Recent Posts
Indian mudsharks
nDapZ6
No.4144
What are the Indian equivalent of mudsharks? Girls/women who dates or marries muslim/Christian men?
xW61mU
No.4146
>>4144(OP)
I don’t think Indians have an equivalent of mud sharks for the following reasons:
a)The large population of Indians, an Indian woman marrying out doesn’t threaten the existence of the Indian race.
b)The fact that Indian genetics are dominant, not recessive. I.e a half-Indian is considered Indian in the eyes of non Indians.
Believe me, the seethe you have at such women is less than 1% of the seethe white nationalists have at a white mud sharks. Infact a couple whites have had mental breakdowns when subjected to IMWF spams on 4chan. (indian) related is different tho.
vdIMjs
No.4151
Oldest form would be jati traitors
Theres a famous story of how the whole jati of Buddha supposedly got eradicated due to forcing/tricking a king to marry somebody from a different jati.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi%E1%B8%8D%C5%AB%E1%B8%8Dabha
3C4ePq
No.4153
>>4144(OP)
>What are the Indian equivalent of mudsharks?
Jati Traitors. Not Jati traitors itself as much as the Varna traitors. I still think marrying with the same Varna is technically fine.
>>4151
>Theres a famous story of how the whole jati of Buddha supposedly got eradicated due to forcing/tricking a king to marry somebody from a different jati.
Holy fucking kino.
3C4ePq
No.4154
>claimed that Viḍūḍabha's invasion was in retaliation for having given in marriage to his father the slave girl who became Viḍūḍabha's mother,
This shit is straight up insane lmao. Imagine having to wipe out and entire lineage because someone wanted his DC daughter to have UC babies. Absolutely insane lmao.
vdIMjs
No.4155
>>4154
It's most likely made up tho. In history better looking people esp. the women never got eradicated, even the men were either used as slaves or as bulls.
Most of Buddhist literature is just a anti-hindu LARP that was made up many centuries after the actual Buddha had died (and Buddha himself never formalized or taught anything)
3C4ePq
No.4175
>>4155
>even the men were either used as slaves or as bulls.
>bulls
They would have the beautiful men to breed a bunch of cutie slaves?
HHu4cn
No.5143
>>4146
Your second point isn&x27;t true lol Indian genes aren&x27;t particularly "dominant"
If an Indian has a kid with a chink or a black then the kid ends up looking more chink&x2F;black than Indian
With whites it&x27;s a toss up U
