Recent Posts
Thread to discuss the state of the economy
jpleqi
No.397
We are so back
hDb60X
No.399
>>397(OP)
bhai sirf inflation pe dhyan do. sarkar taxes aur exemption se sab baraabar kar deti hai. Jab tak cheezein affordable hain tab tak sab sahi hai. Macronoeconomics bohot unpredictable hai abhi kyunki world mein 2 jagah wars chal rahi hain.
Apne nutrition aur education pe dhyaan do bas, headline inflation kaafi hai iss par dhyaan dene ke liye.
jpleqi
No.400
>>398
Stay in /b/ with the rest of the cucks, bhosdanigg3r.
jpleqi
No.401
>>399
Do you actually have an argument other than muh vibes? Inflation is down so much that GST was revamped to keep consumption in line.
hDb60X
No.402
>>401
agar inflation itna down hai toh fir log ration card se khaana kyu le rahe hain ?
hDb60X
No.403
>>402
bhachcels hafte mein do baar meat bhi afford nahi kar sakte. Inflation kahaan se down ho gya ?
2Pvle1
No.404
>>397(OP)
It was somewhat expected. PMI has been all time high since past 3 months and inflation has been low
Rainfall was ample this year so corp yield has been good this will further boost rural demand.
jpleqi
No.405
kHVPZO
No.406
>>397(OP)
How come inflation is so low and why people are doing rr over low demand.
kHVPZO
No.407
Wasn't expected real gdp growth rate around 6.8% this is really good
QxQZt6
No.409
>>397(OP)
This means nothing on the ground level
h/RAyM
No.411
>>410
> Q1 FY26 GDP growth 7.8% (highest since Q4 FY24)
> CNBC-TV18 poll expected 6.8%, actual 7.8%
> YoY GDP growth 6.5% → 7.8%
> QoQ GDP growth 7.4% → 7.8%
> GVA growth 6.5% → 7.6% (YoY)
> GVA growth 6.8% → 7.6% (QoQ)
> Nominal GDP growth expected 8.2%, actual 8.8%
> Nominal GDP 9.7% (YoY) → 8.8%
38S1oj
No.414
>>402
Are you….. retarded? What kind of argumentation is that?
jpleqi
No.416
>>409
>R/reddit tier NPC comments.
Absolute state of bhch in 2025.
>>406
Low demand means low consumption. this could be for a variety of reasons from high saving as people expect hard times ahead or simply not enough money to spend. It's horrible because it plays a bad role in the buisness cycle with companies not making enough profit letting people go this creating more low consumption.
>>410
What's happening in minning sector? I thought goverment opening various resources upto private sectors would be a boom.
>Electricity
Grim. I have heard of it, but didn't realise it was that bad.
jpleqi
No.417
>>416
*R/india
ADnn5F
No.418
ADnn5F
No.419
>>403
stupid pajeet, your bhachcel is a bottomfeeder, that's why.
QxQZt6
No.420
jpleqi
No.421
>>420
What am I supposed to disprove? Your vibes?
QxQZt6
No.422
>>421
>The budget line/demand curve remains the same if you increase the prices and incomes with the same proportion.
>Real gdp = (Nominal Gdp/ deflator) × 100
Let's see how you disprove my vibes (apparantly standard axioms of economics)
38S1oj
No.423
>>422
You argument was ‘this means nothing on the ground level’, please understand
QxQZt6
No.424
>>423
That's how you interpret those, however I doubt the capability of an avg bhachiya to do so.
jpleqi
No.425
>>422
What is your point, that inflation numbers are cooked? Because the nominal GDP at 8.8%. 7.8% is the real GDP number.
I do agree that the current CPI needs reform to better gauge out the rate but saying no change on ground is absolutely bullshit.
>>424
What are you a hormonal woman? I can't read your mind retard.
ADnn5F
No.426
>>425
numbers arent real when librandus dont like it.
jpleqi
No.427
>>426
Nah, tbh the cpi index does need reform. We indians have had lifestyle upgrade in the past decade. We are living better than when we used to spend all our money on mostly the bare essentials. The cpi isn't doing a better job at racking new consumption pattern.
He is 100% bullshiting if he thinks inflation is that crazy high. Or he is malayali, where it probably is that high.
h/RAyM
No.428
>>427
What's the reason for such drastic change in mining sector and electricity growth?
+pReZg
No.429
>>427
>>425
>>427
>We are living better than when we used to spend all our money on mostly the bare essentials.
You're a retard if you think that this is a recent phenomenon. People have been improving their lifestyles ever since. Lifestyle in 80s seemed better than 70s, for the 70s it was better than 60s and goes on. However funnily enough most people are still middle or lower middle class even though the lifestyle is "visibly" improving.
This is the improvement mirage, some people might call it matrix in the fancy terms. It roots from the narrowed conception of inflation. Contrary to the popular belief, inflation is not just the rise of prices. The goods which seem luxury to you and not necessary like smartphones, cars , etc are not actually luxury. In the wide sense inflation has also made it a necessity. Think for yourself, without laptops or computer how long could macro or micro economics survive? It will simply push you below and below the living standard. Thus essentially these are the necessary prices you pay, not the luxury like you thought like it was the case 20 yrs ago. Read about shrinkflation too if you really want to understand what's going on
>cpi
Take into account not only cpi but the real estate which mask the nominal gdp. The rich businessmen and large scale asset holders rigged tf Outta them. This is of no productivity. A bihari majdoor or a dharavi dweller or a bimaru dehati still lives the same life
+pReZg
No.430
>>428
Baniya
rIdAfN
No.431
>>429
None of this is relevant to the CPI's current limitation. Indian household spending as a percentage on food didn't fall below 50% only recently.
>real estate
everyone knows the price is artificially propped up. This is true here and just about everywhere in the world. Doesn't mean anything about inflation being some crazy high number or places like the Anglosphere and China would be in even more dire straits.
rIdAfN
No.432
>>428
No idea. I don't know about those sectors. I just have been reading news about electricity growth number being grim as an indicator of a decline in consumption.
pl0jE0
No.433
>>402
>If anon likes to spam messages so much
>Why is rahul gandhi a faggot? Bolo Bolo
Koi sense hai is baat ki? Course not lmao, what kind of argument was that.
Ibjo/w
No.434
>>431
>None of this is relevant to the CPI's current limitation. Indian household spending as a percentage on food didn't fall below 50% only recently.
Yaar pajeet, that's literally my whole point. Things that seem luxury to you are a necessity now. It's not just the time when basic food is the necessity. And the curve of necessity has been sharped even more because they now come in bundles. You can't live without those seemingly luxury necessities because you will even lose the income for food needs
Ibjo/w
No.436
I am not replying unless you counter all my points validly. I am not here to give long ass purports for low iq superficial faggot
o33XyG
No.437
Ibjo/w
No.438
>>437
>Please gib data to prove that laptops and phones have become necessary to earn a living
Yaar pajeet, don't even put so much vibrator in your arse at least
rIdAfN
No.439
>>438
And it's already included in the CPI under miscellaneous. It's weightage, along with other such goods and services, requiring change is literally what I have been saying so far.
But you seem to think that there was 0% change in growth because the index was off by about 7.8% cuz apparently laptops and phones are just that high. Show me the data for that or fuck off.
