Recent Posts
Pajeet loves to peddle FAKE history
CHFaBz
No.353573
And this isn't even some interesting alt-history big brain shit, it is the lowest IQ BS that can be verified on the shitternet in like 2 seconds.
>Harsha was a Jaat saar
Jats didn't migrate to punjab until 11th century CHAMAR, and it was only by 16th century that they spread in parts of rajasthan and angelic plains.
Harsha ruled in early 7th century, FUCKING 4 CENTURIES BEFORE JATS ARRIVED.
Here is the truth.
>The writings of Xuanzang and an 8th century Buddhist text, the Arya-manjushri-mula-kalpa suggest that the dynasty belonged to the Vaishya caste.
>Harsha was a buddhist saar
meanwhile the truth
>His seals describe his ancestors as worshippers of the Hindu sun god, Surya, his elder brother as a Buddhist, and himself as a Shaivite Hindu. His land grant inscriptions describe him as Parama-maheshvara (supreme devotee of Shiva). His court poet Bana also describes him as a Shaivite Hindu.
It is true that Harsha patronized Buddhism, but he was personally a shaivite, and his kingdom was dominated by shaivites as written by XuanZang.
why are Pajeets like this?
/JewIq
No.353595
>>353573(OP)
>Saar harsha singh jaat defeated timur with his feminist army saar please saar
5sE+sf
No.353602
>>353573(OP)
Every single ancient indian king is buddhist as per bhimtas
lq6sDJ
No.353628
>>353595
Funnily harsha did defeat a hunnic army who had partial turkish origins. Hunting Turks was a favourite past times of Indians before 10 th century.then Turks brutally ass fucked jeets for 600 yrs before Marathas exploded their dick in turkish mouths and removed them
lq6sDJ
No.353631
>>353628
They haven't yet come back ,seems the sissygasm satisfied them
