Recent Posts
What happens to those foids whose clips get leaked? Do their life get worse? What do their family think and do? How the society behave?
SFpu+E
No.291830
>>291829(OP)
availablility of nutrition
/AUyZN
No.291834
SFpu+E
No.291837
the differences aren't THAT stark, only the color scheme makes it appear like that. This map is unreliable considering the small sample size.
aS+vLl
No.291839
/AUyZN
No.291843
>>291839
You low iq lindus dont understand the concept of Tehjeeb
e1qqz4
No.291844
>>291834
Naarthies have more protein intake than Soythies tho. Jatbhangis chug milk products every few hours while soythies only drink milk while tea and the only other protein source is kfc or chilly chicken they eat once a month.
SFpu+E
No.291847
>>291839
hijab protects from sunlight
the differences aren't THAT start, only the color scheme makes it appear like that. This map is unreliable considering the small sample size.
The color black makes it unreasonable. It should be white instead to deflect most sunlight.
SFpu+E
No.291848
>>291843
yeah hindus don't understand the concept of culture and civilization
/AUyZN
No.291849
>>291844
JK, Gujarat and HP, Southern RJ dont have Jaats, Rajputs and bhumihars are lactose intolerant yet tall
Iie3Hp
No.291852
>>291829(OP)
If your state has lower percentage that bihar now never make fun of us again
+vnpSw
No.291854
Odiyachads, we lost this one
/AUyZN
No.291855
>>291852
In bihar only few castes are tall, the castes which migrated from western region
e1qqz4
No.291856
>>291839
That thread was funny, seeing a librandu who don't understand how conduction work and immediately brought up ancient Egyptians(who lived in fertile nile plains, this is like thinking dalli bhangis live in a desert because thar desert is nearby) because saar that was what I saw in mummy returns saar.
>>291849
Doesn't matter, those states still have higher protein intake.
oGH6CJ
No.291858
>>291829(OP)
This was 20 years back??
Iie3Hp
No.291859
>>291855
caste have not to do with height
/AUyZN
No.291860
>>291856
Dont southies eat meat too
/AUyZN
No.291862
>>291859
It has, higher the steppe taller your community is
oGH6CJ
No.291864
I need to see the latest stats
e1qqz4
No.291865
SFpu+E
No.291866
>>291861
It were arabs who taught cujlture to Persia and India. You should be more grateful to muslims from now onwards.
SFpu+E
No.291869
>>291865
ye gupta kya kar rha south mein ?
/AUyZN
No.291872
>>291861
45% of jaats are muslim
/AUyZN
No.291873
>>291869
Agarwal is different caste
/AUyZN
No.291874
Yaar linduo tumhare caste system ke baare mai tumse jyada mujhe pata hai
aS+vLl
No.291875
>>291866
It was me the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon me). I used to be a pedo and to justify my pedopana, i made a story that allah told me to do so. I wasn't expecting you all take that seriously
Iie3Hp
No.291876
>>291862
Then why south indians is taller
SFpu+E
No.291877
>>291873
agarwals are banias in north. I've heard of a vanigar caste in South.
SFpu+E
No.291878
aS+vLl
No.291879
>>291872
Whatever they banged me in previous life when I was pedo prophet Muhammad
/AUyZN
No.291880
>>291877
Gupta is usedby everyone, baniyas have different subcategories, aggarawals are one of them
SFpu+E
No.291881
>>291880
in north only banias use gupta surname
8hxpBN
No.291882
>>291876
They arent
Iie3Hp
No.291884
>>291882
look at map
ualxVX
No.291885
>>291881
Gupta is just a title, any vaishya can use it.
/AUyZN
No.291890
>>291876
North and west is tallest despite being poor, gangetic plains is AASI shifted other then few UCs
SFpu+E
No.291892
>>291885
only banias use it. Pandit, Agnihotri are titles which only Brahmins use.
/AUyZN
No.291895
>>291892
Telis use gupta too
ualxVX
No.291899
>>291892
those surnames are caste specific buy manusmriti has prescribed gupta surname for anyone from vaishya varna
ualxVX
No.291901
>>291895
banias use gotra as surname.
