/sa/ - Sāhitya & Itihāsa

His thought-process mirrors that of a lot of based Hindu nationalists as well (Savarkar, Aurobindo, etc), but he reaches an entirely different conclusion with it.

Was Ambedkar correct?

Read worshipping false god by arun shoruie. It reveals his true nature . Also you can refer to recent posts from pure economics (keshav bedi)

>>309(OP)

>Was Ambedkar correct?

No, he was full of shit and retarded. If SC, ST and Mahar caste managed to get to the majority in all public sectors and were running goverment he'd be silent like a giddy fat bald fuck ugly bastard he was. It has, never been about equality, it was simply about "but what about me".

He didn't even want decimation of caste, he just wanted restriction of who claims which caste to be removed. That's literally like saying, one has issues with use of AI, but not if he gets to use it for free. He snowballed his way to greatness, credited for a constitution that he actually was inherently against creating.

His poorly formed thought process mirrors a lot of based hindu because any subhuman knows that is the best way to make all your shitty ideas seem acceptable to general public. He reached a different conclusion entirely because again, this subhuman balding fuck had an entirely different confirmation bias. No, he was not correct.

>>309(OP)

>based hindu nationalists

There was nothing based about them. They were weak people who hid behind religion