Recent Posts
I see future first Lady
txswCe
No.324404
Explain the caste system to me
Just the basics like who is jaat, what is chamar etc
FsU03Y
No.324406
>>324404(OP)
caste?
m//fh1
No.324410
>>324404(OP)
Brahmin are highest, then Kshatriya, then vaishya, then shudra
txswCe
No.324411
>>324406
Yadav
txswCe
No.324412
>>324407
Yaar I'm herndu
m//fh1
No.324415
>>324413
jaat, yadav and chamar come under shudra varna
qegek4
No.324420
>>324404(OP)
american 
detected. fuck off we're full.
LeJk7g
No.324424
lnKexS
No.324425
jNwLQC
No.324473
Agl+w0
No.324482
jNwLQC
No.324490
>>324482
not only punjab pajeet haryana pr bhi jha pehle gaur brahmins/tyagi ka rule tha vha se bhi bhaga diya
Agl+w0
No.324494
>>324490
proof? sounds like some jatt fantasy
pAtV83
No.324497
>>324415
Jaat is an ethnic group, not a caste. Similar to how pasthuns are pasthuns, jaats are jaats, not shudra not Kshatriya, and I personally don't even think of myself as hindu. We never had any temples in our villages in past, this heendu larp is much of a modern phenomenon.
gW1yGD
No.324503
>>324497
Jats arent an ethnicity. Being an ethnicity requires having a common language. At best you can call them a community or tribe within haryanvi ethnicity.
jNwLQC
No.324505
>>324494
>proof? sounds like some jatt fantasy
Beta ye jankari baccha bacha janta h proof kya du tujhe
There is also no proof of that bcchu singh killed lumbedkar lekin ye har local ko pta h
jNwLQC
No.324508
>>324504
Char sikke aur ek daru pilwake likhwayi gayi mangadhat kahaniya
Agl+w0
No.324511
>>324505
Apne aap se kripya facts na nikale, Haryana mei baaki states jitni hi brahman population hai. Agar teri baat me 1% bhi sach hota to aisa nahi hota, par tujhe sirf nafrat phailani hai
Agl+w0
No.324516
>>324504
Sikhism me Brahmins ka bhi contribution raha ha, par ye Sikhism ko puri tarah hijack karna chah rha hai
uaKOeP
No.324518
>>324516
That reel is made by a sikh only,
Agl+w0
No.324521
>>324518
I think so, maybe he has a bias.
jNwLQC
No.324524
>>324513
Hahahah
uaKOeP
No.324526
>>324521
All his facts are wrong, the way he uses jatt only, hatred towards brahmin, muh punjab and sheit
Also we wuzz true aryans but have no religion
Who cares tho? They are circlejerking
gW1yGD
No.324531
>>324504
Jats do act kinda like average agrarian shudra community characterised by egoism, unsophisticated behaviour, aggression. Their kanging attempts are typical of dominant shudra midcastes' attempts at creating a new more prestigeous identity for their communities which seems sad. One should be proud of his ancestors imo even if they were farmers. Just because you no longer engage in that occupation doesnt mean you need to be insecure about past. My forefathers were likely merchants as patrilinealy i am from a mercantile community. My granddad and dad have been army officers tho. Doesnt mean much that my ancestors were once just sedentary seths.
Agl+w0
No.324532
>>324526
Its true that jatts did act as an ethnicity of their own but he then goes on to make ridiculous claims about brahmins. Well you are right, it's just kanging material.
Agl+w0
No.324535
but their cohesion is commendable
pAtV83
No.324547
>>324513
Damn ab toh kisi randput ko railway track pe push karna padega, compensation for the crimes of past ig. Thanks for enlightening me anan
pAtV83
No.324565
>>324554
Imagine the smell.
He ain't coming to save you from my rage lil bro, need to find a randput to commit some war crimes on, where do I find them?
d7XJBn
No.324571
>>324513
Rajputs lost a lot of land in bhu daan, thakurs owned over 50% land pre-independence in UP
uaKOeP
No.324578
>>324571
1950s and 1960s were the most brutal decades for all dwijas, the deeds done by our ancestors in the name of goodwill and dindu unity led us here
wFJarS
No.324588
>>324571
Gandu kheti bhi karni hoti h khali ret k medan gherne se kuch nhi hota
uaKOeP
No.324596
>>324591
Jaats love sucking sikh cocks, these people are working as footsoldiers for them 
uaKOeP
No.324597
>>324581
His clan desperately tries to claim descent from rajputs
d7XJBn
No.324598
>>324591
Gand me dal le ekta, ranghad bhi inse behtar he
uaKOeP
No.324601
> Members of the Phulkian dynasty claimed descent from Hem, a younger son of Rawal Jaisal Singh, the founder and first ruler of the Kingdom of Jaisalmer (r. 1156–1168),[11][12] who migrated to the present-day Malwa region in Punjab.[13][14] The dynasty further traces its lineage to Rao Bhati, a 3rd-century Hindu monarch.