SFpu+E
No.291902
>>291895
98% guptas in north are banias
/AUyZN
No.291904
>>291902
You wish
/AUyZN
No.291905
>>291901
Mostly not all
SFpu+E
No.291906
>>291904
yeah they are and they look ugly
SFpu+E
No.291907
>>291906
they run small shops in every district
/hOv5N
No.291908
>>291829(OP)
Because Northern states have superior brahmin gotras genes.
/hOv5N
No.291910
>>291908
Not all Brahmin gotras are equal.
/AUyZN
No.291911
>>291906
High AASI, IDK how they even become UCs
ualxVX
No.291912
>>291905
Real bania use gotra for surname. Aggarwal sounds like a haryanavi gotra
ualxVX
No.291916
>>291906
nonesense. Miss india was a bania
oGH6CJ
No.291921
>>291910
what are the superior gotras then?
YfEtX3
No.291922
>>291829(OP)
Why can't Dosa Niqqers grow?
/AUyZN
No.291925
>>291912
Aggarwal is subcaste
They have maheshwari, porwal, oswal, bansal and many other subcastes
This people dont intermarry
la6yYf
No.291926
>>291902
My family is kshatriya, I mean used to be, we use gupta title
SFpu+E
No.291927
>>291916
I didn't say that all banias are ugly but comparatively to other dwija castes banias tend to have a significantly higher percentage of ugly people. Many OBC castes north of Narmada look better than Banias on average.
32f4sC
No.291928
How come kerala so different from rest of south, is beef really that nutritious
/AUyZN
No.291930
>>291916
That Porwal girl ? She was from ujjain, most likely her ancestors were rajasthani, rajasthani baniyas have Zagros, which make them look human
SFpu+E
No.291931
>>291926
which state do you live in.
and I don't think other people from your caste use that surname.
ualxVX
No.291933
>>291925
What is their gotra?
/AUyZN
No.291936
>>291933
Depends on subcaste
ualxVX
No.291940
>>291927
Mahajans alone mogs most north indian caste. Obc is not a caste.
SFpu+E
No.291941
>>291925
>This people dont intermarry
north indians don't marry within same gotra.
you probably are unaware of some specific details about this information.
ualxVX
No.291943
>>291936
what surnames do they use
/AUyZN
No.291948
>>291941
They are all subcastes, just like brahmins have different groups
SFpu+E
No.291949
>>291940
>Mahajans
hmm.. they do seem to look better than an average bania but still there are few OBC castes in UP and Rajasthan that mog them on average. In Haryana, Punjab J&K, Uttrakhand and Himachcal even a couple of SC castes will mog them.
/AUyZN
No.291952
>>291949
>In Haryana, Punjab J&K, Uttrakhand and Himachcal even a couple of SC castes will mog them.
Lol no
>they do seem to look better than an average bania but still there are few OBC castes in UP and Rajasthan that mog them on
OBCs of that region are UCs bby genes, just because lindu fanfic says that they are LCs doesnt make them LC
ualxVX
No.291957
SFpu+E
No.291959
ualxVX
No.291962
>>291959
their name is meena, anyone can use meena name.
/AUyZN
No.291964
>>291959
Meenas are UCs too, your lindu caste system dont define status, its steppe ancestry which plays role here
And now show non meena SCs
SFpu+E
No.291965
>>291957
Gujjar (Sts) of J&K and Himachal mog them
/AUyZN
No.291967
>>291965
Gujjars are general in other states
ualxVX
No.291970
>>291965
Gujjar is general.
SFpu+E
No.291971
>>291967
pahadi gujjars are a different caste
SFpu+E
No.291972
>>291967
and Gujjars of mainland are OBCs btw
/AUyZN
No.291976
>>291969
Many brahmins are ST too, like Gadda brahmins
SFpu+E
No.291977
>>291970
OBC
SFpu+E
No.291980
/AUyZN
No.291981
>>291971
Different religion you mean ? We muslims keep our blood pure by marrying in our own biradari unlike hindus
ualxVX
No.291982
>>291969
only those with meena name look better, rest are mogged by maheshwaris
OZ9RWB
No.291984
>>291975
Is a 3* increase not a stark difference nangu pangu hizruboy.
