Recent Posts
/Dawood ibrahim discussion thread/
8eRdDy
No.534541
>>534539(OP)
Gobars can&x27;t think beyond sex and make everything about sex Even bhakbhangis get it now
Gobars will fetishize Krishna but men will respect goddess as Their mothers Not confusing at all
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
D2VNGc
No.534550
AN3T4S
No.534555
>>534550
Porn did severe damage to brain of these zoom zoom, jew psyop btw
8n6VB7
No.534556
>>534539(OP)
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
bQ6njE
No.534562
>>534550
Back to plebbit chamaar, portraying krishna as some degenerate niggér is a gobarnd plebbit propaganda. It gives feminishits a high ground to promote randipana and at the same time show him in a bad light 'womanizer'
TzAxuI
No.534567
>>534562
Care to elaborate how is it degenerate? I am not familiar on the book
TzAxuI
No.534569
D2VNGc
No.534577
>>534562
>hurr durr sex bad plebbotor sex bad waaahh
ro lo unkill
sex is a biological process
>Portraying Krishna as degen
I just posted a random cover page of kama sutra
are you a retard?
D2VNGc
No.534582
>>534577
some publisher just used an image of radha Krishna statue as cover art
D2VNGc
No.534584
>>534569
iirc kama sutra doesn't permit it
between lovers is fine though adultery is not
especially for women
TzAxuI
No.534586
>>534584
I don't understand the complaining then. I feel like a lot of anons have internalised abrahamic value that inherently treats sexual relations, even if with your own marital partner as something a bit bad. This is wierd because in many abrahamic society, this led to putting foids on a pedestal where men will have sex with even a set of little boys, since it is technically not as bad as "defiling a woman". I am actually failing to read on what is exactly bad about the book, or what made him call lord Krishna a nigger exactly.
D2VNGc
No.534595
>>534586
Abrahmic values either makes you put women on a pedestal or makes them nothing more than baby making machines
both extremes are bad and dont see them as humans
foids must be treated as equals (some exceptions) in both good and bad
>what made him call lord Krishna a nigger exactly
his unclefied coombrain is so conflicted b/w his porn addiction and psyop'd brain that seeing kama sutra featuring RadhaKrishna (a sign of eternal love) made him chimp out
now I will proceed to post Radha Krishna paintings just to make this muzzie seethe
TzAxuI
No.534608
>>534595
I think it is more about the fact that since sex is instantly associated with pornography, I mean it is degenerated now since it is not as much of a private activity as it once was between people in a closed and limited social value, but more like a public show which is entry point into degeneracy.
I believe this is why concept of sex itself seems disgusting to them, as merging abrahamic value demonizes sexual activities of almost all forms. I noticed a lot of Jeets have madona whore ptsd syndrome too. Where they either respect a girl to the point they can't see her sexually, or they will mentally degrade her to a degree of whore in the order to be sexually attracted to her.
Mentally feeble people are more likely to get both, affected by this, as they demonize sex but also consume pornography at the same time, and compensate for their failings by attacking what has always existed. It could be a muzzie but it could also just be a hindu, or bhakt bhangi like OP presented. People have extremely poor understanding of their faith, thanks to majority of societal morals and norms circulating arround abrahamic faith.
I guess they fear we will hard rebound away from what is civil society, if we move away from it but I don't think Hinduism is exact polar opposite of abrahamic faiths. I think it's just somewhere in a more reasonable spot in middle that is far more functional. Same way many smriti has really hard punishment for cheating women, I guess a book that defines and describes sexual relations of two lovers, specially if married as only a means to balance that.
D2VNGc
No.534623
>>534608
a lot of Hinduism is the collective knowledge of different scholars (rishis)
which causes hinduism to be cnflicting sometimes when we consider later texts (like manusmriti)
The problem is we stopped adding more knowledge to our religion and started blind faith like those who follow abrahmics do
>Cuz point of abrahmic faith is literally mass manipulation
which is why mordern Hinduism either looks too ahead of it's time (Rishis and mathemeticians whose knowledge is applicable even now)
or looks straight up disgusting (whatever the fuck happens on Holi and Diwali nowadays)
Fz2W6f
No.534628
>>534586
Wait!! i thought the blue color was actually a representation of darker shade of skin colour, is he not a dark skinned indian?? Krishna??
I was thinking of creating a entire thread on this theory
that maybe ram was a bastard child and wanted to usurp the throne, and since he was dark skinned and remaining all others were light skinned and since he created a entire story around it. it was maybe ancient psyop to make him look good at that time public (u know a paid propaganda ) ???
Am i wrong ?? If this is wrong!!! my whole theory would be down the drain
Also I need a baman to clarify my doubts I asked chatgpt but he is just confirming my bias
to further refine it I need someone who is atleast knowledgeable
Also would like ur thoughts on this theory ?? Godd enough for a thread on /rta/
Theory so wild even captcha was :tf
