Recent Posts
![Ieqg7xM[1].png](/images/uploads/b/thumbnails/thumb-1760124329108_8940.png)
Now that the dust has settled,
H6KubE
No.286219
would India have been a better place to live if we stayed with the brits, considering how they're all about libranduism and moralfaggotry nowadays.
5JC3x5
No.286241
>>286219(OP)
Have you seen the britoid workings and gobarmint overreach? It would be a terrible nanny state
H6KubE
No.286245
>>286241
But the Japanese developed under American occupation, and since Britain today is an American puppet that would make us influenced by them aswell, so maybe we'd be in a better state. They might've further liberalised the economy aswell.
5JC3x5
No.286250
>>286245
you've only made a case for american occupation. Britain is an american ally at most. Its structures and forms are much dissimilar to the states'. If we were injected with american cash(marshall plan) + american constitution(like japan), we would've been developed by now.
9LKqP8
No.286252
>>286219(OP)
The very fabric of India is a my tribe vs his tribe system. And this keeps indians in perpetual stagnation. Staying with the british and hence developing, implies that this fabric is no more. You will just become like thailand, a tourist trap cheap third world vacation spot.
amS74t
No.286256
>>286252
look at this pretentious retard thinking india is same as a tiny bug island with race that comparing it to a nation state with nuclear arms and hypersonic missiles and space missions. friendly, no country at our per capita has performed this well, most of our urban local infra problems will be solved automatically when our gdp reaches 10 trillion and keep growing.
Uq8S+a
No.286303
H6KubE
No.286310
>>286303
Not really, GDP per capita is like putting someone's head in a freezer and feet in the oven then claiming that his overall body temperature is safe.
H6KubE
No.286314
>>286303
Overall GDP is a good measure, a better one is quality of life and just asking the people how they like living here.
!024Jj6WZIDQIo9s
cLd3aS
No.286322
>>286219(OP)
you wouldn't be able to afford salt
aZER9Q
No.286346
>>286314
>quality of life
Don't worry, both NCR, Mumbai and most other gangetic belt urban agglomerations have piss poor quality of life. Southern and NE India are much better in this regard
5JC3x5
No.286361
>>286346
Mumbai metropolitan has amongst the best qol in lundia what’re you on about? And y’know this is inspite of the commute and monsoon.
EwZbkb
No.286366
EwZbkb
No.286368
>>286361
the only big cities that have good to moderate quality of life are Hyderabad>pune>bangalore
5JC3x5
No.286408
cE0IsO
No.286439
>>286219(OP)
>would India have been a better place to live if we stayed with the brits
Yes. How can you even think other wise?
EwZbkb
No.286441
pCwXnv
No.286460
>>286441
Aqi is only a 2-3 month problem in Delhi though...
cE0IsO
No.286470
>>286453
>What's worse is that you're completely wrong.
What kind of cope you are even carrying for such opinion. Kek. Gotta be some super saiyan level cope
5JC3x5
No.286475
>>286470
I've already stated that british policies(and systems) are not something that you should replicate. Other than this, no country can effectively rule a populace of a billion from such a far away place and still bring it prosperity. All colonial institutions have henceforth been extractive. They exist to enrich the colonial entity not the colonised. These extractive institutions would only continue. If you wish to keep doing 'saar yes saar' you are welcome to kill yourself.
nutGhm
No.286476
>>286453
only navi mumbai is good
amS74t
No.286483
>>286475
sepoy chutiyas think britishers built railway and industries in lundian subcon because they wanted to help poorjeets who couldnt do it themselves but in reality it was all for what benefited them, reminder they ruined all textile industry we had, just so that britian can win.
cvspj+
No.286486
>>286219(OP)
We needed an authoritarian state like the CCP where the state would forcibly sterilized dysgenic dehatis.