SFpu+E
No.291985
>>291981
no, different castes. Even the punjabi Gujjars of Pakistan don't marry the pahadi gujjars of Kashmir or west punjab/KPK.
/AUyZN
No.291986
>>291980
They are legit brahmins
And i am here not defending baniyas, just stating facts
Some baniyas look like literal dalits, while some look typical UC
SFpu+E
No.291989
>>291982
I bet that Nidhi Maheshwari is mixed caste
/AUyZN
No.291991
>>291985
Cultural difference
SFpu+E
No.291992
>>291982
but yeah some maheshwaris look alright.
/AUyZN
No.291995
Whats your caste ?
ualxVX
No.291998
>>291992
better than meenas. also baniyas don't need st status
/AUyZN
No.292000
>>291998
Some baniyas have dalit tier genes
ualxVX
No.292001
>>291989
Lol I have seen many such banias.
ualxVX
No.292002
>>292000
they are non banias who stole bania surname to look cool
SFpu+E
No.292003
>>291991
no, different castes.
Pahadi Gujjars are nomads. Land Gujjars live a settle life dependent on agriculture.
This is a big difference, so big that a primitive caste like gujjar cannot have that much distincting within its 2 subgroups. They should be counted as 2 different castes. Indian and Pakistani governement count them as two seperate castes.
SFpu+E
No.292005
>>292001
not saying that they don't exist. I have even seen mogger dalits in north.
SFpu+E
No.292008
>>292002
nope, they are all bania and they intermary with each other and Jains.
ualxVX
No.292014
>>292008
banias don't even inter marry banias of different sub-caste. Where are you getting your false information from?
SFpu+E
No.292016
Banias despite being relatively well off than other castes don't hit the gym much often and avoid all sorts of sports and physical activities. so they look worse than their actual potential.
SFpu+E
No.292020
>>292014
this happens in village population of every caste. But majority of banias live in urban regions.
EUzAhr
No.292023
SFpu+E
No.292025
>>292023
I don't envy banias. They have no redeeming achievements.
ualxVX
No.292028
>>292023
can tell, it's very low population with only 40-50 villages. u can easily find my region if i share this
EUzAhr
No.292029
>>292025
Okay FP
EUzAhr
No.292032
>>292028
I am not gonna doxx, i too belong to very small community and told my caste here multiple times, these fuckers dont have any knowledge
Xb3fQx
No.292034
EUzAhr
No.292041
>>292034
There was no need to mention it, its pretty easy to identify you
You love pimping other high caste women to baniya chads
ualxVX
No.292043
>>292032
Not telling sorry
ualxVX
No.292048
>>292025
Birla mandir was by bania
Xb3fQx
No.292049
>>292048
Antilia was built by Bania as well.
Xb3fQx
No.292052
>>292048
btw Birlas worked with british to exploitthe Indian masses until Gandhi (another bania) told them to side with congress as the british rule was going to end soon.
ualxVX
No.292053
>>292049
yeah worlds most expensive building. what have your caste built? no hate to anyone but u are saying bania have no achievement thats false
EUzAhr
No.292055
ualxVX
No.292056
>>292052
so did parsis. also what's your definition of exploitation? At least banias return to hinduism unlike their iranian asses.
ualxVX
No.292061
>>292055
they view past from modern lens but back then our ancestors did what they needed to ensure survival. many kings also allied with britishers and mughals
ualxVX
No.292065
>>292060
nice dodge
Xb3fQx
No.292067
>>292061
so now you will even go as far as justifying collusion with the Brits ?
I think I agree with you. Brits were the ones who civilized the Indian subhumans.
p827ci
No.292068
ualxVX
No.292069
>>292067
yeah sometimes allying is necessary if they rebeled unnecessarily we would have had unnecessary blood shed
ualxVX
No.292070
>>292068
I think he is some meena guy from rajasthan that's envious of successful marwadi banias
Xb3fQx
No.292071
>>292068
see that picture, people with surname meena
Xb3fQx
No.292073
>>292070
huh, no I am not a meena. There was a ugly blackoid meena history teacher in my school who hated me.
