Recent Posts
D/IpVP
No.2504
>>2502(OP)
In my personal opinion, what makes it true or false is based on two factors alone. And every thing else can be derived from those two facts.
>do we comply to religion
Vs
>Does religion comply to us
Hinduism is real to me because we abide by the harsh scriptures that were written for us. Dwija are not allowed to leave certain regions. We can not eat certain stuff. We can not do certain stuff. Islam is real to be because it actually does the same, and I say that even if I don't like (auto-excised)s.
As far as religion goes, (auto-excised)s have managed to keep their religion unbastardized for longest. They brutally slaughter anyone who disrespects it, this reaching a point where one truly is not sure if man made that faith or faith made their men. Reaching a time period of existing that long is also a factor, but that's a seperate thread.
Christianity falls in middle, because new bible is just censored stuff that got rid of all apocryphal stuff for most part. Christians are they exist are pussies, or weak willed men who can not exist without faith and thus Christianity will die.
Not because they all fail at converting others, or because of rice bags. They will die because they don't follow their own faith correctly. Chastity till marriage, banning homosexuality, acting as the opposite gender, Christianity has become just a label unlike Hinduism, Islam or Sikhi. It is simply too close to proving itself a fake faith.
A true false religion would be Neo Buddhism. In the sense that Bhimtas follow. Not only do they all worship a dead mahar, who are infact worse than (edi), they also proceed to disrespect a religion, while they worship the deity of the said religion.
Their faith conveniently was based on needs and whimsical will. The reason it even got a massive following, because it happened to take the name of a pretty existing faith, which was buddhism.
While Bhimtas clearly are subhuman and thus they all are retarded, many of them went ahead and followed Vajrayana sects, which also has all the Hindu deities despite disrespecting the same deities. Perhaps the fact that gods do not punish them for such level of subhuman behaviour itself means God either doesn't care, or God doesn't exist?
In that sense, if Neo Buddhism, or simply let's call it (auto-excised)ism was not allowed to bastardise a faith, the same way Jain's and Sikhs prevented it from happening to their faith. (auto-excised)ism would've been a cult through and through, since it would have had no scriptures that it fails to abide by.
Any faith that confirms to your societal needs, rather than challenging you to go against them to abide by its principal is inherently false, and that has been source for nearly all cults in west as well as east. Thus Bhimrao Rao Achoota and all his followers are standard book definition of a false religion and cultists.
