/rta/ - Ṛta

I've seen so many whit people, especially on 4chan claim that Bhagwan Indra hates people with dark skin. Is it true? Is he a European God? Can anyone provide scriptural evidences for these claims?

>>5957(OP)

There is none.

>>5957(OP)

Your entire premise is wrong.

>I've seen so many whit people, especially on 4chan

same people who worship dead jew on a stick? People who worship a god foreign to them, call their own gods shaitan, destroy their own heritage are not worth the respect or attention.

>claim that Bhagwan Indra hates people with dark skin.

This is typical wignat/amerimutt fixation with skin color, they can't even define what is 'white' race, a rootless society which when couldn't find its own achievement tried to co-opt other's achievement by using 'race card'.

>Is it true? Is he a European God? Can anyone provide scriptural evidences for these claims?

>european

define european.

There is no such as 'european' about Vedas, descendants of those who composed vedas still exist here, still carry on the same tradition. They have the gotra, lineage and the root. The aryans was only referred to the indo-iranians, anyone else is malechcha.

Aryans clans themselves fought themselves, be it split of iranians and vedic Indians, or the formation of the Kuru state when Bharata defeated the puru and other aryan clans in the battle of ten kings. Finally all of them came together to compose the rigveda which has hymns from each clan. Descendants of those eventually splintered into multiple republics, kingdoms post mahabharata. Eventually further spread, every native kingdom would trace back to them.

People migrated from all over the place, everyone ultimately came from Africa, so ig africans are the true heirs of vedas lel.

After a certain point it becomes useless to bother and waste of resource.

>>5996

It's better to understand what constitutes a civilization/rashtra (rashtra is not same as nation), we call ourself civilization - state, so you should understand its meaning.

A civilization or rashtra consists of three things, people, land and the rules. In our current state, India and other countries are the amorphous remnants of what was a breathing, healthy civilization. Our rules are derived from west, which in turns has its basis in platonic ideas.

One way to judge the state of a civilization is to see the elites of that rashtra, what they follow. How many of our current elites follow the traditions of the past? Mostly symbolic but there's huge mix of western influence.

Rules have changed, past rules of civilization have become optional or forgotten, land of pakistan, afghanistan, bangladesh has pretty much lost on all the three pillars of what was our civilisation.

India in current form, is amorphous at best. You can see the signs of our past, brahmins trying to keep the millennium old traditions, but everything has become optional.

When people kang about we wuzz, it is just an opposite direction of what they should be doing. You speak an english tongue, you worship a jewish god, you do not know anything about pitr worship...it's all meaningless.

IVC is meme term, sindhu-saraswati civilisation is more significant, there's no abrupt invation or destruction of the civilisation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Painted_Grey_Ware_culture like PGW shows that harappans and "aryans" were pretty much co-existing together. It was excavated by BB Lal based on the history of mahbharata.

>>6003

Why i tried to emphasize on 'rashtra' part is because aryans referred to very specific group of people who belonged to the land of indo-iran, tbh in particular more of sindhu-saraswati, Kuru - around Haryana following certain customs, the foundries of the kingdoms which eventually constitute what is our current country.

Everything else is meaningless larp.

>>6003

>>6005

>>5996

TLDR; is that aryans were specific group of indo-iranians living in the land of sapta-sindhu, who followed vedic customs. Remember these three details, you can go back to as long as everyone was monkey or define a baseline of what is ingrained in the vedic though of 'rashtra', people-land-rule. This rules out anyone who is not from sub continent, their descendants resulted in the various kingdoms here, their traditions are still upheld, the lineage is still maintained through the system of gotra. Hymns chanted at the banks of saraswati are still chanted by their descendants, no one else has the right on this.

But as with everything, that rashtra, civilization perished and we got what is today called India, how it goes on from here is a different story. What culture, rules and law we pursue.

So such questions and remarks should be ignored, instead focus should be on understanding ourselves.

>>6009

If I as a Hindi speaking Brahmin who got distracted from the religious path, want to get back to my roots, what should I do? Should I start speaking Sanskritized-Hindi and something? How exactly should I change my lifestyle?

>>6494

Start posting Aaramb Hai Prachanda BJP edits on YouTube

>>5957(OP)

He must have, why else would he shit up endia?

>>7007

Kek, I used to blast the song on my chinese speakers a few years back whenever some muzzie passed by our house until one day I saw two chappris doing the same in a local bhajpa rally. It was then when I contemplated what was I doing wrong. This has to be some scam.