EUzAhr
No.292075
>>292073
You are a jealous brahmin
Keep coping, baniyas are the reason hinduism is still functioning
Xb3fQx
No.292076
>>292069
I wished your fellow bania Dyaush agreed with us. He hates british. He even banned me when I praised the British colonial rule.
Xb3fQx
No.292077
>>292075
I am not a brahmin. I've told it so many times. I don't think Banias have any achievements significant enough to attract jealousy of Brahmins.
I think Brahmins only hate Muslims in general.
ualxVX
No.292078
>>292076
Hating brits is justified but we have to be pragmatic when viewing people's actions from past. I can see how you bootlick brits
EUzAhr
No.292079
>>292077
Whats the point of hating on baniyas
ualxVX
No.292080
>>292076
then why are you shilling meenas? they are ugly by your own admission.
EUzAhr
No.292081
>>292078
Brits did some good things to india
3vnwgy
No.292082
>>291829(OP)
So beefmaxxing is a viable way for increasing height
ualxVX
No.292083
>>292081
they did more harm than good they completely destroyed our system
ualxVX
No.292084
Xb3fQx
No.292086
>>292080
no they aren't ugly, they definitely stand out among the BIMARU SCs along with a few Paswans.
Xb3fQx
No.292088
>>292079
I don't hate Banias. I just state the truth. People dislike it because they are never told these harsh realities.
Why would I even hate Banias ? Even If they get replaced then somebody else will take their place. It makes no sense to hate them for their occuapation because the current economic system makes it inevitable to work on any alternates.
Xb3fQx
No.292091
>>292083
they why did some people colluded with them ?
ualxVX
No.292092
>>292091
to ensure survival as we weren't equiped for a war.
EUzAhr
No.292095
>>292083
Many
EUzAhr
No.292098
>>292088
Baniyas having high AASI is a fake narrative started by leftists
Average Rajasthani baniya looks like typical Uppercaste
ualxVX
No.292100
>>292095
At what cost? colonization set our country back by 500 years.
Xb3fQx
No.292101
>>292092
so some people at the behest of masses of poor indians colluded with them just to ensure their own survival ?
Very selfish of them.
Xb3fQx
No.292102
>>292101
not 'behest' but 'expense' is the correct word
ualxVX
No.292104
>>292101
they did it for survival of all people in their constituency. a war with brits would have killed poor masses too.
Xb3fQx
No.292106
>>292104
>for survival of all people in their constituency
hahahaha by exploiting themm to work on british plantations and selling their cotton and grains for cheap ? Or by forcing the poor people to work in coal mines to supply coal to the British rail network worldwide ?
ualxVX
No.292107
>>292101
first take a stance first, you say that it's selfish to ensure survival but then also claim that brits civilized India. What was the standing of Britain before invading india? Do u think India was like Africa before brits came here? There iz a reason that they relied on treachery and other tactics to keep india colonized
ualxVX
No.292111
>>292106
that was the best way to avoid mass bloodshed. we didn't have much leeway over what we could do.
Xb3fQx
No.292114
>>292107
>first take a stance first, you say that it's selfish to ensure survival but then also claim that brits civilized India
you should take a logical stance first.
On one hand you say that it was okay to collude with british and on the other hand you say that Brits were evil.
Xb3fQx
No.292117
>>292111
British weren't going after the masses. They never did that in any colony. Thats not how colonization works.
Basic History and Politics 101.
ualxVX
No.292125
>>292114
>>292114
My stance is clear, brits were indeed evil and our ancestors did what they needed to. Same people later ousted the brits too
>>292117
Just think about this, who would be most affected if Indians waged large scale wars against brits? The people fighting those wars right? Brits were technologically superior, they also had the power to block our trade routes.
Xb3fQx
No.292128
Xb3fQx
No.292132
>>292125
>Indians waged large scale wars against brits?
indians weren't united to pull that massive feat.
