Recent Posts
who do y’all think was the better mughal ruler?
run1WT
No.268
i used to think aurangzeb was more based, and he was kinda hitler coded too. but the more i look into it, he tanked the entire mughal empire. he was too obsessed with religion, ruined the economy, and pissed off literally everyone (even other muslims) kek
>inb4 "but he was righteous and stood for his faith"
he also speedran the mughal collapse. marathas rose, sikhs got radicalized, and the whole thing fell apart after him. not very based if your empire dies right after you
akbar on the other hand was def a libtard, or like lowkey far-left for his time. but dude literally built a temple for his hindu waifu 💀. he tried making some fusion religion, removed jizya, hired scholars from other religion to show tolerance, etc. total secular king
>but muh islamic values
>bro was playing 4D chess
but i'd still pick akbar. he was less based maybe, but way smarter and way better at not speedrunning failure kek
FPStuy
No.269
>>268(OP)
Definitely akbar
WWvsvm
No.301
>>268(OP)
Akbar wasn't even muslim
CeP/jZ
No.308
>>268(OP)
When you realise even Aurangzeb patronised temples
