Recent Posts
iphone 13 pro max in 2025
ssJbOI
No.294440
I have watched so many conspiracy videos that I think women dating around lots of men is literally nothing as compared to what's going on in the world.
Rich powerful people literally own everything in this world and you guys are more concerned about girls wearing backless and dating guys, how stupid.
uTcwg+
No.294452
>>294440(OP)
This is how they psyop you into normalizing randipana
YDE+4z
No.294467
cvJrV+
No.294484
>>294440(OP)
Wealth inequality is a meme, pic related(4x increase means everyone in India becomes as rich as average anon here).
It's obviously just bait for retarded low IQ gib lovers to rile up.
cvJrV+
No.294490
>>294440(OP)
>>294484
I don't care how hard your life must seem to you, if you're able to type English like this, then it must mean you got a good enough education and your life is likely 4x maybe even 10x better than the average pajeet.
It's more likely you'll lose money if more than anything is we tried to solve wealth inequality. I remember redditoids saying 1 lakh per month is low which puts them in actuality the top 1% of the country.
Xe/qNm
No.294493
>>294490
>1 lakh per month is low
Entire pajeet population, should come at a district distinct classes standards. And no, it shouldn't be income based, it should be net worth based. Pajeets hoarding giga tons of land call themselve poor by working bare jobs while making crores behind the scenes.
cvJrV+
No.294500
>>294497
Do mind Wealth is sum of house + back balance + owned goods and rest.
If you're living in a house and have a car, you're likely living many times better than the average Indian.
Xe/qNm
No.294501
>>294497
Average is very chutiya distinction. Cut the cream of the crop exceptional billionaires and then take the median. A bunch of handful billionaires inflate the actual stats by big margins.
>>294497
>then average Indian have a wealth of 60 lakh rupees.
You know how bs this. Not even top 10% will have such wealth
cvJrV+
No.294502
>>294501
>Cut the cream of the crop exceptional billionaires and then take the median
That's what they did, go read their methodology.
>A bunch of handful billionaires inflate the actual stats by big margins.
That's just a myth. Median income in most countries don't fare that much greater than their average.
Also most billionaires don't have easily exchanged assets. Most of it are in stocks.
>You know how bs this.
Then you probably don't know anything other than populist rhetoric.
Xe/qNm
No.294506
>>294502
>Also most billionaires don't have easily exchanged assets. Most of it are in stocks
Thats still assets and counted as such.
>read their methodology
Just say
>Then you probably don't know anything other than populist rhetoric
you trying to say average indian has 60 lakh wealth around here? Lmao Not even worth having conversation now
cvJrV+
No.294509
>>294506
>Thats still assets and counted as such.
You can't translate that well to easily spent disposable income.
>you trying to say average indian has 60 lakh wealth around here
I said average anon here probably have around 60 lakh net income. Not average Indian.
Are you trying to tell me the average person here is a bhangan who lives with 3-4 other bhangans of his own family in a single room like how an actual average Indian lives?
It's likely if you live in house and your family can afford to give you a personal room, then your family have a net wealth of around 60 lakhs.
cvJrV+
No.294510
>>294506
https://www.99acres.com/3-bhk-flats-in-hubli-ffid
I just checked prices of 2 bhks in a tier 3 town and all of them float around 40-60 lakh. Even assuming the most minimal setting(That your parents had a room and you or your siblings together lived in another room), you have a wealth of around 60 lakh.
cvJrV+
No.294512
cvJrV+
No.294515
Xe/qNm
No.294524
>>294509
>You can't translate that well to easily spent disposable income.
Not, but they can still take loans with it and speand like billions around. The problems is if they are counted in the study or not. Which i think would be
>>294509
>I said average anon here probably have around 60 lakh net income. Not average Indian.
Obviously. Bhachcels are rich. I was talking about general standard of classes for all over India. But with district distinctions.
cvJrV+
No.294537
>>294529
>>294524
Btw did same calculation for millionaires
>bhachcels are rich
Compared to average jeet, yes.
>but I was talking about general standards of Indians
Well then OP was talking to bhachcels. Average living conditions of bhachcels wouldn't change if they started seething about rich people instead of women.
