Recent Posts
nIrJ0i
No.324823
ssiJrf
No.324830
>>324816(OP)
Sati never existed. It was forged by britishers to get more accepted for their nig noggery in india
TbWYsV
No.324835
>>324816(OP)
Dobara a gya coolie
Okay, I don’t understand this the British also used to burn women who could solve simple math problems.
Any woman could be accused of being a witch and had to face a “trial by God,” such as putting her hand on a flame or walking on burning coal.
If she got burned which happened every time she would be declared a witch. They burned more women than any Hindu ever did.
The British themselves reported only about 500 cases of sati annually in a population of millions, which makes it even rarer and more isolated. Not every Hindu practiced sati.
chex9s
No.324848
>>324835
Your caste?
2GxjTG
No.324850
>>324848
zutt, fucked your prophet just yesterday
+n0XPF
No.324852
>>324816(OP)
99% sati was voluntary that only just proves chastity of Indian women evident even today with lowest divorce rate. While british women slept with viking invaders for better genes.
/P/KId
No.324854
>>324823
>t. incel poojeet shitskin that would never feel pussy and die alone masturbating in his dark dirty room praying that his parents arrange him a wife
nIrJ0i
No.324857
>>324854
>Faggot projecting his insecurities on others
/3Gz5W
No.324859
Explains why pajeetas love white cock. They see them as superior godly conquerers that ruled over their land and men, liberating them from those savage men
nIrJ0i
No.324861
>>324859
Vidrel are latinas
x0udxl
No.324880
>>324852
>women evident even today with lowest divorce rate
74lcRr
No.324893
>>324816(OP)
Not a single verifiable instance of forced sati. It was voluntary self immolation which was very common in dharmic world. Buddhist monks, sadhus and even kings (jaypala immolated himself voluntarily) engaged in it all the time.
e3l6Yq
No.325062
>>324816(OP)
n8XOC6
No.325070
>>325062
kek I remember her
TbWYsV
No.325073
n8XOC6
No.325074
>>324861
no. pajeetas
nIrJ0i
No.325078
>>325074
Proof?
UQZwon
No.325095
>>324859
Pajeetas are filthy
nIrJ0i
No.325097
>>325095
They are not indians
DHAC0a
No.325099
>>324816(OP)
crackers are such hypocrites man, they hate us for practicing things that they too did not so long ago but now take moral high ground over what's right and wrong
Ws8TTq
No.325154
>>325099
the difference is how long it took to become civilosed. Europeans did it 2 centuries ago. India is yet to