> Descendants of Rao Bhati, including members of the former and historical Phulkian dynasty, claimed to be direct descendants of Yadu, a mythological Hindu monarch from whom Bhati claimed descent.[7][8][9] Yadu was the founder of the mythological Yadu dynasty, a branch of the legendary Lunar dynasty (IAST: Candravaṃśa), according to Hindu mythology.
We wuzz beat the fuck outta brahmins and hindus but at the same time our king claims descent from hindu kings and even mythological hindu lineages
pAtV83
No.324615
>>324591
Nah fuck randputs and Muslims, Everyone else is fine with me, Randput are way too arrogant and needs to be put in their place, most of them look like Dalits but act like kangs. Not talking about Pahadi Rajputs, they are my frens, only the Gangetic and Randasthani Randputs
uaKOeP
No.324618
uaKOeP
No.324623
>>324615
>most of them look like Dalits
They are all larpers
>act like kangs
Rajputs were kings in the past and still own the most amount land
d7XJBn
No.324632
>>324615
Jyan teri jansankhya kam ha, to dosti kar lyo, ar jhan jansankhya jiyada ha, jhagda le lya, badhiya ha 
pAtV83
No.324637
>>324598
>ranghad bhi inse behtar he
The muzzie dick is a foot deep the randput throat, who would have guessed
uaKOeP
No.324642
>>324637
Ranghars traced their lineage to hindu rajputs, they always allied with hindu rajputs no matter what, even helped rana sangha fought against delhi sultanate
IU5W2c
No.324644
>>324598
Bhulio mt kese sariya Kara tha rangad ke
uaKOeP
No.324648
>>324644
Kek, if rajputs didn't fall for the dindu unity the conditions of Rajasthan/Haryana would be different
Z/YGK/
No.324653
Z/YGK/
No.324660
>>324648
>if rajputs didn't fall for the dindu unity the conditions of Rajasthan/Haryana would be different
Yes. They will be highkey fucked by vallabhai and reduced to even less than they are
gW1yGD
No.324662
>>324653
There is no such thing as dalit, scripturally. What we have are different classes within shudra with wealthy farmers, craftsmen at top and antyajas (untouchables i.e. washermen, alcohol brewers, forest tribes, chamars, bhangis) at the bottom. You soon learn nuance when you start studying these things in depth.
l3Ef3S
No.324666
>>324623
>rajputs were kings in the past and still own the most amount land
Per capita ki bat kar pajeet
gW1yGD
No.324670
>>324615
Most rajputs who argue online with other shudra communities like jats, gujjars etc. are far from the aristocratic rajput ideal we see in popular culture. Even a zamindar of small estate could be a rajput back in the day and some were farmers themselves. They are no different from the people they argue with in terms of temperament, intellect and sophistication. You can easily make it out through the way they all argue and act with each other. They are just glorified and slightly elevated shudras (not talking about aristocratic rajputs ofc).
pAtV83
No.324671
>>324667
Ranghad ka toh sariya hi hua tha Haryana me
>The Ranghar community in Haryana experienced significant violence and displacement during the 1947 Partition of India, which resulted in many deaths and forced migration. As Muslim Rajputs, they were one of the most prominent Muslim groups in pre-partition Haryana
uaKOeP
No.324673
>>324671
Shall i share the video where jhaanyanvi dindu buddha shit his pants after listening the name of ranghars
l3Ef3S
No.324676
>>324673
To usse kya hoga pajeet ? Sale chutiya bhangi kitne sal ka h tu 😂😂
Z/YGK/
No.324677
>>324662
>There is no such thing as dalit, scripturally
I know. But nobody cares about scriptural identity after dwijas. Even vaishyas are very controversial. I was asking socially, dalit groups of today aren't considered varnic.