British even at the peak of their colonial were absolute minority, most of their lackeys were traitorous selfish natives.
ualxVX
No.292136
>>292128
we're going in circles now
Xb3fQx
No.292137
>>292136
because you are not acceptin the simple fact that "If you collude with evil then you are evil as well".
ualxVX
No.292138
>>292132
they had the military power of entire British Empire at their bay, it was only a question of if they wanted to exercise it or not. Finding the new world gained them such riches.
ualxVX
No.292140
>>292137
I don't need to, you are not understanding the reasoning behind those temporary alliances.
Xb3fQx
No.292141
>>292138
>it was only a question of if they wanted to exercise it or not
it would never had been politically feasable to genocide all Indians. They were here only for exploting the natural resources. Don't fantasie about unrealistic things.
Xb3fQx
No.292144
>>292140
I understand very well, the selfish motives to fulfill your own greedy motives.
Rajputs colluded with Muslims because it was a political necessity as Muslims were rapists and genocidal maniacs. But similar things can't be said for British.
ualxVX
No.292147
>>292141
Why do you think we were colonized in the first place? Do you think we felt extra generous and thought to ourselves white massa can make better use of our resources? No, we were far outmatched both in technology and military tactics, that's why we even lost wars to brits where we far outnumbered them. We were inferior at that point of time, simple as.
ualxVX
No.292151
>>292144
Not true, british rule resulted in more deaths even when the environment was slightly saner.
Also mughals never exploited indian resources to the degree that Brits did, I agree they were slightly more civilized in the matter that they didn't explicitly burn villages, libraries destroy heritage but they had their own subtle ways of Destroying India.
Xb3fQx
No.292152
>>292147
Yes. And they colonized us for our resources.
The greedy natives colluded with them will the end for their own personal gains.
Its that simple.
OR
The British were good guys overall who actually improved the decadent civilization of India and thus the people who colluded with them weren't evil as well.
Choose one narrative among these two.
Xb3fQx
No.292154
>>292151
this is irrrelevant to our current discussion.
>british rule resulted in more deaths
indirect deaths which was a reslut of economic exploitation of the masses which was carried on by the greedy selfish native middle-men.
Xb3fQx
No.292155
>>292152
*till
Xb3fQx
No.292156
>>292155
*till the end
ualxVX
No.292157
>>292152
Neither is completely true, things aren't as black and white as they seem to you.
ualxVX
No.292164
>>292154
irrelevant, thet were still induced by british regime and this is completely relevant since you brought up the point about muslim invaders.
ualxVX
No.292166
>>292164
they*
Xb3fQx
No.292168
>>292164
political allliance are only necessary when the threat is direct.
British caused an indirect harm, they extended political alliance with the greedy natives to exploit the masses and not the other way round like in case of Mughal where the rajputs had no other option but to ally with the muslims in order to save their lives and their women.
Xb3fQx
No.292172
>>292157
yeah when it doesn't reinforce your worldview then it becomes a grey area of history. So far everything was black-white as far as it was in compliance with your narrative.
Ye bania-giri kahi aur dikhaana.
Xb3fQx
No.292174
>>292169
what is there even to answer ? They colonized us for our labour and resources. TO MAKE PROFITS overseas was the main motive of EAST INDIA COMPANY.
ualxVX
No.292179
>>292172
Tameez se baat karle personal attack mai bhi de sakta hu. Mera stance se shooroo say same hai. I accepted that they did ally temporarily to prevent large bloodshed since we weren't capable of ousting them by force we took up the method of non violence.
2RndJg
No.292180
This thread is in /b/ while mine is moved in /pol/, why mods why
ualxVX
No.292181
>>292174
So you do accept that weren't capable of defeating east india company and therefore had to comply by their wishes of exploiting our natural resources?
Xb3fQx
No.292182
>>292179
>to prevent large bloodshed
British colonial companies ne kahin bhi direct mass scale bloodshed nhi kiya history mein. Tu kyu unrealistic fantasies bnaa rha hai apna point prove karne ke liye.
Unhone sirf greedy natives ke saath collude kiya taaki masses ko exploit kar sakein.
Unhein kisi pagal kuttay ne nahi kaata tha so hazaaro kilometar duur samundra paar karke kalue logo ko genocide karne ke motive se jaatay.
