
No.439371
>>439363
> deflecting
Nope. Varna doesnt exist in India. Racism exists maybe.
If everybody in India had the same race, you wouldn't argue about Varna-Jati at all.
> reaction to islam
The whole point of BJP is it is a reaction to Islamic forces in India.
India will become islamified if BJP loses. It might still become islamified even with BJP in power.
BJP does one thing mainly: it allows Hindus to more easily access positions of power.
And that should be the goal of any Hindu. If you are smart you should study hard and become a supreme court judge etc.
Muslim will still use street power as their numbers increase, so you need to prepare on that front as well.
Because there are so many Hindus, the RightWing curse that exists in Western countries doesn't really affect BJP so much (RW parties in Western countries are just comprised of the losers/outcasts of society).
> im not banning hindu rituals
That's not the point. The point is: If Hindus are in power - can they enforce their views or not.
If they can't enforce their views - they are not in power.
If they can - good.
Non veg question and especially cow slaughter/smuggling question is the main indicator of whether Hindus are winning or losing.
pcHflv
No.439372
jU2igv
No.439373
>>439371
>Nope. Varna doesnt exist in India. Racism exists maybe.
>If everybody in India had the same race, you wouldn't argue about Varna-Jati at all.
Literally lying now tf
>The whole point of BJP is it is a reaction to Islamic forces in India.
>India will become islamified if BJP loses. It might still become islamified even with BJP in power.
Holy cope lmao. BJP can react to islam without banning local hindu culture .
>>India will become islamified if BJP loses.
No it won't , it will become islamified if hindu society is defeated not by BJP. Infact that hindu society is not a monolith is what makes it harder to defeat
Associating hinduism to a party makes it easier to defeat
>BJP does one thing mainly: it allows Hindus to more easily access positions of power.
>And that should be the goal of any Hindu. If you are smart you should study hard and become a supreme court judge etc.
>Muslim will still use street power as their numbers increase, so you need to prepare on that front as well.
>Because there are so many Hindus, the RightWing curse that exists in Western countries doesn't really affect BJP so much (RW parties in Western countries are just comprised of the losers/outcasts of society).
None of this accessing power involves banning meat
You are using various points to cope , it doesn't matter because you are wrong
>That's not the point. The point is: If Hindus are in power - can they enforce their views or not.
>If they can't enforce their views - they are not in power.
>If they can - good.
>Non veg question and especially cow slaughter/smuggling question is the main indicator of whether Hindus are winning or losing.
So bengali /odiya hindus who wish to eat meat not being able to do so is loss of hinduism in these states ? Thanks for the clarification
Cow issue ≠ meat issue .
jU2igv
No.439375
pcHflv
No.439381
>>439375
Sure homo. Why dont you start sucking dicks on the metro in hopes yoy find your man again 
