Recent Posts
Bihar eastern up is source of all major religions in India post hinduism, >Jainism >Buddhism >Sikhism In fact, same region was hub for North Black Polish Ware culture which coincides with first set of urbanization post fall IVC and it was first ...
Didn't know there was a new Dan Brown novel out bh...
Reading it now. It's great. Feel like I'm back in my school and college days.
RaNDz+
No.1187
Alchon Huns (राजपूत) & Scythian ने क्षत्रियो को मारा, और जिन ब्राह्मणो के वो यजमान थे उनकी वैदिक शाखा भी लुप्त हो गई ।
RaNDz+
No.1188
>>1187(OP)
>there are significant differences between the shakhas (branches/recensions) of the Yajurveda, primarily divided into the Shukla (White) Yajurveda and the Krishna (Black) Yajurveda. The main distinction lies in the separation of mantras (Samhita) and explanations (Brahmana); Shukla features them separately, while Krishna mixes them.
RaNDz+
No.1189
>>1187(OP)
>there are distinct differences between the surviving shakhas (branches or recensions) of the Samaveda, primarily in their arrangement of hymns (samhita), associated Brahmana texts, and geographical prevalence. While traditionally 1,000 branches existed, only three (Kauthuma, Ranayaniya, and Jaiminiya) remain, with Kauthuma being the most prominent.
>Samhita Arrangement: The Kauthuma samhita consists of two main parts: the Purvarcika and the Uttararcika, containing a total of 1,875 verses, 1,771 of which are derived from the Rigveda. The Jaiminiya tradition maintains a different ordering of these verses.
>Brahmana Texts: The Kauthuma shakha is associated with the Pancavimsha and Sadvimsha Brahmanas. Conversely, the Jaiminiya shakha possesses its own distinct Jaiminiya Brahmana.
Geographical Spread: The Kauthuma shakha is commonly followed in Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Odisha, and West Bengal. The Ranayaniya is found in Maharashtra, Karnataka, and parts of Odisha/Andhra Pradesh, while the Jaiminiya is mainly prevalent in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala.
v5k2vX
No.1190
>>1187(OP)
>जिन ब्राह्मणो के वो यजमान थे उनकी वैदिक शाखा भी लुप्त हो गई ।
That won't explain how did larger majority of sama veda got lost, since sama veda would be saturated towards east while the invasion would have taken place from West. It also won't make sense how other branches ended up staying infact.
Of Alchon Huns did kill the older and the former Kshatriya, and the real Kshatriya of nation died in that instance (whoever they may be) then it still won't make sense that the branches will not survive.
I have no say in the existence of the real vs neo Kshatriya entities, but branches being lost will be a different subject entirely. Most because of the fact that majority of surving sakha that do now exist, such as the incomplete sakha that were found in Kashmir and Odissa, both had their rajput families, which would imply the "former" kshatriya got displaced entirely.
It also makes even less sense since their is no evidence of who the original Kshatriyas were by this logic. But that is upto rest of you to decide.
RaNDz+
No.1191
>>1187(OP)
>there are significant differences between the shakhas (branches/recensions) of the Atharvaveda, primarily between the two surviving traditions: the Shaunakiya and the Paippalada. While tradition mentions nine shakhas, only these two are currently available, with distinct variations in their arrangement, content, and number of hymns.
>Structure and Content: The Shaunakiya tradition (common in South India) has 20 books (Kandas), 730 hymns, and approximately 5,987 mantras. The Paippalada tradition (prevalent in Kashmir/Odisha) often has a different order of hymns, contains a larger amount of material not found in Shaunakiya, and possesses significant textual variations
>Accessibility: The Shaunakiya is the dominant, widely recognized samhita, whereas the Paippalada exists in far fewer, sometimes fragmented, manuscripts.
>Differences in Rituals: As they are different schools of learning, they may have slight variations in the application of hymns for specific rituals or in their associated Brahmanas.
v5k2vX
No.1193
>>1191
Yaar cuckbringer, kitna copy paste karega, these threads are not your shit post dump.
vNpzGI
No.1196
>>1194
That anon is just obviously just shitposting with whatever pattern he noticed he has no info on your ip or anything.
I removed the region block after our conversation in other thread thinking you wanted to add something.
RaNDz+
No.1198
>>1196
chup chamar, I know you and your henchmen can track my identity through my ip. You have done it many times.
vNpzGI
No.1199
>>1198
Retard are you genuinely autistic? Any non retard can found about certain stuff glazing xyz groups come from you - like that bait thread.
And you have spammed your details - yourself on the boards.
Now come back to topic.
vNpzGI
No.1200
JN9jGZ
No.1201
>>1196
Hey speak for yourself Dayoos, I can't promise I didn't unironically track his IP and his irl location, lmao. I don't own the site like you, isiliye in sare anons ki ma toh mai bhi deserve karta hu 
JN9jGZ
No.1202
>>1198
Yaar all jain come from Vaishya Varna, you come from shudra one. You are unironically closer to a chamar than he is, in case you didn't know anon. Don't bring that shitty faggotry here.
QMeFot
No.1229
>>1187(OP)
Why is RANDZ+ written infront of your name kek