Ye faltu ki fantasy mat bnaa.
Xb3fQx
No.292183
>>292181
> therefore had to comply by their wishes of exploiting our natural resources?
yes and the greedy ones KEPT COLLUDING WITH THEM EVEN WHEN the congress and other political groups started opposing their rule.
ualxVX
No.292185
>>292182
>British colonial companies ne kahin bhi direct mass scale bloodshed nhi kiya history mein. Tu kyu unrealistic fantasies bnaa rha hai apna point prove karne ke liye. Unhone sirf greedy natives ke saath collude kiya taaki masses ko exploit kar sakein.
They had to collude temporarily to avoid mass bloodshed, otherwise brits had many other more brutal ways for fulfilling their wishes
>Unhein kisi pagal kuttay ne nahi kaata tha so hazaaro kilometar duur samundra paar karke kalue logo ko genocide karne ke motive se jaatay.
Lol don't you know what happened in Africa and americas? They had much more brutal ways for exploiting and capturing our resource enriched land. Think big
Xb3fQx
No.292186
>>292182
on the other hand the musalmaans weren't shy of raping and genociding the kafirs.
Xb3fQx
No.292189
>>292185
>otherwise brits had many other more brutal ways for fulfilling their wishes
>what happened in Africa and americas?
America mein settlers gaye thay naa ki colonizers ya private companies. Woh settlers religious persecution ki wajah se gaye thay kyunki unka christian sect alag tha.
Settlers ko zameen permamnently chahiye thi isiliye unhone natives ke saath brutal atyachaar kiya.
Africa mein british ne kahin bhi mass murders (out of war) conduct nahi kiye apna kaam karwaane ke liye.
Faaltu ki fantasies mat bnaa, fir bol rhaa hu.
ualxVX
No.292190
>>292183
The initial goal was survival, though I agree as the political tide shifted they were late to change their stance too, perhaps they did get a bit greedy by the end, still that's a very small period.
Xb3fQx
No.292192
>>292190
🙏🙏🙏
bhai mein chalaa, tuu bahaane bnaata reh. Koyi ameer itna chutiya nahi hota jise apni country ke political atmosphere ki samajh naa ho.
ualxVX
No.292195
>>292189
>America mein settlers gaye thay naa ki colonizers ya private companies. Woh settlers religious persecution ki wajah se gaye thay kyunki unka christian sect alag tha.
Not even true, The British state and its chartered companies sponsored or protected settler movements wherever it was profitable or geopolitically useful, including in North America, Australia, and Southern Africa. The Atlantic slave trade, plantation economies, and raw material extraction from the Caribbean directly enriched Britain for centuries. The sugar, cotton, and tobacco money built half of industrial England.
>Africa mein british ne kahin bhi mass murders (out of war) conduct nahi kiye apna kaam karwaane ke liye.
Why do you think the wars were caused in first place?
ualxVX
No.292197
>>292192
Jante they tabhi unhone kiya jo sahi tha. Ab bhaag mat, tumahri argument mei dum hee nahi tha.
Xb3fQx
No.292200
>>292195
settlers aur colonizers mein difference hota hai. India mein settling purpose se nahi aaye the woh kyunki yahaan ka climate unsuitable tha. Isiliye unhone hillstations bhi banaaye thay India mein.
Tu ye google ai se answers mat paste kar, apna dimaag lgaa. India mein agar permanent settle honay aaye hotay tab zyadaa chances hotay mass bloodshed ke.
>>292197
>tabhi unhone kiya jo sahi tha
har laalchi yahi bolta hai ki jo woh kar rha hai woh uskay liye sahi hai.
ualxVX
No.292207
>>292200
Whatever, the point remains, they had their objective, that was to exploit india. They could have fulfilled it using other methods too if needed. Temporary alliance was better for Indians in the grand scheme of things.
ualxVX
No.292228
>>292209
Are you a rajput? do realize that even rajput kings allied with brits?
G97kZJ
No.292235
>>291829(OP)
Jaat Balwan, Jai Bhagwan.
UCPi/M
No.292265
>>291829(OP)
>2005-6
