Recent Posts
Same energy?
zHAx2B
No.507266
Why do i feel the same energy in both kek.
NPv5pF
No.507273
>>507266(OP)
It is and should be , pahadin for pahadi rajput
nvEGCL
No.507274
>>507266(OP)
Hindu version of trad snowbunny getting blacked
UNtdzi
No.507560
>>507274
Seems like her gay best friend.
UlQOni
No.507566
>>507560
gay best friend Raju from Bihar
6xdM3K
No.507572
>>507273
pahadis are not rajput tf
UNtdzi
No.507603
>>507572
They do have rajputs like dogra, katoch, ranas, negis etc. Kangana ranaut is herself a rajput. Not all rajputs are from rajasthan. Thakurs/lords existed in other states as well.
6xdM3K
No.507617
>>507603
I was under the impression dogras live in J&K, pathankot etc.
>katoch
dont these guys live in Kangra? is that considered pahad
>Ranas, negis
strange, I know a guy who is Brahmin from HP who vehemently denies there being any Rajputs in HP/UK. Apparently there are a few who used to be independent chieftains but the vast majority of people with Thakur surnames are tribes who adopted it. How true is this?
UNtdzi
No.507668
>>507617
>Kangra is that considered pahad?
Yes it is. It is part of HP. Kings of those regions were referred to as 'pahadi rajas' in sikh historical texts. Tho it is context dependent and relative some people use pahadi for only higher hills.
>Apparently there are a few who used to be independent chieftains but the vast majority of people with Thakur surnames are tribes who adopted it How true is this?
Thats likely true. Many were native thakurs, ranas and rajas. Pahadi titles like 'ranas' 'thakur' 'chettri' 'rawat' etc. are native and very ancient. Those are sanskrit titles. They likely didnt address themselves with the specific term 'rajput' originally like they do today. That may have been a recent cultural phenomenon but then again the process of 'rajputisation' itself applies to everyone. Pretty much all rajputs outside of og rajputana likely adopted the title much later and were only known as thakurs earlier.
