Recent Posts
wFIM6F
No.487688
Since you accused me of running away, I'm continuing it here.
>they'd expected Zelen Tzu to be rational
Cope, Zelenskyy had a few mistakes, but he played diplomacy so well that he saved his country from not just a total collapse but actually scoring wins as well. Why would he simply give up when he has proven himself already?
>USA and NATO can't invade Russia.
Other than the fact that I never said this, they can't only because there is no poltical appetite for it nor there is any need for it. Russia is less of a threat to the global order of liberal states than populism is at home.
>Muh nukes
The only real card Russia has.
You can now mental breakdown with you usual braindead copium, zigger faggot.
Uklu3R
No.487741
>>487688(OP)
Who even cares faggot? Ye batao aasim munir ne breakfast mein kya khaaya
x26h1/
No.487771
>>487688(OP)
He's a CIA puppet faggot, besides what even is your point, you were shitting about a drawn-out war indicating humiliation, which it necessarily doesn't, long term attrition or maneuver is not a choice or a metric of stupidity or smartness, it is adapting to changing circumstances. You are just extended an argument that had been long debunked in the last thread. It isn't possible to make you understand strategy or tactics, because I posted an essay in the last thread and you clearly lack the braincells to comprehend it.
x26h1/
No.487779
>>487771
Last (you) your retard gets btw. If you still want responses kindly post a para briefly describing Russian and Ukrainian organization and the different phases that played in the war, because I can't be bothered to keep screaming at a meaty wall that refuses to listen and can't understand even if it did because it doesn't even know the basics of what it is pretending to be.
SsgYfZ
No.487784
>>487771
>it is adapting to changing circumstances.
The circumstances being Russia failing.
>You are just extended an argument that had been long debunked in the last thread.
Shouldn't have coped and assumed I was running away from a mental midget with anger issues.
>You are just extended an argument that had been long debunked in the last thread.
Just like Russia, ziggers prematurely declare victory without even doing anything.
>It isn't possible to make you understand strategy or tactics, because I posted an essay in the last thread and you clearly lack the braincells to comprehend it.
Worldcelling doesn't make your copium into anything substantive.
All you did, other than crying and seething, was misinterprete me into thinking I was saying US or NATO could easily invade Russia or something.
>>487779
Yeah, run away, you little bitch.
